Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
guideline. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community. Shortcuts WP:ABFWP:ABF WP:APFWP:APF...
Click to read more »was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC) ABF Freight System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »discussion was: keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC) Template:User ABF (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unused, and who's ever gonna...
Click to read more »Abf started out by editing on Lisa Gerrard right after GerradRecords was blocked. All users extensively edited at the same time on Lyall Brooks. Abf removed...
Click to read more »socket, added by abf /talk to me/ 89.50.114.8 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) see [1] abf /talk to me/ 13:20...
Click to read more »DoITPoMS <-> doitpoms.ac.uk; diff)). Reports 09:12:47, Fri Mar 28, 2008 en:user:ABF <-> doitpoms.ac.uk (0%/8.33%/0% - Added link: www.doitpoms.ac...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith (WP:AAGF) Wikipedia:Assume bad faith (WP:ABF) Wikipedia:Don't bite the newcomers (WP:BITE) Wikipedia:Please bite the newbies...
Click to read more »talk 08:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete it's a cross-namespace-redirect! abf /talk to me/ 11:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete uncyclopedic, no value...
Click to read more »WP:ABF applies to the nominator only. It is sad that a "suspicious" SPA account can open a AfD and I have to prove why would a "new user" is not WP:ABF....
Click to read more »"Talk" 04:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I agree. It fails WP:MUSIC. abf /talk to me/ 17:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »wartime) history of the airfield, not the museum as such, and the Para and ABF Museum is organisationally separate to the Imperial War Museum. --IxK85 (talk)...
Click to read more »MICHAEL Q. 08:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete No real content, not notable. abf /talk to me/ 11:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per above. Way, way too...
Click to read more »third-sources, seems not to be notable at all because he falis WP:MUSIC. abf /talk to me/ 15:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »long-time enabler" He requires it of others, and then ABF. [65] Asks for AGF, then ABF He even continued to ABF during this case. [66] also incivility "my wikistalker...
Click to read more »"Talk" 14:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I can see no notabillity at all. abf /talk to me/ 16:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Operating (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete clearly not notable. abf /talk to me/ 11:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom Clubmarx (talk)...
Click to read more »Bearian (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete not notable at all. abf /talk to me/ 19:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »WP:MUSIC; WP:CRYSTAL okay, this only the next 3 days :P and WP:SOURCES. abf /talk to me/ 19:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete Not exactly WP:CRYSTAL...
Click to read more »--Banime (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:HAMMER WP:CRYSTAL abf /talk to me/ 17:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete this speculation. Cliff...
Click to read more »Beeswaxcandle (talk) 04:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:SOURCES; WP:DICT. abf /talk to me/ 11:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete Already on Wiktionary...
Click to read more »mirror sites. ShoesssS Talk 17:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per above. abf /talk to me/ 10:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Tatarian (talk) 02:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:PORNBIO if not reached. abf /talk to me/ 09:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »WP:CORP. DARTH PANDAduel 14:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per all above. abf /talk to me/ 15:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete, ditto. - Smerdis of Tlön...
Click to read more »05:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination, no real movement. abf /talk to me/ 19:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »would nearly have added A7. There seems to be really no notabillity at all. abf /talk to me/ 13:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - per nom. — neuro(talk)...
Click to read more »talk 19:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC) WP:CRYSTAL; WP:MUSIC; WP:N --> Delete abf /talk to me/ 19:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »WP:NEOLOGISM. McWomble (talk) 06:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination. abf /talk to me/ 09:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete--though I have to say,...
Click to read more »progress user-space essay. This may flesh out to something useful, let's not ABF until it is more developed. — xaosflux Talk 16:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Only...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Merging/redirecting per Gnangarra's proposal seems to be fine. abf /talk to me/ 18:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Merge/redirect per nom. Beagel...
Click to read more »t•c 19:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Merge and redirect to KDE per above. abf /talk to me/ 19:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) delete WP:CRYSTAL abf /talk to me/ 15:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC) As with Boffob; it fails this...
Click to read more »- RD (Talk) 11:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per all above. abf /talk to me/ 13:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete: As above. It also seems...
Click to read more »Tropical Cyclone 15:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete --> WP:N and WP:SOURCES. abf /talk to me/ 16:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable minor fictional...
Click to read more »--Quartermaster (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete no real source. abf /talk to me/ 16:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »unsigned comment added by Kalivd (talk • contribs) Delete fails WP:N totaly. abf /talk to me/ 15:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Delete does not fit WP:N. abf /talk to me/ 19:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »above. Jordan Contribs 06:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination. abf /talk to me/ 18:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. South-East7™Talk/Contribs...
Click to read more »--PaterMcFly (talk) 16:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete cv & not notable. abf /talk to me/ 16:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »at all. gnfnrf (talk) 14:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete as all above. abf /talk to me/ 14:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete as per being made up, original...
Click to read more »August 2017 (UTC) Delete Well, I hope I'm not a "ususal suspect" (c'mon, how ABF can that get?). Fails the GNG. All I see is listing mentions, nothing directly...
Click to read more »this article is clearly not notable and it also has got no real sources. abf /talk to me/ 19:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Redirect to Railfan. No content...
Click to read more »Delete reading self-written poems to toddlers does not make you notable. abf /talk to me/ 10:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Rtyq2 (talk) 18:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC) delete not notable, bad written! abf /talk to me/ 19:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Cyclone 18:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I agree with Juliancolton. abf /talk to me/ 19:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom as COI etc. --Lockley...
Click to read more »04:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete non-notable neologism, per all above. abf /talk to me/ 13:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - As protologism. — neuro(talk)...
Click to read more »25 September 2008 (UTC). Delete Not notable, no real article (mega-stub) abf /talk to me/ 17:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per all above. I can also not really see what this should be... abf /talk to me/ 19:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »the go cart trac, and wikipedia is definetly not the place for doing that. abf /talk to me/ 16:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »itself has not got a huge notabillity, so lets Merge it into Sex in space. abf /talk to me/ 15:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Smerge (selectively merge) into...
Click to read more »creator's talk page. People are watching Special:NewPages eagerly, ready to ABF and ferret out the villainous spammers who seem to be getting subtler and...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per all above, fails nearly any criteria. abf /talk to me/ 19:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC) This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »and till we cant proove this with sources we should delete the article. abf /talk to me/ 15:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete - Clear example of original...
Click to read more »19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete fails basically our notabillity criteria. abf /talk to me/ 13:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per above...Modernist (talk)...
Click to read more »its not notable and redirect it to the album its on according to WP:MUSIC abf /talk to me/ 19:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Redirect to Faith (George Michael...
Click to read more »–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per all above. abf /talk to me/ 16:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete - a violation of WP:DICDEF...
Click to read more »21:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete clearly fails our notabillity-creteria. abf /talk to me/ 22:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - not notable at all. GiantSnowman...
Click to read more »27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I agree with the nominator and Beeblebrox. abf /talk to me/ 18:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete wikipedia is not for neologisms...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete everything was mentioned before. abf /talk to me/ 21:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Clearly an essay and OR...
Click to read more »09:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete Neither notable nor no self-promotion. abf /talk to me/ 19:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete what should that be?? Its definetly not a notable article. abf /talk to me/ 15:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete, as a non-notable neologism...
Click to read more »22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete fails basically our notabillity criteria. abf /talk to me/ 18:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete. So let's recap...
Click to read more »company. TopGearFreak Talk 17:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per A7. abf /talk to me/ 17:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - For reasons stated aboveBritishWatcher...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete makes no real sense, does it? abf /talk to me/ 15:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete, the topic on how kids...
Click to read more »17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete the article itself shows its not notable. abf /talk to me/ 19:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Govvy (talk) 20:52, 17...
Click to read more »doing, blank pages in userspace can be very safely left alone, subject to WP:ABF. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Delete Non-notable sub-stup, per Icewedge's comment. abf /talk to me/ 19:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:WWIN point 3.6 and 2.3.(4) abf /talk to me/ 19:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »attracted much praise... (The article was created by a SPA, so allow me to ABF here that his Wikipedia entry was not written by a random fan among millions...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) User did not react to this; I believe the page is inappropiate. abf /talk to me/ 14:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Delete, obviously (the talk page...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete incomplete, not-needed list. Lets make a category for it. abf /talk to me/ 16:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete: A not needed list. This...
Click to read more »WillOakland (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTMANUAL abf /talk to me/ 11:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete fails notabillity per WP:BIO abf /talk to me/ 17:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOTABLE « PuTTYSchOOL...
Click to read more »Historyof Japan [94] Asks for AGF, then ABF [95] More ABF. [96] Coordinating and multiple editors engaged in ABF ABF [97] also incivility "my wikistalker...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete Its some kind of maths ;) not notable+no sources=no article ;) abf /talk to me/ 19:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Kalivd (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete (speedy) perr all above. abf /talk to me/ 15:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete under WP: CSD#G1...
