Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
RFC phase ← December 2025 May 2026 October 2026 → Shortcut WP:AELECTWP:AELECT Administrator elections are one of two processes for selecting administrators...
Click to read more »even sans nominator, because I wanted to help out, and I didn't see the AELECT as really being too much of an indication either way on which way an RfA...
Click to read more »the final five columns with | colspan="5" {{TBA}}. Y Ask at WP:AN and WT:AELECT for Y ≥3 admins to volunteer as election clerks Y 2 admins to volunteer...
Click to read more »"(we are here)" at WP:AELECT/Month Year#Schedule Yarchive expired notices Ywatchlist notice - should auto expire Yheader of WP:AELECT - should auto switch...
Click to read more »fine with the same thing sometimes happening with AELECT-1 and AELECT-2. I think your model of AELECT-1 followed by RfA-1 is a realistic reading of where...
Click to read more »discussion page works Yredirect each candidate RFA page to point at the AELECT subpage Yper consensus at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections#Candidates...
Click to read more »Closing successful candidacy top: {{subst:Rfap|aelect=yes}} Closing failed candidacy top:{{subst:Rfaf|aelect=yes}} Individual candidate tally below top:...
Click to read more »Closing successful candidacy top: {{subst:Rfap|aelect=yes}} Closing failed candidacy top:{{subst:Rfaf|aelect=yes}} Individual candidate tally below top:...
Click to read more »16 AELECT candidates. That means triple the number of candidates preferred AELECT to RFA. This could mean that candidates really like the AELECT process...
Click to read more »We should let the Signpost newspaper know about AELECT. We should submit a tip to their newsroom. Visit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...
Click to read more »candidate subpage will be closed using the template {{subst:Rfaf|aelect=yes}}/{{subst:Rfab|aelect=yes}} to stop further discussion. An attempt will be made to...
Click to read more »Closing successful candidacy top: {{subst:Rfap|aelect=yes}} Closing failed candidacy top:{{subst:Rfaf|aelect=yes}} Individual candidate tally below top:...
Click to read more »AELECT2. Lasted 1 day in AELECT 3. There were some objections at WT:AELECT about having RFCs too frequently. Will check at WT:AELECT if an RFC phase is needed...
Click to read more »We should let the Signpost newspaper know about AELECT. We should submit a tip to their newsroom. Visit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...
Click to read more »We should let the Signpost newspaper know about AELECT. We should submit a tip to their newsroom. Visit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...
Click to read more »answer questions 1–3 Yredirect each candidate RFA page to point at the AELECT subpage Ymake sure Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion...
Click to read more »below super-majority of 66.67% to err on the side of caution, given that WP:AELECT is an automatic confirmation, as compared to WP:RfA where the goal is 75%...
Click to read more »to vote on a series of proposals to refine the process, decided at the AELECT workshop. This RfC will not discuss reauthorization of administrator elections;...
Click to read more »relevant to RfA than AELECT, and thus felt it was fine to press on with the run. My evaluation on this has since changed: AELECT, while different from...
Click to read more »opportunity and made some major changes this year, including the creation of WP:AELECT, WP:MONITOR, and WP:RECALL. Civility is also the reason I've been helping...
Click to read more »I'll get the chance to repay the favor by helping somebody else through an AELECT or RfA, once I've gotten a good amount of experience in, that is! The timezone...
Click to read more »candidate subpage will be closed using the template {{subst:Rfaf|aelect=yes}}/{{subst:Rfab|aelect=yes}} to stop further discussion. An attempt will be made to...
Click to read more »The recent petition has just reminded me that the threshold for a RRfA AELECT (ReAE?) is 55%. If the pass percentage for a normal election is lowered...
Click to read more »can be found on the respective AELECT subpage. There were a total of 14 RFAs this year until October. Considering AELECT, this brings 2024 to 49, reversing...
Click to read more »candidate subpage will be closed using the template {{subst:Rfaf|aelect=yes}}/{{subst:Rfab|aelect=yes}} to stop further discussion. An attempt will be made to...
Click to read more »to today's AELECT – that same RfC saw strong opposition to RfA clerks, for instance. In the latest debrief, people have noted that AELECT tends to attract...
Click to read more »it, please ask the other scrutineers, or in the AELECT election officials Discord chat, or at WT:AELECT. all 3 scrutineers should make a pass through the...
Click to read more »it, please ask the other scrutineers, or in the AELECT election officials Discord chat, or at WT:AELECT. all 3 scrutineers should make a pass through the...
Click to read more »bureaucracy, would anybody object to a hypothetical re-Rfa running through AELECT at the lower pass percentage anyways, even if it's a few days to a week...
Click to read more »Option B. I'm not comfortable with disallowing them entirely, but recent AELECTs have been significantly spammed by mass questions that just became a hassle...
