Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcuts WP:5WP:5 WP:5PWP:5P WP:PILLARSWP:PILLARS The fundamental principles of Wikipedia may be summarized in five "pillars": Wikipedia combines many...
Click to read more ».wp-5p { margin: 0.6em 0 auto; } .wp-5p > div { display: flex; align-items: center; } .wp-5p-intro p { flex-grow: 1; } .wp-5p-intro div { order:...
Click to read more »to ArtAndFeminism 2018/Kickstarter. Date: March 4th, (Sunday) Time: 11A - 5P Location: 58 Kent Street, Brooklyn Announcement: link RSVP: Eventbrite Dashboard...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 5P Global Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »NY 12508 (Community Room) RSVP: link Date: March 3rd (Sunday) Time: 11A - 5P Location: 58 Kent Street, Brooklyn RSVP: link Date: March 3rd (Sunday) Time:...
Click to read more »The Wikipedia training and Edit-a-thon will take place from 1p-5p on Saturday, March 7th at "100state" 30 W Mifflin St, 6th floor. The ArtWrite Collective...
Click to read more »The Wikipedia training and Edit-a-thon will take place from 2p-5p on Saturday, March 11 in the Bubbler at the Madison Central Library, 201 W Mifflin St...
Click to read more »the page name. Some common shortcuts are: WP:HELP, WP:WELCOME, WP:IMAGE, WP:5P, WP:HOPE, and of course, WP:TIP. A semi-complete list of shortcuts is available...
Click to read more »the page name. Some common shortcuts are: WP:HELP, WP:WELCOME, WP:IMAGE, WP:5P, and of course, WP:TIP. A semi-complete list of shortcuts is available at...
Click to read more »the page name. Some common shortcuts are: WP:HELP, WP:WELCOME, WP:IMAGE, WP:5P, WP:HOPE, and of course, WP:TIP. A semi-complete list of shortcuts is available...
Click to read more »the page name. Some common shortcuts are: WP:HELP, WP:WELCOME, WP:IMAGE, WP:5P, and of course, WP:TIP. A semi-complete list of shortcuts is available at...
Click to read more »Politics of Piracy decal at UC Berkeley. Convening in 136 Barrows on Tuesdays 5p-6:30p. This decal deals with issues of digital piracy and piracy of intellectual...
Click to read more »dates/times are here** Use SLACK For communication Monday 01/07: UCF COM 210C 9a-5p 9A-10A: Overview of the course 10A-11A: Presentation by David Lebowitz on...
Click to read more »dates/times are here** Use SLACK For communication Monday 01/08: UCF COM 210C 9a-5p 9A-10A: Overview of the course 10A-11A: Presentation by Shalu Gillum information...
Click to read more »dates/times are here** Use SLACK For communication Monday 10/22: UCF COM 210C 9a-5p 9A-10A: Overview of the course 10A-11A: Presentation by David Lebowitz on...
Click to read more »the page name. Some common shortcuts are: WP:HELP, WP:WELCOME, WP:IMAGE, WP:5P, and of course, WP:TIP. A semi-complete list of shortcuts is available at...
Click to read more »it:Berenguer de Palou II 6 p: 5p new article + 1 kb it:Ferrer Bassa 2 p: 2 kb it:Ramon Muntaner 1 p: 1 kb Article 1 fi:Ferrer Bassa 7 p: 5p new article + 2 kb fi:Bernat...
Click to read more »dates/times are here** Use SLACK For communication Monday 01/08: UCF COM 210C 9a-5p 9A-10A: Overview of the course 10A-11A: Presentation by Shalu Gillum information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia Asia Month Edit-a-thon on Exhibition Histories - Sat, Nov 21st, 12P - 5P Invited Guests: @depthsofwikipedia @wikipediapictures Share + Discuss new...
Click to read more »Politics of Piracy decal at UC Berkeley. Convening in 136 Barrows on Tuesdays 5p-6:30p. This decal deals with issues of digital piracy and piracy of intellectual...
Click to read more »lazy like that here. 148.197.121.205 (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC) The old 5p and 10p coins might be accepted in a shop (although I doubt it), but don't...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and JohnCD; violates WP:5P. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. — HelloAnnyong...
Click to read more »Five Pillars varies wildly from hour to hour. A new editor, accessing WP:5P for the first time might get a totally wrong idea of what the Five Pillars...
Click to read more »March 12 Rarity of coincidence of cycles Finding the multiplier n for 2q·5p·n=10^r Efficient algorithm for the knapsack problem with large capacity...
Click to read more »dates/times are here** Use SLACK For communication Monday 03/05: UCF COM 210C 9a-5p 9A-10A: Overview of the course 10A-11A: Presentation by Shalu Gillum information...
Click to read more »WikiProjects, committees, groups, major user-groups Policy clusters : WP:5P, &c. General links about wikis Wiki, Ward Cunningham, MeatballWiki Twiki,...
Click to read more »February 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep Frivolous nomination or user needs to read WP:5P. Dmcq (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Keep Indisputably notable. Cullen328...
Click to read more »guiding Wikipedia engagement The main, central link: The Five Pillars: WP:5P Formal peer review processes: Featured Articles: WP:FA Criteria for a FA:...
Click to read more »come for all or part of this event! Date:Wednesday, March 28th Time:12P - 5P Location:Tanenbaum Room (300i), Rosenthal Library, Queens College RSVP: via...
Click to read more »WP:USRD/P has illustrated this notability multiple times. In addition, per WP:5P, Wikipedia is a gazetteer, which would include geographical features such...