Click to read more »redirect as it was sugegsted above. The article on its own is not notable. abf /talk to me/ 17:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete No refs to show it satisfies...
Click to read more »do. • Gene93k (talk) 11:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:SOURCE abf /talk to me/ 19:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - Per all of the above...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:BIO and WP:CRYSTAL (if he might be notable somewhen abf /talk to me/ 10:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC) "'Do Not Delete"' I wouldn't be...
Click to read more »--DAJF (talk) 13:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Delete not notable, bad article. abf /talk to me/ 15:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Merge to Alves, Moray. -- Eastmain...
Click to read more »tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot) ABF User is whitelisted: User is in trusted groups sysop, bureaucrat, rollbacker...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Delete no source and no seen notabillity, maybe hoax. abf /talk to me/ 19:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »"Blanking just ... leaves the page available for vandalism", is that per WP:ABF? If you want proper editor oversight, perhaps your place is at Citizendium...
Click to read more »sarcasm, but the author refuses to use the {{humor}} tag on the top (like WP:ABF, for instance), apparently to avoid spoiling the joke [1]. I believe it would...
Click to read more »properly referenced articles. User:Tinucherian, you requested to read WP:ABF. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose T 11:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Keep I again see...
Click to read more »Template:User Copyright Nazi (result: kept deleted) User:nathanrdotcom/Userboxes/ABF (result: undeleted) Template: User evol-X (result: kept deleted) Template:...
Click to read more »04:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC). Deletefails WP:BIO and nearly fulfills CSD#A7 abf /talk to me/ 10:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »21:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete not notable at all, fails WP:MUSIC. abf /talk to me/ 10:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Everything was mentiont. After getting a short overwiev I can just agree. abf /talk to me/ 19:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per (gasp!) DGG. Doctorfluffy...
Click to read more »this. It's a random spat of irrelevant lines. Compare this to WP:LAME, WP:ABF or WP:BRRR which are cohesive and understandable. This is not that. I don't...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete I agree to the comments above. abf /talk to me/ 11:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Jelly Soup (talk) 13:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per all those above. abf /talk to me/ 13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »an explanation. But the request to delete inappropriately rests on an WP:ABF foundation. This sort of page is allowed in userspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk)...
Click to read more »2017-10-09 21:08:11 (UTC): User SeninPazha t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (1) to ABF Freight System (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top)...
Click to read more »Reverted. --Pmedema (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per all above. abf /talk to me/ 19:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete as above - having worked...
Click to read more »not a reason to delete (except BLPs) and assuming this is spam is imply ABF. Claiming that it is long and sprawling and at the same time misses a lot...
Click to read more »real information at all and does not seem to be notable for an own lemma. abf /talk to me/ 19:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom, fails the everything...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete fails our notabillity-creteria. lets use the deletion-hammer ;) abf /talk to me/ 17:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Hammertime in the WP:SNOW. coccyx...
Click to read more »12:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete fails WP:MUSIC and therefore WP:N. abf /talk to me/ 14:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »- Mgm|(talk) 09:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete I agree to all above. abf /talk to me/ 14:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Not notable. --...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Delete! fails basically any notabillity and sources. abf /talk to me/ 13:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »cool, en has got a not-howto rule? Not significant for an encyclopedia. abf /talk to me/ 19:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Delete this how-to guide. Cliff...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Definetly delete; not encyclopedic. Maybe redirect it. abf /talk to me/ 16:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Technically... delete The author...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Delete fails any notabillity, expecially WP:ATHLETE abf /talk to me/ 10:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Alexf(talk)...
Click to read more »tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot) ABF User is whitelisted: User is in trusted groups sysop, bureaucrat, rollbacker...
Click to read more »and in fact I see no real sources to verify the context of the article. abf /talk to me/ 13:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Keep - I believe an indigenous...
Click to read more »above this footballer has not got any notability for this encyclopedia. abf /talk to me/ 15:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Have people got nothing better...
Click to read more »must do so that pops up every time you create a delist nomination. When you ABF and fail to follow clear instructions, you will receive a less than stellar...
Click to read more »16:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I cant see any notabillity at all. abf /talk to me/ 19:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete No real content, no notabillity. abf /talk to me/ 17:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »2404:4402:23F7:2B00:ECBD:F08:ABF:5DE1 (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC) and i used independent and reliable scources 2404:4402:23F7:2B00:ECBD:F08:ABF:5DE1 (talk) 05:51...
Click to read more »draft article submitted by me relating to Alternative Business Funding (ABF), the originator of the three current UK government designated portals. This...
Click to read more »(let's talk • {C•X}) 20:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC) Keep come on. This is WP:ABF; I highly doubt the creator nor any users of this box are secretly McDonald’s...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) keep I believe it somehow fits our criteria to be notable. abf /talk to me/ 19:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Keep. This is a candidate for...
Click to read more »if it would be needed you could simply create a wiki-text formula for it. abf /talk to me/ 15:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Image:She Thinks His Name Was...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete there is nothing more to say than Voceditenore allready said. abf /talk to me/ 18:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - For all reasons listed...
Click to read more »(citation from the article, gfdl, editor see history) ---> WP:CRYSTAL --> delete abf /talk to me/ 17:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Albums aren't automatically...
Click to read more »Practitioners, Public Relations Society of America There is no such thing as ABF/AGF when it comes to PR participation, because PR is agnostic to the success...
Click to read more »davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC) I have direct knowledge of such ABF astroturfing firms and - in some cases - their specific activities. I wouldn't...
Click to read more »user space and is not at odds with the goals of this project. It's AGF, not ABF - the onus is on you to show that a page is being used as a webhost. VQuakr...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per G11 because the whole article consists of advertisement. abf /talk to me/ 11:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »worth keeping. I just get fried by all the false and, in fact, irrelevant ABF charges flying about, and this MfD just came to my attention. I'm astonished...
Click to read more »quite evident. -- Banjeboi 14:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC) Nice example of WP:ABF. Unsourced bios get nuked, if they get sourced instead then Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »is background unqualified clerking of SPI. Your nomination is a lot of WP:ABF without citing evidence. If the other pages have better cases for deletion...
Click to read more »improve the article. Temerarius (talk) 08:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Unless, ABF, a good platform for city council is all it really is. Elephas X. Maximus...
Click to read more »practical use. AllBestFaith (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Thank you, ABF. That hadn't occurred to me, and I even read about the sailors stealing "floatwood"...
Click to read more »Delete I agree to all above. I can see no necessarity for this article. abf /talk to me/ 17:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Am appropriating the...
Click to read more »Learnerktm (talk • contribs) 14:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC) Right, I think what ABF was trying to say is that it would require permission from *both* Coursera...
Click to read more »of knoledge rather detailed for a newcomer, including LAME, SOCK, AGF and ABF, I would say that Rothchild himself is a sockpuppet of someone else, and...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Sigh. I should have caught that (especially when working from an ABF-starting perspective as I was here). I guess I'm too involved now to press...
Click to read more »--SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per all above. abf /talk to me/ 19:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete but let the user move...
Click to read more »Non-notable Hazel77 talk 19:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Delet not notable at all. abf /talk to me/ 22:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »14:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete for beeing an un-notable advertise. abf /talk to me/ 16:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. "Academic Assistance"...
Click to read more »blacklist. Link is not on the whitelist. Link is not on the monitor list. ABF User is whitelisted: User is in trusted groups sysop, bureaucrat, rollbacker...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC)) Delete no notabillity at all, as far as I can see. abf /talk to me/ 19:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »deleted "User:Nathanrdotcom/Userboxes/ABF" (don't) If you check the userbox, it was (and is) linked to WP:ABF (which is a parody). "Don't" is not a reason...
Click to read more »author originally linked this page to the page of the episode. I know it's ABF, but based on his history of edits, I'm saying it's deliberate. —Ryūlóng...
Click to read more »19 September 2013 (UTC) Please crop File:ABF logo w.svg File:ABF logo w t.svg File:ABF logo r.svg File:ABF logo r t.svg Article(s): Arbetarnas bildningsförbund...
Click to read more »also be beat with the clue stick (and blocked if he or she continues to ABF). JuJube (talk) 12:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Speedy Keep - no deletion rationale...
Click to read more »Delete we cant host an article for any manga. No notabillity, per nomination. abf /talk to me/ 17:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Why not? Running out of space...
Click to read more »20:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC) In Afghanistan the equivalent body to MLB is ABF( Afghanistan baseball Federation). It is the top body which runs the baseball...
Click to read more »21 April 2019 (UTC) For goodness sake, @Auric. Apart from the outrageous ABF, the point is that this pseudo-portal is a useless WP:REDUNDANTFORK. The...
Click to read more »I was thinking the same thing - that or a meatpuppet, but didn't want to ABF. Wisdom89 (T / C) 07:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC) I'll list the SSP report here...