Click to read more »gate, this is my second run. I probably should have put more thought into AELECT, and it's pretty clear with some reflection that my nomination could've...
Click to read more »with the help of WMF T&S staff. This year, with the introduction of WP:AELECT, we now have the ability to run elections locally without WMF staff help...
Click to read more »using AELECT. So the idea that we should increase the cutoff is a little surprising to me, as in my opinion this is proposing to move the AELECT bar from...
Click to read more »Eternal Proposal 13: Admin elections (trial), initiated by Novem Linguae (WP:AELECT) Proposal 14: Suffrage requirements, initiated by Kusma Proposal 17: Have...
Click to read more »double checked consensus on some things and improved some things about the AELECT process, and I'd encourage folks to take a look at the summary of that....
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »dates were announced, running the first traditional RfA after the October AELECT trial. Arbitration committee election: Questions may be asked of the candidates...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »irregularity but aren't sure if you should strike it, please ask on WT:AELECT. we can build consensus there for edge cases all 3 scrutineers should make...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »contribs) 02:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC) Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) – I ran for AELECT last July; and I wasn't elected (that nom page). So, I took a break and...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »as an invalid reason to raise the issue? I know that is a matter for the AElect talk page to discuss, but this should probably be done sooner rather than...
Click to read more »22:44, 8 May 2026 (UTC) @Voorts I can tell you're very frustrated at this AELECT. I'm not sure if the follow-ups will be anymore satisfying than the answers...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »opt to accept the desysop and give yourself greater time until the next AELECT, or an RFA in a few months? A: At that time of the recall, this looked like...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »AELECT is already an option. But only if the 30-day window after the closure of a recall petition overlaps with the call for candidates of an AELECT or...
Click to read more »§ Content categories. See also: § Maintenance category, § Tracking category. AELECT, ADE Abbreviation for "Administrator elections", the alternative process...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »process for becoming an administrator via admin elections is explained at WP:AELECT. Any candidate can decide to use either process. The elections process is...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was userfy. If the intention is to use this for AELECT then I see no prejudice against restoration closer to that time period (though...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »folks, it is my pleasure to nominate Bunnypranav for adminship in this AELECT cycle. Bunny’s contributions exemplify the spirit of a true wikignome; they...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »first set of requests for comment regarding the administrator elections (AELECT) process have come to an end, having reached the following key conclusions:...
Click to read more »brings the number of new admins this year to 12, continuing the trend of AELECT producing more new admins than RfA. There is now an ongoing debrief about...
Click to read more »the number of admin candidates in 2025 has already jumped to 23. Prior to AELECT, there were only 5 RFAs in the first half in 2025, 3 of which were successful...
Click to read more »conversely your edit summary usage is pretty good. I'd suggest leaving an RfA/AELECT at least two years, rack up several thousand positive edits—with no blocks...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »prior RfA) If I were to, say, nominate myself at the new experimental WP:AELECT, how would I fare? (Just a note: my CSD log can be ignored because I a)...
Click to read more »1 April 2026 (UTC) 8. What made you decide to run via RfA, rather than AELECT? A: abweeh hehe 13:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC) 9. Do you like cats? A: what is...
Click to read more »held every 2 months. Unsuccessful candidates from AELECT should not be allowed to go through AELECT again, especially if future elections are made routine...
Click to read more »Ca talk to me! 15:18, 18 July 2025 (UTC) My first time commenting at an AELECT or RFA. I've interacted with jlwoodwa several times. I have never contacted...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »Award for his substantial work on Wikipedia:Administrator elections. WP:AELECT was proposed in RfA reviews, and he has been instrumental in getting the...
Click to read more »the words of Tryptofish describing his recent highlighted close of the AELECT RfCs, Barkeep gives a master class in clueful determination of consensus...
Click to read more »even sans nominator, because I wanted to help out, and I didn't see the AELECT as really being too much of an indication either way on which way an RfA...
Click to read more »special reasons beyond the themes you've likely heard in discussions about AELECT already: I prefer that the (!)voting is public, I feel the community has...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »ArbCom in 2012. Since then, you have had two failed RFAs, an unsuccessful AELECT candidacy, and three unsuccessful runs for ArbCom. Can you please describe...
Click to read more »ArbCom in 2012. Since then, you have had two failed RFAs, an unsuccessful AELECT candidacy, and three unsuccessful runs for ArbCom. Can you please describe...
Click to read more »was quickly redirected back into Sahaib's main userpage as soon as this AELECT nomination went live. This seemingly-kneejerk BLAR has led to some oversights...
Click to read more »recall, some people still refuse to support decent admins, as evident at AELECT and a few RfAs. Weak Support K I'm torn here. On one hand, I do think everyone...