Click to read more »the term "gazetteer" into WP:5P simply because "I think [this] reflects the reality of WP today". Whether or not WP:5P really is all that pivotal is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Simplify the equation to 41s1 − 36s2 − 5p = 0. The inequality s1>p implies that 0 = 41s1 − 36s2 − 5p > 41s1 − 36s2 − 5s1 = 36s1 − 36s2. The inequality...
Click to read more »contrived; for instance "v" which relies on a Scots word and a pronunciation of 5d/5p which is unknown outside the US. You would do better to apply some of the...
Click to read more »find any RS mentioning this song. DRosenbach, WP:IAR does not override WP:5P - Wikipedia is not about The TruthTM, its about verifiability. Anything not...
Click to read more »and "Penny" - a list of circulating coins would be something like 1p, 2p, 5p, 10p, 20p, 50p, £1 and £2. - fchd 20:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »HELP) 14:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Comment why not just redirect it to WP:5P? -- Ned Scott 01:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete In a terrible state, not...
Click to read more »dates/times are here** Use SLACK For communication Monday 10/21: UCF COM 210E 1030a-5p 1030A-1130A: Overview of the course 1130A-1230P: Presentation by David Lebowitz...
Click to read more »same NPOV issues which this article does at present. On the basis of the WP:5P I think the titles of these articles are inherently POV in nature, and my...
Click to read more »a requirement. The real question is: "is it encyclopedic?" Based upon WP:5P and WP:NOT, I believe that this article is encyclopedic. Just because this...
Click to read more »circumstances /Boldness ... Summaries that have already been made using similar methods: WP:SR WP:TRI WP:5P WP:AN Wikipedia:Arbitration policy/Precedents ......
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Keep Per long-standing consensus, Wikipedia is a gazetteer per WP:5P, so verified populated places are considered notable. The dead link has been...
Click to read more »page is not a directory but meets criteria for inclusion per WP:ALMANAC at 5P. — CactusWriter (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep - consensus is that WP:5P applies as the subject is a verifiable settlement. (non-admin closure) Gongshow Talk...
Click to read more »policies, guidelines and essays. If you are new to Wikipedia, please read WP:5P, WP:ABOUT, WP:NOT, and WP:FAQ. Also see the general disclaimer. Joining Wikipedia...
Click to read more »October 2019 (UTC) Keep As Acroterion said, Wikipedia is a gazetteer per WP:5P. The dead link has been archived, and link maintenance is not cause for deletion...
Click to read more »reflect the product and not be considered advertising? See WP:SOFTWARE, WP:5P, WP:MOS. Look at some other articles for comparable products. And above all...
Click to read more »ELEKHHT 14:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC) SNOW Keep per WP:ROADOUTCOMES and per WP:5P. The latter states that "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It incorporates elements...
Click to read more »12 March 2008 (UTC) Keep Notoriety, excellent work and in line with: WP:5P.Golgofrinchian (talk) 22:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Keep The Library of Congress...
Click to read more »helpful and informative. Dmcq distinguished "general principles" (such as WP:5P) from policies ("fairly specific but still based on principles") and guidelines...
Click to read more »out that WP:NOTSTATSBOOK wouldn't apply to a page like this because per WP:5P Wikipedia contains elements of an Almanac and lists of records holders is...
Click to read more »eleven pages currently linked there at FIVE . Shortcuts WP:FIVEWP:FIVE WP:5PWP:5P WP:FIVEPILLARSWP:FIVEPILLARS Wikipedia:Five pillars For instance, some text...
Click to read more »Comment: I strongly believe in Wikipedia's goal of being a gazetteer per WP:5P, and so I agree with the rather loose requirements laid out by WP:GEOLAND...
Click to read more »or a guideline. The real question is: "is it encyclopedic?" Based upon WP:5P and WP:NOT, this article may very well be. Without any other reason, I cannot...
Click to read more »the spring's existence. Whereas most articles on streams are notable per WP:5P this particular body of water does not meet WP:RS and is not listed by any...
Click to read more »for this is that the term "gazetteer" (which was added to 5P in a BOLD edit) being recited at 5P leads to people trying to wave it around at AFD as an argument...
Click to read more »24 November 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete as it violates every element of WP:5P and WP:BLP. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 00:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »WP:USRD/P has illustrated this notability multiple times. In addition, per WP:5P, Wikipedia is a gazetteer, which would include geographical features such...
Click to read more »is a place for trivia or indiscriminate lists of things, per WP:NOT and WP:5P. Agent 86 04:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Delete We need Wikilistmania! ~ trialsanderrors...
Click to read more »Merge and Redirect to the founder Nandamuri Harikrishna. In line with WP:5P where WP works as gazetteer, i would prefer to have mention and information...
Click to read more »between these two, and actually fluorine 2s has a lower energy than the core 5p orbitals in the lanthanides. So, how significant is the contribution of fluorine's...
Click to read more »(WP:3RR). All policies and guidelines are written with original intent (WP:5P), which are designed to supplement commonsense rather than replacing it (WP:IAR)...
Click to read more »the lack of caoverage about Parker this article should be deleted. Per WP:5P. "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, .....
Click to read more »14:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC) Merge to List of islands of Finland. Per WP:5P, Wikipedia also functions as a gazetteer. North America1000 07:34, 25 February...
Click to read more »how I tried, the machine just wouldn't take the 5p coin. So it had to have come from a dime roll. This 5p coin's story will never be known, which is a shame...
Click to read more »records of past changes. "Contentious" has no meaning in Wikipedia. See WP:5P. Bearian (talk) 20:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC) Well I used the wrong word then...