Click to read more »practices have been followed, and if followed, documented. Do you want me to ABF and presume that a nom did a BEFORE and didn't follow best practices by posting...
Click to read more »neither needed nor helpful. -- Visviva (talk) 03:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC) WP:ABF has no place here. These lists being "helpful", is, A) unpersuasive and B)...
Click to read more »article talk page, and their immediate use of WP:PERSONAL attacks and WP:ABF are indicative that any discussion with them will be futile. Past that, the...
Click to read more »we can do this job properly. Samsara 03:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Wow, ABF much? Particularly ironic considering your own replies to Hafs in other nominations...
Click to read more »provided, it suggests that a user was attempting to make a point, dont want to ABF, but it just appears that way. Twenty Years 13:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete there is no need for this list. abf /talk to me/ 19:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete, utterly pointless, grows...
Click to read more »Wikipedia policies. RMHED. 20:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Lovely example of WP:ABF. Now read the rationale I gave above, and see if you can discern whether...
Click to read more »voting to delete because they object to what it publishes. Yes, I will WP:ABF in this case. --Dragon695 (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC) "One of the first"...
Click to read more »added in this diff: s7y.us/ggp (1, 11, 1, 1) 2008-11-29 22:53:59 (UTC): User ABF (talk - contribs; 17916) to Neuberg im Burgenland (diff - undo) - Link: s7y...
Click to read more »makes that IP look strange too. Undeath (talk) 13:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC) WP:ABF. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC) You're also suspected...
Click to read more »19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination, fails basically WP:ATHLETE. abf /talk to me/ 13:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:32...
Click to read more »02:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC) This is turning into a bit of a back-and-forth WP:ABF. I realized that fighting for my nominated list was a lost cause and that...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC) WP:ABF much? Here's the searches: Google Web, Google News, and [1]. Redoing those...
Click to read more »page which actually has a point, we also have pages like WP:MMORPG and WP:ABF so why not? In urgent need of a wikification though. SalaSkan 15:06, 3 June...
Click to read more »have any of those arguments been put forth? It sure sounds like you are ABF... JoelleJay (talk) 02:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC) See above: "the only coverage...
Click to read more »User ABF (talk - contribs; 11089) to Blues (diff - undo) - Link: www.wirz.de/music/yazoo/grafik/1012b4.jpg. 2008-09-24 18:50:02 (UTC): User ABF (talk...
Click to read more »both these editors may be involved with the subject? So I'm going with WP:ABF. Sting au Buzz Me... 22:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Agree. The two voting against...
Click to read more »created in three days time (that's a ton of passwords to lose, and puts me in ABF territory) and they tried to create more on WP:ACC along with asking (via...
Click to read more »know what RfC you are talking about, though it sounds plausible (not the ABF accusation of starting an RfC with an "intended" outcome, of course) - that...
Click to read more »is no other rationale; you are displaying a rather shocking amount of WP:ABF. Neither my post nor Miami's was a "rebuttal " at all, but rather kindly...
Click to read more »;) DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 22:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:LC abf /talk to me/ 18:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Delete I'm a proponent of lists...
Click to read more »Elizabeth Anker Ankor Children's Choir Ansbach Bach Festival Choir & Orchestra (ABF) Sonia Anschütz MB Mátyás Antál Ensemble Anthémis Michaela Anthony MB Orchestra...
Click to read more »22:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) ABF Technology (edit, talk, history, links) — http://www.steelshieldtech.com.hk/Technical_ABF_Explanation.html. CSBot reporting...
Click to read more »02:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC) This is turning into a bit of a back-and-forth WP:ABF. I realized that fighting for my nominated list was a lost cause and that...
Click to read more »Whitelist: cluebot <-> * (Bots don't have a COI) 2008-09-23 19:18:49 (UTC): User ABF (talk - contribs; 8707) to Mike Oldfield (diff - undo) - Link: www.tubular...
Click to read more »www.braintumorsymptoms.net (1, 8, 1, 1) 2008-11-10 14:52:58 (UTC): User ABF (talk - contribs; 17916) to Brain tumor (diff - undo) - Link: www.braintumorsymptoms...
Click to read more »gqvenda (André Defrain) carolinatavares123 RCtheViking (Rui Conduto) MikelAbf (Michel AbiFadel) Martagallegorodenas CafyFab (Sebastiao da Cunha) Caetanolacerda...
Click to read more »is slightly more circumspect than that, but I agree that this circumspect ABF is undesirable in a welcome template. I suggest blanking. --SmokeyJoe (talk)...
Click to read more »gonna happen. Joefromrandb (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Talk about WP:ABF.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Keep - There was a time the article...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete' because the article basically fails WP:V and WP:MUSIC. abf /talk to me/ 16:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Keep per WP:MUSIC. This band...
Click to read more »seems to be the frong license. Fair use is not possible, because its unused. abf /talk to me/ 14:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. abf /talk to me/ 17:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »um_study_meth_may_lessen_stroke_damage/. 2008-12-09 13:47:57 (UTC): User ABF (talk - contribs; 466) to Affirmative action (diff - undo) - Link: www.boston...
Click to read more »claiming double-spaced sentences are "paragraphs", it's not unreasonable or ABF to clarify. The source looks like a standard match recap... JoelleJay (talk)...
Click to read more »Stifle (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BIO completly. abf /talk to me/ 15:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BIO / decidedly...
Click to read more »appears to be inaccurate, but calling it intentional falsehood is a bit ABF when the addition of a single strategically placed word ("online" before...
Click to read more »first talk page contributions directed at various editors, showing that ABF was there from the beginning, are 31 Jul 2012 VM's first post to talk page:...
Click to read more »December 2022 (UTC) That said, the use of unperson wasn't nice (IMO more ABF:ing than memory hole), whoever it was directed at. In newspeak wikispeak...
Click to read more »=P —Dinoguy1000 17:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Delete not-needed template. abf /talk to me/ 16:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Keep - I withdraw my nomination...
Click to read more »lack of detail available on that sort of stuff, and though it may be a bit ABF-y of me to factor in previous semesters of EPs, I lean to thinking that until...
Click to read more »specific actions. Even done very carefully, very specifically, without ABF at all, ABF is assumed by too many, and responses are conditioned by this assumption...
Click to read more »go without saying that your two comments here are a clear example of WP:ABF and WP:PA. No one is above community policies and guidelines.--Jasper Deng...
Click to read more »--SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC) @SmokeyJoe, I resent the pile of ABF in your last sentence, and urge you to withdraw it. I did not supervote;...
Click to read more »WP:MUSIC; WP:CRYSTAL okay, this only the next 3 days :P and WP:SOURCES. abf /talk to me/ 19:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete Not exactly WP:CRYSTAL...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Delete I agree, I can see no sense in the given redirect. abf /talk to me/ 18:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Note - retargeted to William...
Click to read more »June 2008 (UTC) Sorry. WP:NOTEVER.... if someone cares to be realistic (or ABF as some would call it) enough to write it. Clearly unsuitable as an administrator...
Click to read more »basis in policy sufficiently. Your implication of some ulterior motive is WP:ABF-y. There is probably some cabal of editors editing on an ideological basis...
Click to read more »05:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC) support in common to my evaluation criterions __ ABF __ - - Talk - - 16:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Support good candidate; I don't...
Click to read more »User de:ABF (talk - contribs) to de:Epidemie (diff). Links: www.ecdc.eu.int/ www.eurosurveillance.org/ www.rki.de. 2007-09-05 08:14:24: User de:ABF (talk...
Click to read more »but I don't think this is anything that merits any sort of deep dive into "ABF". Primefac (talk) 18:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC) @PiratePuppy: Can you please...
Click to read more »co-religionists, without being per se non-independent. Assuming otherwise ABFs against an external organization. Jclemens (talk) 06:39, 23 December 2016...
Click to read more »(UTC) 18:45, 27 March 2006 MarkSweep deleted "User:Nathanrdotcom/Userboxes/ABF" (don't) This is not even remotely an offensive userbox. If certain admins...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:ATHLETE and the comments above, expecially Road Wizard's abf /talk to me/ 10:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Comment What part of WP:ATHLETE...
Click to read more »something was kept doesn't guarantee future keeping. I'm going to ignore your ABF on the rest of this as I have no intention of getting in a back and forth...
Click to read more »to do! But as you say, you do ABF quite a bit; but recognizing that is a great start towards fixing it. Showing less ABF and more AGF to new users will...
Click to read more »thinly-veiled threats. — Werdna talk 08:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Very BITEy, ABF template, goodbye. MBisanz talk 08:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Delete. Too WP:BITEey...
Click to read more »AAN AAO AAP AAQ AAR AAS AAT AAU AAV AAW AAX AAY AAZ ABA ABB ABC ABD ABE ABF ABG ABH ABI ABJ ABK ABL ABM ABN ABO ABP ABQ ABR ABS ABT ABU ABV ABW ABX ABY...