Click to read more »to be pointed out to me by HouseBlaster, now one of my nominators, that AELECT was coming up after I had made a request involving information from a deleted...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »opportunity and made some major changes this year, including the creation of WP:AELECT, WP:MONITOR, and WP:RECALL. Civility is also the reason I've been helping...
Click to read more »elections? A: Hi Daniel! Long time no see. I think that the creation of AELECT was a great decision and I fully support holding future elections. The reason...
Click to read more »opportunity and made some major changes this year, including the creation of WP:AELECT, WP:MONITOR, and WP:RECALL. Civility is also the reason I've been helping...
Click to read more »folks, it is my pleasure to nominate Bunnypranav for adminship in this AELECT cycle. Bunny’s contributions exemplify the spirit of a true wikignome; they...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »block from article space cannot be appealed until after a successful RFA/AELECT, however it is unlikely that they would successfully regain their adminship...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »v t e Administrator elections (AELECT), requests for adminship (RfA) and bureaucratship (RfB) Advice and request archives Administrators Noticeboard Requests...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »dates were announced, running the first traditional RfA after the October AELECT trial. Arbitration committee election: Questions may be asked of the candidates...
Click to read more »can be found on the respective AELECT subpage. There were a total of 14 RFAs this year until October. Considering AELECT, this brings 2024 to 49, reversing...
Click to read more »run now instead of stand for election ? A: The timing isn't related to AELECT. When approached to run, this felt like the right time. My thoughts were...
Click to read more »see the benefit in creating a new process when we already have RFA and AELECT. Thryduulf (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Over the last few years...
Click to read more »2 July 2025 (UTC) If the principle is "anyone who wouldn't pass an RFA/aelect shouldn't be an admin", and recall is for anyone who shouldn't be an admin...
Click to read more »to be pointed out to me by HouseBlaster, now one of my nominators, that AELECT was coming up after I had made a request involving information from a deleted...
Click to read more »Commission (perhaps the crats could action the userrights changes). For AELECT, it's trickier but could be discussed in post-trial discussions. For PII...
Click to read more »Successful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Unsuccessful candidacies Alphabetical AELECT Alphabetical RfA Chronological Resysopped...
Click to read more »unexpected happens, it would be better that it happens to AELECT. Once we've run a full AELECT through the new system with no problems, that's the time...
Click to read more »Support I was surprised when I didn't see MCE89's name at the previous AELECT, as one of the most ready candidates out there. I was even more surprised...
Click to read more »Award for his substantial work on Wikipedia:Administrator elections. WP:AELECT was proposed in RfA reviews, and he has been instrumental in getting the...
Click to read more »brings the number of new admins this year to 12, continuing the trend of AELECT producing more new admins than RfA. There is now an ongoing debrief about...
Click to read more »2019 AELECT Oct 2024 2015 2019 2020 Discussion SilverLocust (talk · contribs · count · block log) Statement Questions A, CL Dec 1, 2015 None AELECT Oct...
Click to read more »on some other areas instead, doing some maintenance, helping with the WP:AELECT, and some of those other RM's, and only now getting back to long tail work...
Click to read more »is not a valid reason to do it that way. Traditional RfA is for 7 days. AELECT is for 7 days. And our experience with recall, so far, indicates that it...
Click to read more »first set of requests for comment regarding the administrator elections (AELECT) process have come to an end, having reached the following key conclusions:...
Click to read more »and hope to see him in Arbcom. Oh and I guess we have WTT to thank for WP:AELECT. Soni (talk) 11:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC) Daniel (talk) 12:00, 11 November...
Click to read more »the number of admin candidates in 2025 has already jumped to 23. Prior to AELECT, there were only 5 RFAs in the first half in 2025, 3 of which were successful...
Click to read more »formal requirement requires XC. As does being able to vote in RFA or WP:AELECT. So I think logistically it just makes more sense for every admin and ex-admin...
Click to read more »barometer for whether the community supports tool-possession is RfA or AELECT. If someone can pass those, there is consensus for them to have the tools...
Click to read more »your failure was due to your use of rollback, maybe not. If you failed at AELECT and therefore don't know why you failed it's even less clear - we're getting...
Click to read more »indirectly related). If they did resign as admin (or choose not to stand at RFA/AELECT) but not as an arbitrator then I would expect the Committee to actively...
Click to read more »2 May 2026 (UTC) Will come back to you on that once I'm done with some AELECT tasks. I partially agree (and might fully agree upon reflection), and will...
Click to read more »on some other areas instead, doing some maintenance, helping with the WP:AELECT, and some of those other RM's, and only now getting back to long tail work...
Click to read more »Gadget-PrintOptions.js 8578 Captcha-addurl-whitelist 8503 Guidedtour-tour-aelect.js 8295 Gadget-Prosesize.js 8171 Gadget-PrettyLog.js 8050...