Click to read more »17:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Keep as a geographic feature per WP:NGEO and WP:5P - Wikipedia is a gazzeteer as well as an encyclopedia. Being privately owned...
Click to read more »29 July 2021 (UTC) Keep - Geographical location listed in the GNIS. Per WP:5P, Wikipedia is a gazetteer and geographical places are notable. Dough4872 22:12...
Click to read more »Wikipedia-wide project guidelines apply, including: WP:V WP:RS WP:NPOV WP:COI WP:5P Nancy Cooke de Herrera - needs photo Nancy Lonsdorf - needs photo Maharishi...
Click to read more »focusing on the class of site (comparison sites), not the site itself, which as @5P: is cobbled together to form an [[WP:NOTADVERTISING|advertisement}}Chrislk02...
Click to read more »Wikipedia includes features of a gazetteer, according to our core policies WP:5P. We should not be deleting articles on any inhabited or formerly inhabited...
Click to read more »until 1980. I recall shilling and two shilling coins (identical in size to 5p and 10p coins) also being used well after Decimalisation. Alansplodge (talk)...
Click to read more »Itsmejudith. Outback the koala (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC) Keep Per WP:5P we are not here for articles that promote any nonsense, so the noticeboard...
Click to read more »then somehow an editor who has been around since 2004 is ignorant of WP:5P, which states that Wikipedia "incorporates elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »the page name. Some common shortcuts are: WP:HELP, WP:WELCOME, WP:IMAGE, WP:5P, and of course, WP:TIP. A semi-complete list of shortcuts is available at...
Click to read more »the 5P talk page? I did link from there back to here. As I wrote yesterday, this discussion has swayed me in the direction of the redirect -- 5P talk...
Click to read more »Coccyx Bloccyx 19:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per above, violates WP:5P and WP:POV especially. Bearian'sBooties 04:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »above WP:GEOLAND which is only a guideline (and also incidentally above WP:5P, which is essay-level), specifically states that Wikipedia is not a directory...
Click to read more »an important encylopedic topic and under the gazzeeteer mandate of the WP:5P. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Note to closing...
Click to read more »thing. I don't even think that it's notable if it's a state-level route. WP:5P was mentioned as a reason not deleting the article, but there is Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »also 3D (WP:3D) – No 3D illustrations 3RR (WP:3RR) – Three-revert rule 5P (WP:5P) – Five pillars of Wikipedia. If there is a number after the P, e.g. 5P1...
Click to read more »p1311-1311, 1/3p Publishers Weekly; 12/19/2005, Vol. 252 Issue 50, p57-57, 1/5p Library Journal; 1/1/2006, Vol. 131 Issue 1, p132-132, 1/6p Booklist; 2/15/2006...
Click to read more »Do you have any intention of contributing to the project? Have you read WP:5P? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC) No, not you SmokeyJoe. I think...
Click to read more »(UTC) Not guidelines. Two of the oldest and most fundamental policies. :) WP:5P: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia incorporating elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »much of an encyclopedia in mid-2004. WP:V was weak and both WP:RS and WP:5P did not even exist. The wiki became a place where people dumped unreferenced...
Click to read more »or a guideline. The real question is: "is it encyclopedic?" Based upon WP:5P and WP:NOT, this article may very well be. Without any other reason, I cannot...
Click to read more »given equations. Given 7p - 12d = 15 (1) -5p + d = 10 (2) From (2) d = 10 + 5p (3) (3) in (1) 7p - 12 ( 10 + 5p ) =15 -53p = 15 + 120 p = -135/53 = -2.54717...
Click to read more »(UTC) Period? No, you have a very odd idea. For Wikipedia's core, see WP:5P for starts. A more mainstream opinion is that the community of Wikipedia editors...
Click to read more »be P(n)=1-5P(n-1)/6-4P(n-2)/6-3P(n-3)/6-2P(n-4)/6-P(n-5)/6. If you assume there is a limit P then you can find P as the solution to P=1-5P/6-4P/6-3P/6-2P/6-P/6...
Click to read more »referring to the edit, then the opposite is the case. High pass sharpening, 5p with 75% opacity. I can crank it up more if you want *wide grin*. Papa Lima...
Click to read more »4O 5O 6O 7O 8O 9O 0-O 1-O 2-O 3-O 4-O 5-O 6-O 7-O 8-O 9-O 0P 1P 2P 3P 4P 5P 6P 7P 8P 9P 0-P 1-P 2-P 3-P 4-P 5-P 6-P 7-P 8-P 9-P 0Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 5Q 6Q 7Q...
Click to read more »posted the citation on 28 December 2020 @ 17:45 UTC (in that thread). "WP:5P sidetrack (part II) on Iridescent's Talk page. User talk:Markworthen/sandbox/Feminist...
Click to read more »March 2012 (UTC) Not really relevant, but in my 1960s childhood, 6d (= 2.5p) would buy: a portion of chips in proper newspaper - now £1.30 - you used...
Click to read more »Without a welcome template, there is no reason to think they person has seen WP:5P. The AFC selection of pushed links are a different set. Newcomers shouldn’t...
Click to read more »be allowed. If he shows he is only here to soapbox, incompatibly with WP:5P, then we'll have to delete to make our position clear. If he is now to be...
Click to read more »(for lack of a better word) of an article on Wikipedia. See WP:NOT and WP:5P. If the Wisconsin BBYO does not fit this criteria, then it should not be included...
Click to read more »content, can be seen as someone elses POV pushing, even when complying with WP:5P.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Comment by others: 2)...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Keep Per WP:5P, Wikipedia is a gazetteer which lists geographical information. I would call...