Click to read more »Resolved – User warned, nothing more enwiki can do about this personal attack. abf /talk to me/ 11:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Why did you bring a Commons dispute...
Click to read more »fact of the current discussion in the community regarding Tor, I think ABF's contribution to the discussion would be helpful and enlightening. He puts...
Click to read more »mentioned in the discussion above indicated those categorys are not needed. abf /talk to me/ 19:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC) The above is preserved as an...
Click to read more »change a logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8700:8FB3:31F0:ABF:E3E8:CBF7 (talk) 03:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC) You would need to create an...
Click to read more »Examples of assumption of bad faith "who want to pretend" is ABF "you want to suppress" is ABF "people who boilerplate voted delete that don't even know...
Click to read more »reason that I can discern; now you side-step the whole issue of civility and ABF alltogether and patronizingly tell me to "calm down" - I assure you, I am...
Click to read more »nothing wrong with reporting an editor who has a long history of incivility, ABF and edit warring for continuing just that. It is incredible to get abuse...
Click to read more »wartime) history of the airfield, not the museum as such, and the Para and ABF Museum is organisationally separate to the Imperial War Museum. --IxK85 (talk)...
Click to read more »Unwarranted attack and par for the course for this user, who consistently raises ABF accusations.Jytdog (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC) 3RR exemption 2....
Click to read more »SA's coming here rather than the acu talk page was extremely hostile and ABF on his part. If I'm gonna trust SA, he's gonna have to earn that trust by...
Click to read more »[citation needed]— Dædαlus Contribs 04:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:ABF — Ched : ? 04:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC) What the hell did I ever do do you...
Click to read more »Riley Financial," Fortune, 2021. (b) "2021 Most Innovative Companies," ABF Journal, 2021. While we’re on the subject, let me also offer — both for the...
Click to read more »overwhelming evidence to the contrary and in the context of civil/battleground/ABF/HOUND/etc. problems. If civility, AGF, and hounding are policies, they must...
Click to read more »hand. What does that mean? I don't understand it fully, though I have a ABF idea…L3X1 My Complaint Desk 03:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC) @L3X1: Simply put...
Click to read more »seem to be more centred around opinion and go against Wikipedia rules—so WP:ABF then? ╟─TreasuryTag►hemicycle─╢ 19:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Keep per WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Support, most definitely. fish&karate 07:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC) sure! abf /talk to me/ 08:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Support, with pleasure. --Tone 08:24...
Click to read more »into other long standing essays as if WP:SEI is similarly accepted to WP:ABF [4] By the next day February 2 a number of editors went to the author via...
Click to read more »African Union Sport policies of the African Union 8 Template:Liga ABF -> 2010–11 Liga ABF BM Castro Urdiales BM Monóvar BM Murcia BM Remudas BM Sagardia...
Click to read more »Group" (gross ABF) attack on myself (again) and two other editors unveiled attempt to recruit help to launch a revert war another grossly ABF attack another...
Click to read more »viewpoints for political reasons. ” [36] same convo, when told they were doing abf, they said they did not assume bad faith, they knew other editor was bad...
Click to read more »viewpoints for political reasons. ” [36] same convo, when told they were doing abf, they said they did not assume bad faith, they knew other editor was bad...
Click to read more »and WP:CIVIL violations, WP:IDHT, general disruption, WP:ABF, POV pushing, persistent WP:ABF and probably throw in WP:TE. For a week (ish) old account...
Click to read more »And his blanking of my comments on his talk page saying that he will WP:ABF in his dealings with me puts that option out the window. BigDunc (talk) 23:09...
Click to read more »has been made.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC) Meh. ABF is ABF, not a personal attack. If that is the reason for the block then fine...
Click to read more »decide to look at his statement here, and the series of directly false or ABF charges he has made; I suggest, however, avoiding a focus on Fringe science...
Click to read more »14:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete fails notabillity per WP:MUSIC. abf /talk to me/ 15:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Passes WP:MUSIC...
Click to read more »name of the company may constitute a violation of WP:NPOV may even be WP:ABF and WP:COI. I would recommend to forget it and move on. But what you do outside...
Click to read more »(UTC) When undoing another admin's block (except for obvious mistakes or ABF) then you should ALWAYS contact that administrator prior to removing the...
Click to read more »with this but i think we should message the person... What do you think? abf /talk to me/ 18:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC) WP:RBI. Tiptoety talk 18:50,...
Click to read more »my what I am lying about. Clearly. This is the height of incivility and ABF in my view. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC) (edit conflict)...
Click to read more »overly wordy, and both have done at least a little ABF, but the relative proportion of AGF to ABF has been very asymmetrical. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:50...
Click to read more »Last edited with his alternate account with an RfA vote on April 24, 2019. ABF (talk · contribs · count) – Last edit April 3, 2013, last global edit on...
Click to read more »must do so that pops up every time you create a delist nomination. When you ABF and fail to follow clear instructions, you will receive a less than stellar...
Click to read more »hope of getting administrative assitance and not for snide remarks and wp:abfing. Smith Jones (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC) Gentlemen, enough of this...
Click to read more »not sure I'd be comfortable handing over access to something with as much ABF potential as STiki). ‑ Iridescent 18:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Well I heard that :)...
Click to read more »29 June 2019 (UTC) I am not known for satire, nor too fussed if someone ABFs regarding me: take it as it is written. - Sitush (talk) 15:03, 29 June 2019...
Click to read more »Template:User Copyright Nazi (result: kept deleted) User:nathanrdotcom/Userboxes/ABF (result: undeleted) Template: User evol-X (result: kept deleted) Template:...
Click to read more »wikipedian, but I believe that he's corrigible. Alas, there is a lot of WP:ABF on all sides in the wider conflict. Balkans, y'know. Duja► 16:12, 15 February...
Click to read more »a rat. Richard3120 (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC) There's no need to ABF. Not knowing about WP:CANVAS or our editing norms is consitent with being...
Click to read more »sums it up nicely. Harmanprtjhj (talk) ) Just noting that the amount of WP:ABF and deceptive tricks used by these "brand new accounts" and the [Banned user...
Click to read more »Talk 17:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Ah. You again. Thanks for adding to the ABF. Guido den Broeder 22:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC) I'm sorry; I didn't realize...
Click to read more »support of the nomination, which is rather baffling. Are you aiming your WP:ABF at the intended target? But if you do think he or she is disregarding an...
Click to read more »trying to be 'funny' actually encourages trolls. Moreover, it encourages ABF in regular users; and calling someone a troll, as opposed to matter-of-factly...
Click to read more »13 February 2011 (UTC) It is not outing to accuse a user of SP. It may be ABF and PA (but as tyhe user appears to have adminted it this is not the case)...
Click to read more »unjustified? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Well, the ABF variant of my first reaction was that this may be a sockpuppet who casts...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) No problem, I realize my comments may have come off as harsh/ABF too. Spicy (talk) 23:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »use IAR “in a proper manner”? Your comments here seem to be intended to WP:ABF, make WP:personal attacks, and make a WP:POINT against users you think aren’t...
Click to read more »restriction on DePiep? Would have been damned useful to know during this ABF shitshow. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:13, 24 November 2019 (UTC) That was...
Click to read more »matter to anyone here? He shouldn't even have had to ask. And this constant ABF sock puppet nonsense directed at someone just because they're editing correctly...
Click to read more »warning QG shows softness and callousness, and am hatting my (largely) hot and ABF comments just below. Still, John is right and we shouldn't tolerate such...
Click to read more »assumed your good faith. And once again, you replied with incivility and ABF, this time as a scarcastic allegation of bad faith. My model of fair and...
Click to read more »that you strike your comments later". SA is supposed to be careful to avoid ABF and incivility. I don't see that. Do you see that? When I pointed out that...
Click to read more »only answer I get seems to be a case of "I don't hear it" coupled with WP:ABF behaviour (only one comment on the talk page, and no response afterwards)...
Click to read more »15 October 2020 (UTC) Again, none of those sources is bad, despite your ABF that they are. It’s dishonest and beneath collegial editing. Gleeanon 15:11...
Click to read more »Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC) That's a remarkable amount of ABF crammed into one paragraph. As far as I can tell "...and it was written by...
Click to read more »definitely. RockManQ (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Support per all above. abf /talk to me/ 13:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Support - I can find nothing that...
Click to read more »of the nominator as a sockpuppet simply because they're new smacks of WP:ABF :( Please be civil. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) I didn't say the...
Click to read more »05:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC) (ec) Without bothering to verify it was true is ABF on your part, and the filter is massive overreach. If you watch the Oscar...
Click to read more »function f(x) = 2sec2 x over the interval [-π/4, π/4]. f(c) = [1/(b - a)]∫abf(x)dx f(c) = [1/(π/4 - [-π/4])]∫-π/4π/4(2sec2) x)dx f(c) = [1/(π/2)]2 • (tan...