Click to read more »(Initiated 665 days ago on 12 October 2024) - Discussion about the upcoming WP:AELECT. Consensus should be not a hard evaluation, it's just time sensitive as...
Click to read more »ever closure of anything (IIRC, at worst it was my 3rd ever) was the WP:AELECT proposal itself. I want to encourage any interested and experienced editor...
Click to read more »the whole request is moot atp, however I’m not expecting to succeed in AELECT because I’ve not been recently active enough, but I digress. It’s more that...
Click to read more »might have been some slight misunderstanding here. Congrats on passing AELECT! --gurkubondinn 12:53, 25 May 2026 (UTC) Been going down the list of the...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Ironically, CfD was a significant part of the reason I ran in AELECT, but I'm unfortunately in about the same boat as Bushranger right now (although...
Click to read more »uncertainty regarding whether any particular ex-admin is even eligible for AELECT and then the inevitable ARCA specific to that case attracting yet more drama...
Click to read more »2005 with 57 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral) and Queen of Hearts (passed AELECT this month with 389 supportm 105 oppose, 122 neutral) did the exact same...
Click to read more »There's a relevant (or is about to be) thread at the AELECT talk page - see Wikipedia talk:AELECT#Organizing the election. CoconutOctopus talk 21:16, 17...
Click to read more »i've seen kind, competent & trustworthy editors fail at RfA (or recently, AELECT) for far far far less. per tbua & Levivich - it's pretty heartbreaking to...
Click to read more »should be speedily closed as premature. It would only be feasible if WP:AELECT were significantly expanded anyway. ~2026-80954-2 (talk) 16:41, 6 February...
Click to read more »unilaterally decide and act upon. If you want these privileges, go to WP:RfA or WP:AELECT. Even then, shutting down a formal discussion requires more than appearances...
Click to read more »April 2026 (UTC) Thanks. SenshiSun (talk) 23:39, 5 April 2026 (UTC) WP:AELECT I am not new editor. I found out this new thing in WP:RFA. I didn't see...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Note that Squirrel Conspiracy (narrowly) failed in the last AELECT. charlotte 👸♥ 05:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC) Oh, that's too bad. I was thinking...
Click to read more »ArbCom in 2012. Since then, you have had two failed RFAs, an unsuccessful AELECT candidacy, and three unsuccessful runs for ArbCom. Can you please describe...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC) The best candidates at both Ace and aelect only had 80% support. To me, this says that there is a -20% support penalty...
Click to read more »instead to compare a hypothetical editor who did not succeed at RFA or AELECT, one potential difference is that inactive admins previously convinced the...
Click to read more »mentions an official voter guide, but that was rejected repeatedly in the AELECT RFCs. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:10, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »bureaucrat discretion in a pure vote. If it's just the same 70% cutoff at WP:AELECT, then there's no need to shoehorn this into the reconfirmation process:...
Click to read more »Oversight and checkusers do, along with some other groups, but admins don't. AELECT is the elected option, RFA is a !vote/consensus building activity. 45dogs...
Click to read more »were 62 RfAs that year, which was a historic low. Even counting all of the AElect candidates as separate RfAs, including those withdrawn before voting began...
Click to read more »have to agree that this whole ordeal might scare others from running for AELECT or RfA, even if they are truly qualified. A CBAN would be too harsh for...
Click to read more »November I think waiting for the patch would probably push back the potential AELECT dates by a significant time with only relatively minor gains to show for...
Click to read more »electing enough admins is a "us" problem. The fix is nominating folks at WP:AELECT, WP:RFA (the very same processes you are defending as set in stone) and...
Click to read more »Ca talk to me! 15:18, 18 July 2025 (UTC) My first time commenting at an AELECT or RFA. I've interacted with jlwoodwa several times. I have never contacted...
Click to read more »Uther has ~48 days to get his act together until the discussion phase for AELECT begins, where his actions will be looked through for one last time until...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. Note: this is a cross-post from WT:AELECT Scrutineers have identified that six votes were cast on December 8 during...
Click to read more »That is not a good combination. I would say you;re welcome to !vote in AElect/RFAs but should not ask questions or go anywhere near a nomination. You'd...
Click to read more »the discussion or are causing friction. The amount of commenting at the AELECT RFC without actually participating in RFA is also concerning. Sounds like...
Click to read more »admins (firstly giving Marcgarver this rather facetious cookie after the AELECT, then deleting Grahm87's admin flair after his RRFA). Asides from some cosmetic...
Click to read more »2 May 2026 (UTC) Will come back to you on that once I'm done with some AELECT tasks. I partially agree (and might fully agree upon reflection), and will...
Click to read more »unilaterally decide and act upon. If you want these privileges, go to WP:RfA or WP:AELECT. Even then, shutting down a formal discussion requires more than appearances...
Click to read more »