Click to read more »confused. We need stuff like "Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia" (shorthand for WP:5P and WP:NOT), "Ignore all rules" (shorthand for WP:NOT a bureaucracy), even...
Click to read more »August 2014 (UTC) Support, I say assume good faith, have them read WP:IRS, WP:5P, WP:COI, WP:CIVIL, etc. and then let them edit knowing what is expected of...
Click to read more »WP:BIO. This is one article which, if we are an encyclopaedia and follow WP:5P, then this is the type of encyclopaedic content we should be striving to create...
Click to read more »notable, heck I created an article on a small creek a day or two ago. I cite WP:5P which states, "It incorporates elements of general and specialized encyclopedias...
Click to read more »On the "Learn More About Editing" page there it advises you to visit WP:5P and WP:NOT to check out policies. The following are reasons why the this article...
Click to read more »Testmasterflex's talk page, it appears he or she may have been referring to WP:5P. Cmprince (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »defense is quite detrimental. A vage interpretation of one sentence of WP:5P in ignorance of the following sentences doesn't cut it for me. – sgeureka...
Click to read more »newcomers, so let's first {{welcome}} them, give them a chance to read WP:5P, develop some editing history. Refer to Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. --SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »detailed in government documents [1][2], and we are considered a gazetteer (WP:5P) - however if this got condensed to a table somewhere it wouldn't be a big...
Click to read more »unencyclopaedic content should be deleted, but there are limited exceptions per WP:5P: Wikipedia is more than just an encyclopaedia. We are also a gazetteer, and...
Click to read more »general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." From WP:5P. Simply put, the nominator is incorrect, Wikipedia is an almanac to a degree...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's official policies and guidelines, as one of its first pillars (check WP:5P): "Wikipedia is not the place to insert personal opinions, experiences, or...
Click to read more »is a place for trivia or indiscriminate lists of things, per WP:NOT and WP:5P. Agent 86 17:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Keep plenty here that's more than a list;...
Click to read more »encyclopedic topic and are part of Wikipedia's mandate as a gazzeteer under the WP:5P. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Note to closing...
Click to read more »Back (talk) 19:48, 18 July 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a gazetteer, and WP:5P does not state that it is a gazetteer (any more than it states that it is...
Click to read more »sake of removing promotion, then it's a basic policy and WP:5P. Also, speaking of WP:5P, no one has rebuttal or proposed a solution for the company account...
Click to read more »Announcement of presidential candidacy at national congress, does it fall under 5P? Discussion here Asselineau sitting with UMP members at Paris counsel or member...
Click to read more »i need halp to do this can some one halp me place.thank you 1) -5p-7=-27 2)4n-12=28 3)2s+6=0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.236.132.174 (talk)...
Click to read more »governments, atlases or other significant documents are inherently notable. WP:5P clearly states that, "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that incorporates elements...
Click to read more »multiple sources acrosss multiple continents far surpass any requirements in WP:5P and WP:NOTE. Exactly what is the issue with not keeping this more than adequately...
Click to read more »Kansas. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC) Per WP:5P: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It incorporates elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »is verifiable. Notability only criteria for article improvement". Per WP:5P, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Per WP:NOT#DIR, Wikipedia is not a directory...
Click to read more »are you going to provide what these newspapers "discuss" for us or not? WP:5P says WP "combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias,...
Click to read more »invalidate this WP:MOS guideline, which descends directly from policy (WP:5P, WP:NOT). The guideline is fine, tho a bit watered-down these days from continued...
Click to read more »few days. You assume you have read WP:FIRSTARTICLE already, as well as WP:5P. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »individual highways have articles. This keeps with our mission under WP:5P to be a gazetteer, since gazetteers document roads. Imzadi 1979 → 01:41, 29...
Click to read more »think I will vote in this AfD, but I just wanted to point out that as per WP:5P, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but it is a gazetteer. The distinction is...
Click to read more »people consider one style or the other violates NPOV. Proposal violates WP:5P. Guettarda 02:32, 15 July 2005 (UTC) Oppose - defining what articles fall...
Click to read more »following: * Welcome to Wikipedia [WP:WELCOME] * Wikipedia: Five Pillars [WP:5P] Anatomy of Wikipedia articles, what makes a good article, how to distinguish...
Click to read more »concisely, without me having to repeat it here, why I think you're wrong about WP:5P (which is...also an essay-level guide BTW, albeit a high-impact one, and not...
Click to read more »defense is quite detrimental. A vage interpretation of one sentence of WP:5P in ignorance of the following sentences doesn't cut it for me. – sgeureka...
Click to read more »valid encyclopedic information" is not an actual rationale. For example, WP:5P defines we maintain features of "general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs...
Click to read more »Delete. Fails WP:BK. And if we're to take seriously the description, in WP:5P, that our little Web site is intended to incorporate "elements of general...
Click to read more »get experience improving existing articles, get to know Wikipedia, read WP:5P, before attempting a new topic. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Taichi (talk) 02:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC) Delete as unencyclopedic per WP:5P. // PYRiTEmonark // talk // 20:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »encourage you to read the notability and verifiability guidelines as well as WP:5P. The basic idea is if some kind of minimal standards aren't applied, the whole...
Click to read more »Wash. Terr. 131 (1887). Hays v. Territory of Washington, 2 Wash. Terr. 286, 5P. 927 (1884). Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875). Rosencrantz v. Territory...
Click to read more »guide or directory.... Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 10:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC) Per WP:5P, it may not have to be notable. There are so many articles with only primary...
Click to read more »overturned because someone had previously asked for a prod refund). per WP:5P. "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, .....