Click to read more »demonstrates the potential for the minsiterpretation of the presence of WP:ABF & is an overreaction to CadenS's admittedly minor conflicts in the issue...
Click to read more »process and Jytdog never said one word about anything to anyone. He just ABF. He attempted to link to the history of the essay - most of which was not...
Click to read more »problematic edits should be undone. The answer is yes in both cases. WP:ABF is misplaced here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC) @WJBscribe:...
Click to read more »explanation persistently even being reverted by 2 different editors. I can ABF and just give the 4th lv warning or report it here, I guess I will do it...
Click to read more »sometimes reasonable. Otherwise, all reason goes out of the window, with WP:ABF being the default. I see that editors on the WP:NORN page are being referred...
Click to read more »viewed and most important articles, and be met with this sort of insulting, ABF snark from an admin who should know better. I should note that the very same...
Click to read more »have seen a mover vandal. He must have read WP:BEANS. We should update WP:ABF this is notable for the article! "My user id has 41 so all Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »reply from BatteryIncluded? It is, in my opinion, a wonderful example of WP:ABF, and does not account for the edit warring and refusal to discuss on the...
Click to read more »Tropical Cyclone 15:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete --> WP:N and WP:SOURCES. abf /talk to me/ 16:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable minor fictional...
Click to read more »16:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I cant see any notabillity at all. abf /talk to me/ 19:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »aggressive. [338] - ABF [339] [340] [341] - Older users not spared [342] [343] corrected again [344] [345] - Untrue Assertion [346] - ABF [347] [348] [349]...
Click to read more »threads at random, and see if they get the same impression I do. Maybe I'm ABFing too much for obvious reasons. Levivich 18:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Once the...
Click to read more »and stupid" <--WP:ASSERTIONS, ABF "Forget summoning your friends, and fight your own battles. " <--WP:ASSERTIONS, ABF, battleground "STOOPID - brainless...
Click to read more »clarify the intention, perhaps the essay could be rewritten in the style of WP:ABF, which seems harmless and does not have the air of recommending anti-social...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:08, 6 December 2011 (UTC) It is already clear to me that you use WP:ABF. I have asked you before to remove the comments about the unrelated block...
Click to read more »me be removed/stricken from WP:RS/N and Talk:Kołobrzeg, that Radeksz stop ABF on my part, and if he cannot, that a mediator be appointed or Radeksz stay...
Click to read more »Cantaloupe2 (talk) 13:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Just a note, I defend my ABF. We do not continue to AGF in the face of overwhelming and obvious evidence...
Click to read more »Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 aa aba 1 ab abb 2 ab abc 3 ab abd 4 ab abe 5 ab abf 6 ab abg 7 ab abh 8 ac abi 9...
Click to read more »in other editors. We have had that discussion before; please strike the ABF. If you or any other editor would like to examine, check, or re-run the methodology...
Click to read more »Australia. The league is governed by the Australian Baseball Federation (ABF)." Our article on professional baseball also includes the ABL. The next lead...
Click to read more »something I call "Assuming Negative Notability" (although it may be a subset of ABF), which I'm seeing distressingly often at AfD. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank...
Click to read more »19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination, fails basically WP:ATHLETE. abf /talk to me/ 13:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:32...
Click to read more »requested that Etienne self-revert and issued a warning for personal attacks/ABF on usertalk here [Etienne removed the edit summary] and said that WP:ONUS...
Click to read more »nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) it might be vaguely ABF for me to delete Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DABIGGESTITALIANO2; can...
Click to read more »acting with good faith. Ronnotel (talk) 19:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) The ABF is blatant. Stop it, Ronnotel. There is now what might be called sock puppetry...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete there is no need for this list. abf /talk to me/ 19:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete, utterly pointless, grows...
Click to read more »it is exempted. Quote from Jytdog (over an hour later): “More of the same ABF accusations. I disagree with the user-space exemption, as Canoe is specifically...
Click to read more »still pursue this? Beach drifter (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC) WP:ABF? Honestly, I don't seek to get anyone indefed unless there's a good reason;...
Click to read more »would tell anyone that. This is just a case of misinterpretation and WP:ABF. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 05:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC) There are four pages in her...
Click to read more »only one who notices that while VM takes me to ANI for essentially ABFing, he is ABFing much worse about me? I struck the hoax comments, but he won't strike...
Click to read more »are. We are told to WP:AGF but there is a limit of it and we have to WP:ABF Igor Berger (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Well, this is AN & not ANI...
Click to read more »(talk) Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Support! abf /talk to me/ 13:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Support - Ready for the tools...
Click to read more »— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC) I cant either, well except by ABF. Its not as if many of these edits are even needed.Slatersteven (talk) 09:11...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support Duh. iMatthew 16:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Yes! Support! abf /talk to me/ 17:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Support I like your work with...
Click to read more »dispute is over the wording of something in the infobox. I find it a bit ABF that the creator of this thread demands actions as said above. Edit summaries...
Click to read more »continued his/her behavior. Not the first time you do this pre-emptive WP:ABF shit and unfortunately not the last... Also, it appears that you have tried...
Click to read more »their report, and it was malformed, but that's still no reason to take WP:ABF seriously. Please keep that in mind. (Whoops. Seems the Reply script broke...
Click to read more »as the closing admin of the MfD and I found it exceptionally uncivil and ABF.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Yeah, let's avoid the...
Click to read more »this is why I reported you rather than let it slide, because you are WP:ABF and casting aspersions on the other involved editors. You just can't stand...
Click to read more »means that she could have been blocked for disruption, BATTLE, edit warring, ABF as well. All in all, Mariam83 has been having conflicts w/ around 5 admins...
Click to read more »account name." (Like Nansen's ship, you know?) Please refrain from those WP:ABF comments: "Everyone can see this for what it is, dot dot dot..." Actually...
Click to read more »com/interview/stephen-fry-the-internet. 2008-11-16 21:49:34 (UTC): User ABF (talk - contribs; 17817) to Stephen Fry (diff - undo) - Link: www.videojug...
Click to read more »October 2022 (UTC) This is straight up heading towards a WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT/WP:ABF block if you keep this mentality and can't handle being contacted on your...
Click to read more »more than once as already shown, how you have erupted with both unnecessary ABF personalizations, and imaginings of self-persecution, to posts I've made...
Click to read more »--Niemti (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Ironic Support considering the WP:ABF that I was subjected to last week regarding this exact same editor. The battle...
Click to read more »unreliable because someone could be lying about it. Of course, it is WP:ABF to assume that a person is lying about a broadcast. --Farix (Talk) 00:20...
Click to read more »16:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC) support in common to my evaluation criterions __ ABF __ - - Talk - - 16:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Support I disagree with your position...
Click to read more »Straczynski’s TV Series, Babylon 5. London: Virgin, 1997. If there's an ABF that none of these contain sufficient non-trivial independent commentary...
Click to read more »botched: your post[4] at WP:VPP also has no link. Instead you make an WP:ABF about my objection and ramble on about the substantive issue rather than...
Click to read more »for clarification ("is what you're saying?") a "misrepresentation"? You ABF in literally every comment directed to me (for example, my comments make...
Click to read more »to view my contribs, there are no issues nor warnings of civility nor WP:ABF, and I resent this editor for implying as such. Yngvarr (c) 18:55, 28 March...
Click to read more »WP:OWNERSHIP if someone disagrees with him, that person is fodder for him to ABF. Its also a content dispute. I wonder what PAG outlines consequences for...
Click to read more »here is rather harsh, and does the opposite of LOL AGF. It's more of an ABF, wouldn't you say? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Resolved...
Click to read more »one who asked Andreasegde to calm down, after he posted this call to WP:ABF [37] (in Andreasegde's favour, he has not followed through on this threat)...
Click to read more »something terribly wrong.--Flamgirlant 09:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC) You're ABF again and again. I misread Michael's comments as "accusing someone of meat...
Click to read more »and this comment, and calls one of my comments a "blatant response to WP:ABF" and leaves such an uncalled message. I don't know what should be done about...
Click to read more »page. Instead, I thought of informing it in admin’s notice as it is per WP:ABF. Thank you. --Avinesh Jose T 13:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Hello all you...
Click to read more »front of everyone that who is disrupting whom with all magical words and WP:ABF. It is all about regarding the deleted article nominated by me that you have...
Click to read more »'interpretations' were of course brilliant[...]" "That's a nice little piece of ABF right there. I wonder if any wandering admin is watching out for CIVIL violations...
Click to read more »26 April 2007 (UTC) It's cool. I don't think either of us intended to WP:ABF with the other. — coelacan — 03:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Can someone please...
Click to read more »assumptions and trolling. It is not the opinion. It is the trolling and the ABF. Mercury 23:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Since there is already an RFC on this...
Click to read more »crossing the line, and a whole lot of false alarms and exaggerated offenses or ABFing. SJ and TB need separation so I'd support a warning to stay away from TB...
Click to read more »suggest to me trolling, rather complete disbelief. I'm not sure we can WP:ABF here. Just because their first edits are biased doesn't mean we should permanently...
Click to read more »actually has read and understood the thing before making his first edit, we ABF and kick him out calling him a sock! There's no harm in at least monitoring...
Click to read more »harassment. WAS 4.250 (talk) 15:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC) He was warned to not ABF and not to jump to conclusions, and then this. MBisanz talk 15:31, 13 August...
Click to read more »04:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC) As an admin, you shouldn't be reminded that AGF and ABF do not apply to dealing with criticism. I have not stated that you are intended...
Click to read more »AKRadeckiSpeaketh 05:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC) It's devolved into a stagnant cesspit of ABF and incivility. One of the participants, Anittas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »instances where SoV has actually broken any policy, and done nothing but WP:ABF on anything SoV does. My suggestion would be a one-way interaction ban on...
Click to read more »out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Not wishing to ABF, but Marven Twen's 61 edits - from their very first one - show very clear...
Click to read more »reality is that there is only one. Iaritmioawp also makes a wholly false ABF assertion that I go to ANI the first chance you get. That too is demonstrably...
Click to read more »:P <redacted> Kalakitty talk 00:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Oh. Sorry for the ABF then; blame the sockpuppets. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 00:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »hatefulness is beyond the pale. Why are we putting up with the relentless ABF from this editor? Support also a short AP2 tban for Pkeets, maybe things'll...
Click to read more »reinserted and explained: "Thank you. I don't give a shit. If he gets to WP:ABF others, I get to insult him. Insults are more useful than politeness when...
Click to read more »What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC) We seem to have a bit of ABF around today, which doesn't help at all. Still, it is true that there are...
Click to read more »unwarranted block and has continued to act in bad faith (see above link about ABF). I also believe that block should be annotated since no once will ever look...
Click to read more »lecturing others about collegiality and pillars. You accuse others of WP:ABF but demonstrate it in your above paragraph by crystal-balling "intent". You...
Click to read more »implement a unanimous UCfD decision will be reverted by the user, it'd be ABF to make that assumption. If, however, the userpage is corrected for its violation...
Click to read more »09:59, 15 November 2011 (UTC) It is a bit disappointing to see all that ABF and tl;dr misinformedness in one comment. If you are unwilling to spend some...
Click to read more »I know this is frustrating, but here you seem to have assumed bad faith. ABF is drama inducing. You've been around long enough to know that. It didn't...
Click to read more »community should accept that we don't know what we don't know, and should not WP:ABF the Arbs. On the other hand, I think that ArbCom should be reasonably strict...
Click to read more »tends to be terse, sometimes bordering on the enigmatic. When combined with ABF, this can be very puzzling to his target. When he was still editing primarily...
Click to read more »request? 98.248.33.198 (talk) 05:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Roux, yet again, ABF on IP editors. Really, its a founding issue. It's not going to change. Get...
Click to read more »the editcountitis, I just can't get past how this really comes across as ABF ("Assuming bad faith", as opposed to AGF - "Assuming good faith") I have...
Click to read more »Pagename Redirects Wikipedia:Assume bad faith WP:ABF Wikipedia:Clinic for Wikipediholics WP:CLINIC Wikipedia:Complete bollocks WP:BALLS, WP:CB Wikipedia:Department...
Click to read more »mailing list fiasco (let me stress the "one of the things" before somebody ABFs me here) is that it has now given cynical manipulators like Anti-Nationalist...
Click to read more »appropriate, and there may even be reliable source regarding it. If I were to ABF, which I'm not, I'd think that this was a trick question, asked hoping that...
Click to read more »X is many (apparently more than 20% is not "many" for some). There is no ABF involved, he created these errors, I didn't assume he did. My end game? To...
Click to read more »move— Preceding unsigned comment added by Smith Jones (talk • contribs) Appears to be ABF/incivil to people on multiple occasions. Was in an RV war at Christmas, and...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC) Except that I'm not a denialist, so quit the ABF. I'm not even a skeptic. I just believe in NPOV articles that don't violate...
Click to read more »and and... trying... trying... nyyyyyyyrghhhhhhh ah I can't stretch my ABF far enough right now to believe Karmafist is him. Although it is tempting...
Click to read more »need to boomerang the IP, as I imagine someone might suggest, but their ABF/non-communication viewpoint will need to change if they continue. Nosebagbear...
Click to read more »Section is replete with mudslinging, NPA's, ABF, and generally poor conduct. Mr rnddude (talk) 00:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC) Of course you think the...
Click to read more »(UTC). my brave fellow -- I didn't expect you would stoop to repeating your ABF personal attack. More importantly however, there is a huge difference between...
Click to read more »general non-constructive note on his talk page [9] , he responded with WP:ABF attitude, quote: "if its not a problem I dont accept edits starting with...
Click to read more »semi-permanent snipefest, and if it isn't on probation it should be. A campaign of ABF has ensued, in which every little error I make is blown into a malicious...
Click to read more »local newspapers in areas not remotely near Kidwelly), which sets off my WP:ABF right there. ‑ Iridescent 17:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Well, after reading the...
Click to read more »has been added, this has gone way beyond WP:AGF - it's now a case of WP:ABF (and it's not the least bit funny) --ArmadilloFromHell 00:19, 23 November...
Click to read more »has a clear battleground mentality and I don't want to get dragged into a ABF fuelled Wiki-crusade everytime I edit. - Kevo327 (talk) 09:22, 24 March 2022...
Click to read more »administrators with psychic powers, because I know you didn't just endorse WP:ABF, right? So, if you could just please indef block such users before they make...
Click to read more »I have encountered MSK. The constant misrepresentation, POV, smears, and ABF are very corrosive to the encyclopædia. bobrayner (talk) 21:41, 21 February...
Click to read more »there may be some I've missed. – iridescent 01:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Hmmm… ABF is right more often than it's wrong. – iridescent 03:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »00:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC) watching Battlebots. that lloks lot a lot of WP:ABF. done for the day. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC) I would...
Click to read more »informing me (the User who warned Jagz about asking the other parent and for ABFing on SLR's talk page) that the issue is still on-going adds further weight...
Click to read more »nomination's last para asking editors to avoid unevidenced assertions ... and your ABF claim that this an attempt to Americanize Wikipedia is wholly unevidenced...
Click to read more »criminal in nature sometimes. JzG replied to this thread with even more ABFing, and went into his opinions instead of admitting that his problem is with...
Click to read more »will know that this can rise to badgering of opposes particularly when ABF comes in to play. In my view, Jono2013, this is where you have gotten off...
Click to read more »where most of the commotion seems to occur. His posts are usually multiple ABF paragraphs. GoodDay (talk) 13:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Best both.--Wehwalt...
Click to read more »American politics topic ban, Oppose broader ban. There's an awful lot of ABF going on assuming that editing issues with APOL will transfer to other countries;...
Click to read more »partially to see who would react badly to it. Looks like Conti wins today's ABF prize. Kelly Martin (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Hooray! Well, actually...
Click to read more »that at the core of it this is a content dispute that degenerated into WP:ABF because of a lack of discussion and compromise, precisely because you decided...
Click to read more »position that looked a lot like ABF, and since I know you to be a reasonable person someone who generally doesn't ABF (on second reading, my original...
Click to read more »LOT of people seem to be aware of the situation now - and I'm not going to ABF in that he's "acting". I admit, if NYB thinks something is amiss ... (nuff...
Click to read more »WP:FOUR; we are rather trying to make it clear that personal attacks, constant ABF and abuse will not be tolerated! PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 22:27...
Click to read more »Hatting ABF digression.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC) The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. I would...
Click to read more »and Mjroots. BilCat's vote in that latest Afd was this gem of a PERTHEM/ABF combo. I take great offence to you even suggesting that I am in any way similar...
Click to read more »have a problem with AGF and some users, then you should either A) read WP:ABF and get some fresh WP:TROUT from your favourite provider or B) add an "I"...
Click to read more »on one side. Here is my response, which was met by a remarkable level of ABF on the article's talk page, and on my own talk page. Here's my take on it:...
Click to read more »--Floquenbeam (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC) I didn't bring it to ANI to WP:ABF, but out of a concern that the block should not have been made, and that...
Click to read more »QuackG, now who is assuming bad faith, after running here to complain about ABF? There's a great new essay WP:SAUCE.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 23:42, 8 October...
Click to read more »good for his RL thoughts, then he must remain gone. And I know that's WP:ABF, but, well... ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC) Nearly everyone who...
Click to read more »04:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC). Deletefails WP:BIO and nearly fulfills CSD#A7 abf /talk to me/ 10:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »MedCab case myself, Simon. Your accusations of MastCell are the worst kind of ABF - you are clearly not attempting to work to resolve this amicably. I strongly...
Click to read more »SchroCat. I have never accused you and the others of BF. And like your other ABFs, they usually have almost nothing to do with the context of the discussion...