Click to read more »subject. Anyone can edit existing Wikipedia articles, but please read WP:5P first. Bellerophon talk to me 17:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC) We understand...
Click to read more »contains information that supports an allegation of notabilty. Based upon WP:5P and WP:NOT, this article may very well be. Without any other reason, I cannot...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) It was reviewed in Wild West, Feb2011, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p73-73, 1/5p. LadyofShalott 13:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Comment The criteria at WP:AUTHOR...
Click to read more »Bee article). It can be extremely abusive (in the sense of violating the WP:5P) to apply wiki-policy in an overly precise way. That's why there are commen...
Click to read more »article (as opposed to a passing interest). If there's disagreement, cite WP:5P. If disagreement continues, perhaps leave a note to the article's Project...
Click to read more »Highways, U.S. Highways, and State Highways are 'automatically notable' per 5P = Gazetteer; county roads and unnumbered routes must pass GNG to have individual...
Click to read more »social media post, self-published and is completely anathema to Wikipedia 5P. scope_creepTalk 19:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »is not cleanup. WP:SOFIXIT is an editing guideline, and it relies on WP:5P and WP:PRESERVE. Unscintillating (talk) 15:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Great...
Click to read more »encyclopedias for which we do not have individual articles for every entry and 5P does not mandate that. Reywas92Talk 21:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC) Your understanding...
Click to read more »is "here are the sources". You're never going to convince anyone with WP:5P or your collection of essay dribble. Presenting the same arguments over and...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Delete. WP:5P - Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. The return of the incessant attempt...
Click to read more »(UTC) You think the people here need to be reminded about rules? How about WP:5P? Wikipedia is not about "rules", Wikipedia is about doing our common goal...
Click to read more »encyclopedia and also fit the gazzeteer mandate of Wikipedia as covered in the WP:5P. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC) this is a recycled...
Click to read more »show me specifically where it says "Wikipedia is a gazetteer" please? The 5P link you gave gives this quote "It combines many features of general and specialized...
Click to read more »was told that for every number of the form 2q·5p (p,q are integers) there exists an integer n so that 2q·5p·n equals 10^r where r is an integer. My question...
Click to read more »time to familarise yourself with the Rules, including, but not limited to WP:5P WP:NOT and WP:V. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC) Dugro (talk ·...
Click to read more »WP:reliable sources with due WP:WEIGHT and supplyWP:citations. Please see WP:5P for what Wikipedia editing is about. Dmcq (talk) 09:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »added to articles.' WP:RS isn't a goal in itself, and isn't one of the WP:5P, except for the purposes just stated. As I point out above, there is little...
Click to read more »07:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC) A source that discusses the context here is WP:5P. Telling me twice that I'm suggesting something after I stated that I was...
Click to read more »notability shown an a almost complete lack of independent reliable sources. wp:5p, "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press": Annette...
Click to read more »The "keep" arguments do not adequately address these serious issues. WP:5P explicitly makes exceptions for WP:NOT content (Le Grand Roi); the problem...
Click to read more »articles like this are sufficiently gazetteer-like to remain on wikipedia per WP:5P. I agree this would not appear in a traditional encyclopedia. The most relevant...
Click to read more »5D 5E 5F 5G 5H 5I 5J 5K 5L 5M 5N 5O 5P 5Q 5R 5S 5T 5U 5V 5W 5X 5Y 5Z 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f 5g 5h 5i 5j 5k 5l 5m 5n 5o 5p 5q 5r 5s 5t 5u 5v 5w 5x 5y 5z Categorized:...
Click to read more »Answer: 5 because 25/5=5. How many integers between 1 and 5p are multiples of p ? Answer: 5 because 5p/p=5. How many integers between 1 and kp are multiples...
Click to read more »reflective of community norms and consensus, but they don't dictate it. WP:5P trumps all else, and last on the list is of course "Wikipedia does not have...
Click to read more »collegiate a cappella groups and redirect. By definition, I mean, read the WP:5P!!! Notability should be implied for all content in wikipedia. Dangerously...
Click to read more »Strong Delete per Yanksox and CrazyRussian. Does not meet the standards of WP:5P and WP:NOT. If a dead mall is inherently encyclopedic for no reason other...
Click to read more »WP:USRD/P has illustrated this notability multiple times. In addition, per WP:5P, Wikipedia is a gazetteer, which would include geographical features such...
Click to read more »on 15 February 1971, the shilling was reduced from 12d. to 5 new pence, or 5p, and the coin itself ceased to be minted. Thus the pound which had always...
Click to read more »completely in the wrong direction, he might be turned around. Be nice. Refer to WP:5P. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC) lol. Yeah, he needs maturing a...
Click to read more »that this narrowly focused CVG-related article is WP:NOT and goes against WP:5P #1. I know many would say I just ironically WP:LAWYERed to support my arguement...
Click to read more »Based on the warnings on their talk page, looks like they're not taking WP:5P to heart, so if they come back to SPI again, I think the AGF account is pretty...
Click to read more »if nl.wikipedia has the same standards. It doesn't have to. Other than WP:5P, every individual Wikipedia develops their own guidance on these matters that...
Click to read more »Artificial features related to infrastructure only require GNG (and as WP:5P notes we are sort of a gazetteer, I use a very lax definition of GNG here)...
Click to read more »is it that just the free bags have these holes, and not the ones you pay 5p for (the 'Bag For Life', as they call it in ASDA)? Is there a regulation on...
Click to read more »edu/~mwherold/ (31, 1, 1, 0) icasualties.org/oef/ (31, 2, 1, 0) www.webcitation.org/5pD9I9kV2 (31, 28, 1, 0) www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,559664,00.html...