Click to read more »(UTC) And why exactly can't an IP register a complaint about Beta? Are we ABF here?MickMacNee (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC) Because it lends suspicions...
Click to read more »apology on the user's talk page, where it won't be noticed. I am, of course WP:ABF in this. But users of automated tools in general (I don't speak as to this...
Click to read more »pearl-clutching at knowing how to wikilink things is really over the top WP:ABF. ansh.666 17:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Since this looks like it may be...
Click to read more »Ariconte (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC) @Ariconte: Seriously? WP:ABF is only a joke. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions)...
Click to read more »(note block log). This isn't quite boomerang worthy (mostly just unfortunate ABF, as we've seen in the past), but I think it has the potential to be if the...
Click to read more »with usage from a US military IP address. I believe this is the reference ABF from an admin, that's great. I'm unable to find the SPI/CU case establishing...
Click to read more »refused to accept the request. Issues associated with the edit war include WP:ABF, WP:OWN, possible WP:3RR breaches, and accusations of WP:SOCK without raising...
Click to read more »Francis_E_Williams (talk · contribs) of this discussion. This does seem to be a WP:ABF and WP:OWN issue. FEW, creation of an article on Wikipedia does not give...
Click to read more »disqualifying others opinions. This is useless and damaging and 100% WP:ABF. Please strike it. Despite not caring one bit about Mr. S., I will check...
Click to read more »way is a RfC or 3rd opinion. Sneaky comments and smug assumptions are WP:ABF. Awickert (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Die4Dixie's question was a politely...
Click to read more »11:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Support after I got a short view over his work. abf /talk to me/ 13:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Support reliable user. SexySeaShark...
Click to read more »September 2015 (UTC) This editor should be banned from these boards. Massive ABF battleground mentality when things don't go his way. Currently under a topic...
Click to read more »shitty it is? Or where you can express any amount of rudeness, contempt and ABF to anybody as long as they're not an admin? Because I notice there's a bit...
Click to read more »disengage from each other. The previous ANI thread bordered on significant WP:ABF. Just don't interact with each other and your Wikipedia experience will be...
Click to read more »anything to do with Ecoleetage either so your claim is a rather poor show of ABF, IMO. I'm really rather astounded that anyone could look at NYScholar's posts...
Click to read more »behavior to get her way, in a clear case of WP:BLUDGEON, WP:forum shopping, WP:ABF, and WP:POINT Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC) While I do see...
Click to read more »Special:Contribs/71.211.129.129? I've already warned them about the personal attacks and ABF at Talk:Male privilege, and now they've taken to attacking me on my talk...
Click to read more »Delete incorectly named, therefore duplicate and uploader-requested deletion. abf /talk to me/ 16:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Tagged for speedy deletion as...
Click to read more »with the same copyright problems. I've given DragonChin a pretty seriously ABF warning on their Talk page, but I'm wondering if we need to do something...
Click to read more »Please, all of these conspiracy theories are getting dull. Please, drop the ABF and move on. GARDEN 20:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC) If you looked in to...
Click to read more »encountered an editor with such a toxic combination of low comprehension, ABF, hostility, and vicious pinning of a deeply defamatory label on me. CreecregofLife...
Click to read more »should have this discussion again at a later point: We must not allow WP:ABF to become a policy. A ban of Treasury Tag is probably overdue, but here TT...
Click to read more »Outright dis-allowing IP's to post, just because they're IP's is straight up ABF (again, with the exception previously mentioned being the exceptions!) KoshVorlon...
Click to read more »October 2013 (UTC) What happened to WP:AGF Moe? This whole thing is a big ABF witch hunt imo.--v/r - TP 16:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Good faith is acting...
Click to read more »lot of cases. Content-wise. But he would still need to drop the sarcasm, ABF, canvassing... and anyone who doesn't recognize that he has been doing these...
Click to read more »20:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Support excellent user as far as I can see! abf /talk to me/ 20:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Support without any reservations...
Click to read more »care whether they are supposed to be I or PA here). Please stop with the ABF and the hugely misleading statements about sockpuppetry. Fram (talk) 12:51...
Click to read more »being misrepresented. Try to make up your mind why are repeatedly alleging ABF, and when you change your mind don't accuse others of misprepresenting you...
Click to read more »of someone against you harbour an obvious grudge, with a side-order of WP:ABF and a garnish of vitriol. Guy (Help!) 08:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Your blind...
Click to read more »You Know 36 hours from when I created it. Do you need more? including this ABF aspersion: I believe that an Administrator should use this app https://sdzerobot...
Click to read more »and disruptive Talk page participation, such as abusive COI accusations, ABF, personal attacks, etc. As mentioned above, I would volunteer for an IBAN...
Click to read more »anyone who merely takes Keegscee's side in this is a sock of Keegscee; WP:ABF can actually work against the movement here, though your input here is greatly...
Click to read more »admin observation)This section should be closed. It is a prime example of ABF. The very act of editing now seems to be a problem to this editor, and only...
Click to read more »of editor. Blackmane (talk) 21:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC) This is a huge ABF on IP users. Yes, some are problematic, heck I do anti-vandalism runs so...
Click to read more »valid point, but it's also not the kind of smoking gun that requires us to ABF him three years later. Hans Adler 11:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC) Ok, it would be...
Click to read more »articles. It's disturbing that if they do so they should be hammered with WP:ABF. Mind you, a pause after the previous nomination is usually diplomatic at...
Click to read more »someone who knows them both well? This insidious drip-drip-drip of low-level ABF directed at admins is simply terrible. It's demoralisng, degrading, and is...
Click to read more »But I don't see reason to assume so. It could be, but AGF is preferred to ABF. If it turns out to be a bad assumption we can deal with it easily enough...
Click to read more »17 July 2010 (UTC) It was on Commons, deleted because 13:15, 20 June 2010 ABF (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Matt Sanchez 3 by David Shankbone.jpg" ...
Click to read more »seem to make mistakes in formatting g and I don't wand to be to quick to ABF on anything that could be attributed to error. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:45...
Click to read more »this (an implicit swipe at Khazar2) without a single apology, then further ABF everywhere Tony mentions Khazar2? No thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:07...
Click to read more »prevent himself from using the account again. Yellowbeard is a master of WP:ABF. I would put a warning on User talk:ReplyToSM, which from the name, is a...
Click to read more »fails to reflect the diversity of opinion on that site and is a massive ABF as well. Ironically I would have never picked up on the canvassing if I hadn't...
Click to read more »pages {{User AAAHHH}} AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! linked pages {{User ABF}} This user assumes bad faith. linked pages {{User age in decades|1971|1|1}}...
Click to read more »out unsupported accusations, strange metaphors, and a general cloud of WP:ABF. Rd232 talk 14:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC) I don't think its an assumption...
Click to read more »see is a lot of unfocused accusation. In fact it all reads like a massive ABF and wp:pa's.Slatersteven (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC) What have GSoW...
Click to read more »--Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC) This may be a pretty serious ABF, but I did wonder for a second if it might not be automated. TimothyJosephWood...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log). This suggests pro-LaRouche activism and WP:ABF (incidentally, I don't know about anyone else, but I had absolutely no idea...
Click to read more »and I see what they're both getting at but it seems they both default to ABF and arguing over trivalities (like the section header) rather than listening...
Click to read more »(UTC) For me the explanation is that the circumstances misled him into WP:ABF and he never got out of it. Hans Adler 19:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Here's...
Click to read more »confirmation in the OTRS the user is allowed to publish this under a free license. abf /talk to me/ 19:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC) The following discussion is an...
Click to read more »posted since to that discussion. I see no personal attacks. I see a lot of ABF, but I see nothing close to a personal attack. Are there diffs you want to...
Click to read more »the articles. Note : Looks like for you naming policy is something like WP:ABF where there is a sentence describing such behavior Policies are only guidelines...
Click to read more »in Perugia, and that the totality of his actions here are limited to WP:ABF, attacks, insinuation and innuendo against other editors, loud calls for...
Click to read more »battleground straight off his previous 2-week block for similar offenses.WP:ABF on the rest of the editors [73] Another battleground at Talk:Kesha disruptive...
Click to read more »that people cannot keep track of them all, and while it may be a bit of WP:ABF on my part I think Grundle uses the passing of time to his advantage—only...
Click to read more »February 2017 (UTC) RexxS, this is the last time I will respond to your ABF claims here with an umpteenth explanation, if you continue like this regardless...
Click to read more »have an anchovy convenient, you might swipe it across your forehead. The ABF and insults were uncalled for. Please don't do it again. Georgewilliamherbert...
Click to read more »talk page today, that is borderline ABF. [22] AlbinoFerret 19:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC) Mystery Wolff continues his ABF off topic posts, this one on a specific...
Click to read more »TonyBallioni (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC) You're expressing a lot of ABF in that response and I hope you rewrite it. More helpful than sharing your...
Click to read more »deal and should be discounted, the issue is whether his rather blatant WP:ABF on Pookzta's page is demanding of a sanction given his recent history. Arthur...