Click to read more »press. These topics should clearly pass WP:V and be appropriate under WP:5P as part of our mandate to include topics appropriate to subject-specific encyclopedias...
Click to read more »to be civil and to assume good faith are not optional. They are core (WP:5P) to maintaining a collegial atmosphere in which we can create an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »necessary criterion for notability, supplanted like all guidelines by the WP:5P. Why would the encyclopaedia be improved by the deletion of this article?...
Click to read more »NGO or individually-pushed POV is in following m:Founding principles and WP:5P, whilst democracy without pluralism is indeed the road to hell paved by good...
Click to read more »page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC) File:OO scale and 5P.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs). Non-free toy and non-free coin, see...
Click to read more »contested it because my Internet search and comparison with his peers suggests WP:5P is best served by a less aggressive enforcement of WP:NHOCKEY on the brink...
Click to read more »Wiki-psyc (talk) 13:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:TNT, WP:IAR, and WP:5P#1. This is an irretrievable mess of WP:OR. Of course the topic is notable...
Click to read more »functional as per Wikipedia's purpose as a gazetteer. For example, see WP:5P and the basic information page Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which states...
Click to read more »resource: Sandbox tutorial Assignments (due week 7) As yet another extra credit 5P (!) activity, before Wednesday, October 27, you can nominate your article...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) Reply Please be civil, Wikipedia policies (apart from WP:5P) are meant to represent the consensus of the community if you feel that this...
Click to read more »(WP:N, WP:RS), policies (WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, WP:BLP), and principles (WP:5P's second pillar), and disagreements are frequently settled by assessing source...
Click to read more »not help make your point, it only highlights your failure to comply with WP:5P #4. Fæ (talk) 04:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC) Delete as others have explained...
Click to read more »the code {{helpme}} on their talk page. Shortcuts WP:FIVEWP:FIVE WP:5PWP:5P WP:FIVEPILLARSWP:FIVEPILLARS All rules come from Wikipedia's Five Pillars...
Click to read more »assessment. We cannot compare Wikipedia to "normal" encyclopedias. Per WP:5P, "It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs...
Click to read more »not WP:SIGCOV. Wikipedia imports value from almanacs and gazetteers (WP:5P), and as such there are specific criteria to determine the notability of geographic...
Click to read more »your group is working on); find and add a reliable inline reference to it (5P). The citation you add should have at minimum the following elements: author's...
Click to read more »somehow that the article is too niche for Wikipedia, directly contradicts WP:5P. Somehow that niche audience doesn't need that information to be preserved...
Click to read more »Chromosome 4, trisomy 4q25 qter Chromosome 5, monosomy 5q35 Chromosome 5, trisomy 5p Chromosome 5, trisomy 5pter p13 3 Chromosome 5, trisomy 5q Chromosome 5, uniparental...
Click to read more »Since this falls outside of the scope of Wikipedia (as defined by NOT and WP:5P), the evaluation of the sourcing is a secondary question. TonyBallioni (talk)...
Click to read more »other Wikipedians with trying to declare their friendship as evil violate WP:5P. You are trying to delete a biography page about a person by telling how bad...
Click to read more »include all populated places as part of Wikipedia's function as a gazetteer (WP:5P). This MfD breaks the very first pillar. There is also a strong push toward...
Click to read more »Melsaran (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC) So you object to pages like AFD, RR, 5p, disambig, RFA noting the WP pages which are applicable? FrozenPurpleCube...
Click to read more »that notability is a must. B1atv 19:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Nothing in WP:5P says notability is a must. Our core content policies are WP:NPOV, WP:V, and...
Click to read more »January 2019 (UTC) Ignoring much of the above, this is a solid expansion of WP:5P to be explainable in layman's terms. I'd be agreeable to moving the original...
Click to read more »Jean-Fred (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Is Athena going to explain WP:5P to 5,000 new editors, or is that not the WMF's problem? How will Athena make...
Click to read more »standalone articles, is a valid part of our function as a gazetteer per WP:5P. Cemeteries are a significant part of a landscape and the communities they...
Click to read more »also knew the ways to avoid the home-bound rush by back roads. I use to work 5p-2a M-Th and spend the rest of my free time asleep, stoned, and/or at the nude...
Click to read more »content by and about women in the encyclopaedia. Sunday 29 May 2016, 2p.m. - 5p.m. In conjunction with Herstory's photographic exhibition at InSitu Photo...
Click to read more »treat each other with respect and civility, even when rules are broken, and 5P) we have no set rules, but as a community we establish polices and guidelines...
Click to read more »admins to complete the procedure for these users to ensure maintenance of WP:5P. Thanks Sudharsansn (talk • contribs) 10:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC) http://en...
Click to read more »seconds, all by Lugnuts. FOARP (talk) 08:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Keep all per WP:5P - "Wikipedia combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias...
Click to read more »limits. Thank you-RFD (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC) This is false; per WP:5P, Wikipedia "contains features" of a gazetteer. Gazetteers don't normally have...
Click to read more »and satellite navigation systems. Shares in Regenersis closed up 3p at 71.5p yesterday, their highest level for more than 12 months, and valuing the company...
Click to read more »Control, and Stability. PLoS Biology; Nov 2005, Vol. 3 Issue 11, p1868, 5p, 2 diagrams, citing Control theory#Stability (21 September 2005) Fox, Mark...
Click to read more »some how control that user's comments... In fact of matter my views on the 5P and most other broad ideas regarding how policy should be implemented were...