Click to read more »RFBAs filed by sock puppets. It's a waste of user time. I'd rather just ABF and deal with the matter up front, then not waste my time on the AfD or RFBA...
Click to read more »Doc? carrots 05:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC) Thinking someone made a typo is ABF??? Anyway, Lupin III has never been a redirect to Lupine as far as I can...
Click to read more »him, it would be rejected, as he hasn't got any grounds at all apart from ABF. Anyway, I'm beginning not to care at all, it seems this whole area is screwed...
Click to read more »it should have been. Second, I did not WP:AGF, quite the opposite, I WP:ABF. I also violated WP:CANVASS, and also WP:BITE. It was overall, a very depressing...
Click to read more »nowhere (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC) I'm right there with you. ABF just because a user is an IP is not a good thing. But I don't think his comment...
Click to read more »open admissions of socks since it means the situation can be fixed. AGF or ABF, sock or not, denials or affirmations... disruptive edits usually stand out...
Click to read more »disruptive edits and no actual attempts to deceive. Its just one big WP:ABF party with a few legitimate reports occasionally sprinkled in. Mr.Z-man 18:26...
Click to read more »multiple WikiProjects in question). Accusing others of OWNership is incredibly ABF and shows the weakness of your argument/position. GiantSnowman 11:41, 6 May...
Click to read more »wikibreak came right before a block as well.) I realize I'm somewhat WP:ABFing, but I'm bring up the worst-case. There is enough consensus to warrent a...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete. As the article currently exists, I make the BEEFSTEW score 3 (ABF) - even less notable than when it was nominated for VfD. The examinations...
Click to read more »of AfDs started, in any one week? And can we please do it without all the ABF and name-calling?—S Marshall T/C 15:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Although I...
Click to read more »one page, why wait for them to go to another and start something. Kind of ABF on my part, I know, but I have seen no good edits from this range other than...
Click to read more »have a 'pop' and wind me up at the same time. It is typical admin auto-WP:ABF towards someone who's actually edited all over Wikipedia. Drama is effectively...
Click to read more »in which you accused them of massively misrepresenting a source - that's ABF right off the bat. Why wouldn't you just ask them politely to explain a bit...
Click to read more »sanctioned for one strongly worded comment, he failed and was reprimanded for ABF comments and for the trivial nature of bis request. I'm dismayed to see an...
Click to read more »When invited to discuss, her/his reply was exactly the same, with a bit of ABF included: "You're not a project member of AfC, you're not familiar with the...
Click to read more »signature lines from his edits during these retorts. [[16]][[17]] Makes the ABF more clear [[18]] Labels my edits as "vandalism", inserting his diagram again...
Click to read more »--Floquenbeam (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC) I didn't bring it to ANI to WP:ABF, but out of a concern that the block should not have been made, and that...
Click to read more »about inline citations and any possibility of CoI, rather than BITE and ABF? Did the communications "with Jørn Utzon in an attempt to effect a reconciliation...
Click to read more »K31416 or I were getting at, but instead both seem to have chosen to either ABF and/or invoke their power as holders of a certain preestablished consensus...
Click to read more »QuackGuru's behavior is emblematic. QuackGuru's last paragraph above is remarkable ABF. I made an edit[226], discussed it; a small edit war ensued in which I did...
Click to read more »constant BATTLEGROUND approach (like repeatedly gloating "#toldyouso") and ABF behavior. As Levivich pointed out (see also the first diff), an "agreement"...
Click to read more »people who have been desysopped. Taroaldo ✉ 06:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC) That's ABF and a half. A mention here, considering that INeverCry was very much involved...
Click to read more »[56] [57] [58] [59] [60] Unsourced POV on Kateri Tekakwitha: [61] [62] WP:ABF begins: [63] [64] Personal attacks: [65] Future sock puppet [66] Elizium23...
Click to read more »rhetorical. I've never had a problem with Aitias, so I don't have call to WP:ABF. I agree that we need to remember the past, but at the moment, I'd rather...
Click to read more »13:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC) You are intentionally trying to accuse me of WP:ABF, my dear friend... Why? I did start the discussion on an article's Talk page...
Click to read more »(UTC) (Non-administrator comment) Well, if you wan't to go down the WP: ABF road, then you can go right ahead. They are you admin rights after all, don't...
Click to read more »they would have written something difft. Your view seems that be that is ABF to regard a close rationale as describing an inadequate review of a discussion...
Click to read more »Streisand may agree. Begoon talk 03:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC) If I wanted to WP:ABF here, I could... no, never mind. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:24, 2 March 2012...
Click to read more »only that they can be reverted. I've always taken that to mean it is ok to ABF towards the individual edits and remove them if you think they may be pursuing...
Click to read more »part of some conspiracy to bully away political opportunities is beyond WP:ABF. Smith Jones (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC) (ec) I agree 100% with Smith...
Click to read more »bias" kept rolling in. GC does genuinely seem to be trying to moderate their ABF-ing, but minutes before saying "Yes I fully admit my behavior was inappropriate...
Click to read more »favors, and you've toed if not crossed the line several times as far as ABF and casting aspersions are concerned. I recommend you let other people have...
Click to read more »Malke 2010 (talk) 06:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC) That's a pretty blatant bit of ABF. The move was uncontroversial. Graham summed it up when he said The fact...
Click to read more »for behavorial analysis, I think it might be jumping the gun to make that ABF on behalf of the 4 hour old (at the time of blocking) account. Hasteur (talk)...
Click to read more »a good bit of minor incivility by all parties, especially ABF by Doc James as well as ABF and borderline NPA violations by Edith Sirius Lee (whose case...
Click to read more »yourself don't know what the issues are? BTW, I implored Salvio to explain ABF issues on my unblock request, here, he didn't say anything as of now. I am...
Click to read more »it go and deal with being called a pointy troll which was very much an WP:ABF comment on the other editors part or if I am justified in believing that...
Click to read more »He asked a question. That's not a "wrong pretext" no matter how much you ABF. He got a short clear answer, too, which is more than I'm getting. KillerChihuahua...
Click to read more »for S***** fixation and other defamatory material. ... endless amount of ABF, incivilities, accusationmongering, argumentativeness" - [9] Unfounded accusations...
Click to read more »So unless this is a trolling editor, education is perhaps better than WP:ABF. I don't see it yet. Hengist Pod (talk) 00:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC) The advice...
Click to read more »forever and ever? Oh, wait. Sorry, there wasn't one. Hmmm, might that be some ABF on your part there? Noooo... Ravensfire (talk) 22:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »see the personal attacks. The SPI investigation should be looked at. It is ABF from beginning to end. AlbinoFerret 00:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Comment,...
Click to read more »tools - all without evidence. Msnicki's approach was confrontational and ABF from the outset. Things went down hill from there. (Just to be clear, I'm...
Click to read more »Pudeo could have done so accidentally - which still leaves his strident ABF of Cailil hanging in the air, but eh. KillerChihuahua 13:36, 18 July 2013...
Click to read more »defense. Rhoark (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC) Wow, and I get accused of ABF!! It's not unusual in the RW for one side or the other to benefit more from...
Click to read more »in turn give. Your "participants out for vengeance" bit is pure distilled ABF. I won't say you're out of touch, but you are definitely not without prejudice...
Click to read more »ANI in incredibly detailed dignified tones - well, I could go on - trigger ABF for me.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Detail and dignity induce...
Click to read more »we still have hope. Blocks are preventative, and between your WP:CIR, WP:ABF, uncivil actions, and downright ridiculous off-wiki forum post, you're lucky...
Click to read more »immediately banned because of obvious WP:COI, WP:POV, WP:IDONTLIKEIT, WP:ABF, and WP:CANVASS and also for being incivil and making personal attacks. VolunteerMarek...
Click to read more »Pretended AGF is a form of dissembling and may well cause more problems than ABF because it's impossible to respond to an accusation that was never made explicit...
Click to read more »is unhelpful. Reyk YO! 04:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC) There's an awful lot of ABF in the comments here, and some ridiculously over-the-top calls for blood...
Click to read more »could have asked Berean Hunter what he meant before opting for the most ABF interpretation possible. Lepricavark (talk) 00:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »vote be from someone who will condemn me for coming to DRv with nothign but ABF, and thus won't even bother to read it, or if they do, will ignore it and...
Click to read more »of anti-semitism on the part of the filer. Such instant and absolute WP:ABF demonstrates exactly what we don't want around here. Edits such as this seem...
Click to read more »the time being, perhaps both parties are at least somewhat guilty in the ABF department. Mr rnddude (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC) An official ANI-style...
Click to read more »of annoyance at AO's behavior here is, as I said above, a massive bit of ABF. These are two entirely separate issues, and, while a donut may well be an...
Click to read more »Seconddly, all I see is circumstantial possibilities that you have jumped to ABF and are casting WP:ASPERSIONS. I want a diff where they admitted emailing...
Click to read more »