Click to read more »is WP:5P. On the welcome templates, I agree. The welcome templates are not quite serving. I recommend a simple welcome, a prominent link to WP:5P, and...
Click to read more »symbol when writing in English: smaller British coins include 1p, 2p, and 5p denominations. Currency abbreviations preceding a numeric value are unspaced...
Click to read more »formal policy)." You are entitled to your interpretation of notability and WP:5P, which is shared by some other editors, but it just isn't policy, and there...
Click to read more »e. using WP for testing browser blocking code, completely contrary to WP:5P. A newbie user would be indefinitely blocked for this sort of malicious behaviour...
Click to read more »Sunday, March 10: Hammer Museum (Westwood), Noon–5p. Sunday, March 17: LACMA (Miracle Mile), Noon–5p. Sunday, March 31: California African American Museum...
Click to read more »friendly too and make your Wikipedia experience more enjoyable; check WP:5P and WP:LOP to make sure you're an expert on policies; wait a couple of months...
Click to read more »complaining about being attacked. A more professional conduct could be had here. WP:5P says, "Our encyclopedia combines many features of general and specialized...
Click to read more »the books themselves can be considered primary sources. There is also WP:5P - which states "Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia" as a fundamental principle...
Click to read more »logically.►Chris NelsonHolla! 21:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC) You are welcome. WP:5P DoubleBlue (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Here's some logical thought from...
Click to read more »edu/~mwherold/ (31, 2, 1, 0) icasualties.org/oef/ (31, 7, 1, 0) www.webcitation.org/5pD9I9kV2 (31, 157, 1, 0) www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,559664,00.html...
Click to read more »longer worth the trouble. Put differently, the 1940 farthing was worth about 5p in 2008 terms. By 1960, it was worth barely more than 1p today. It would not...
Click to read more »lower and GNG may not always apply (as possibly in this case) and per WP:5P, no one has to stick to all policies and guidelines. Adam mugliston Talk ...
Click to read more »as a trusted member of the community to enforce policy in support of the 5P - a responsibility I'm ready to take. Specifically, I view the ability to...
Click to read more »direction for improving my Wikipedia skills. I have found that keeping WP:5P in mind rather than derivative, if well known, guidelines has helped when...
Click to read more »5 ( 15 p 2 + 5 p + 1 ) {\displaystyle =\left(1-p\right)^{5}\left(15p^{2}+5p+1\right)} . Now, the next part of the question asks for what values of p {\displaystyle...
Click to read more »stressed some more? GofG: They split up TRI's NPOV rule into 5P's Encyclopedia rule and 5P's NPOV rule kim_: GofG, right GofG: I would say that Encyclopedia...
Click to read more »other editors; here's one example, in which he writes "Cconning people on a 5P talk page to get NPOV changed just to hep you is very serious, so I'd like...
Click to read more »Policy and guidelines derive from the 5P, or in some cases are codified good practice that does not conflict with the 5P. Foundational policy thus trumps all...
Click to read more »Announcement of presidential candidacy at national congress, does it fall under 5P? Discussion here Asselineau sitting with UMP members at Paris counsel or member...
Click to read more »making the article clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, and consistent. 5P Abbreviation for "Five pillars of Wikipedia". Back to contents Contents !$@...
Click to read more »{{User:Melecie/Userboxes/5P|2}} Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view linked pages {{User:Melecie/Userboxes/5P|3}} Wikipedia is free content...
Click to read more »refering to half a crown (a pre-decimalisation coin worth the equivalent of 12.5p now) in slang as half a dollar. I think you got four dollars for the pound...
Click to read more »the dominant trait in that population? p2 + 2pq + q2 p + q = 1 p = 4q q = 1/5p q = .2 p = .8 .22 = .04 1 - .04 = .96 Vs6507 13:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC) It...
Click to read more »(talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC) This Brown did not read WP:5P, broke real events, and were repeated despite warning. They continued to deny...
Click to read more »edits there and on the Talk Page and see that we operate according to WP:5P trying to protect the article against assumed vandalism. If so, a semi-protection...
Click to read more »summaries with trivia aren't. There's the matter of WP:COPYRIGHTS and WP:5P that discourages both. TTN would be fine to be bold on the first redirect...
Click to read more »the whole point of Wikipedia. I suggest you read up on the following: WP:5P, WP:NOT and especially WP:V. WP:COI might apply here too. ♫ Melodia Chaconne...
Click to read more »the solution rather than part of the problem. Ling.Nut (talk) Editor WP:5P, eventualism Alvaro Azevedo Moura Uninvolved in the conflict. Interested in...
Click to read more »most important of Wikipedia's policies and why? A: Picking a winner from WP:5P is difficult but if pressed I would go for WP:NPOV as it is the basis for...
Click to read more »handful of loose seeds. The answer was that you wouldn't have to pay the 5p bag tax. I can work out the fish (needs water which requires a bag) and the...
Click to read more »"{{Information page|5P}}" to 5P, my edit summary indicated that there are 3.7 million links to the page (linkcount). That confirms 5P's status as something...
Click to read more »though I agree with the 5P that we do in fact have gazetteer-like qualities and that should not be removed from the 5P. But is the 5P actually pulling this...
Click to read more »slow-burning conflict over WP:5P principles going on that never quite resolves, cycling between non-specific language (think WP:5P) and specific language (think...
Click to read more »Power~enwiki. 219.77.116.215 (talk) 15:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:5P. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. This is not encyclopedic content. Cheesemaking...
Click to read more »That being said, consensus can change, and so it's not impossible that WP:5P will be renamed at some point. But given that the principle of neutrality...
Click to read more »appropriate. But I'd like us to consider putting it back somewhere, perhaps not at 5P but somewhere! Or is it still there and I'm missing it? I've done a little...
Click to read more »involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »proper ways to change our mission. To say this is against WP:5P shows ignorance of WP:5P. --John (talk) 13:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC) Of course. I agree...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »point of view. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:5P. "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, .....
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »own article, again per WP:SIZE. Imzadi 1979 → 01:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC) WP:5P. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It incorporates elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »be swaying towards meta:Deletionism. The article meets criteria under WP:5P. I hope others agree with you that it squeaks in with all the ever-shifting...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »many of the entries are included because WP:SHAREDNAME rather than any WP:5P reason. Without any control on content the whole list becomes WP:TRIVIA and...
Click to read more »George HillHill-George (talk) 20:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:5P. "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, .....
Click to read more »and WP:POV. Not sure how changing the name changes the violations per WP:5P. Bearian (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC) If this article were to be moved...
Click to read more »16 Jan 2008 (UTC) It truly is. Thanks for your inputs. Unfortunately WP:5P and WP:ENC do not explicitly state that they are policy, even though they...
Click to read more »posted the citation on 28 December 2020 @ 17:45 UTC (in that thread). "WP:5P sidetrack (part II) on Iridescent's Talk page. User talk:Markworthen/sandbox/Feminist...
Click to read more »however, concerns have been raised that this would contravene WP:NOT and WP:5P which is the motivation for raising the topic here. I personally would like...
Click to read more »{{welcome only}} I think might be good. Perhaps a single reading link, to WP:5P? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC) pinging @DRAGON BOOSTER: as...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »+Miss+Mississippi&cd=18&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:5pFTpp_yPP0J:www.tcg.org/publications/at/sept08/delta.cfm+Toni+Seawright...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »highlighted phrase "Wikipedia has a code of conduct" links to in the often-cited WP:5P page? That's what "code of conduct" means for most of us normal mortals. Fut...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »consensus and help us get this talented and passionate editor back onto the WP:5P path. Cheers & Thanks, Kevin/Last1in (talk) 13:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Result:...
Click to read more »vbNewLine & "20p: " & twenties & vbNewLine & "10p: " & tens & vbNewLine & "5p: " & fives & vbNewLine & "2p: " & twos & vbNewLine & "1p: " & ones, "Change")...
Click to read more »Honestly, I don't even know where to start. "Put down the ax and read WP:5P," in slightly gentler terms, hasn't seemed to work. jæs (talk) 22:15, 23 December...
Click to read more »e. using WP for testing browser blocking code, completely contrary to WP:5P.) 06:48, June 29, 2006 Cyde unblocked SPUI (There's no community consensus...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »she's been having (for years) in this area is just not compatible with WP:5P. While I agree also with GWH and HJM that we should wait 24 hours, I have...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »exhorted to use the time of their block to study WP:SOAP, WP:V, WP:AGF and WP:5P inter alia. Tonywalton Talk 00:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Page: Michael Roach (edit...
Click to read more »pattern of harassment of Mbz1 lately. They are not acting according to the WP:5P and certainly do not appear to be doing things that encourage positive collaboration...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) In case you haven't realized already, simply reading WP:5P doesn't help with understanding the nuances inherent in those pillars. It...
Click to read more »don't care what the source says, which suggests they do not understand the WP:5P. Wikipedia articles are based on what reliable sources say, and an editor...
Click to read more »Gtoffoletto (talk) There is consensus based on resolved discussion and WP:5P WP:BALANCE Soapbox? It's not that there's Self-promotion or advertising. There's...
Click to read more »WP:FICT, WP:NOT#INFO, WP:NOT#PLOT, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:WAF, WP:RS and WP:5P. [[Guest9999 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)]] Please avoid WP:JUSTAPOLICY 75...
Click to read more »discussed. "Chief concepts" are simply those, concepts, not strict policy, not WP:5P, guidelines. You've removed cats that have tertiary sources leaving no sourcing...
Click to read more »handle; I protected the article for two days, and tried to teach basic WP:5P to the editors, but I cannot be expected to babysit every Rajasthani jingoist...
Click to read more »Sanatorium, Route nationale 18, University of Mwaro ... find all 5 - wikt:PI5P - 5P, Myogenesis, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, Phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate...
Click to read more »consequences. As far as I am concerned, you are free to edit, but please follow WP:5P as closely as possible, especially when working on contentious articles. This...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »1994 about it), and the article now has a prose lead. In addition, per WP:5P, "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia incorporating elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) Comment - Just a follow up. This article doesn't break WP:5P, which appears to be the biggest criteria for keeping an article. It is verifiable...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »05:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Users who insist on breaking the major rules (WP:5P) are subject to requests for comment, blocking or banning. Bearian (talk)...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) I've since blocked her for 7 hours and told her to read 5P and CIVIL, by-the-by. That place is become an extreme problem and blanking...
Click to read more »On 17 Dec, deciding to "lead by example" (illustrating what we mean by WP:5P), I became arguably "involved", and I admit to losing some of my cool under...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »CitrouillesTally-ho! 18:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC) No, you're missing the point. 5P isn't a "catch-all" policy that says everything is notable - seriously, it's...
Click to read more »source. And, really...pointing new users toward such general links as WP:5P after they specifically ask for help isn't very....helpful. His edits were...
Click to read more »should always trump the social rules. In fact, you have to get to #4 of WP:5P before you get to civility standards--and that section expects all editors...
Click to read more »beliefs with respect to editing that are not completely compatible with WP:5P. I have suggested that they they adjust and align their beliefs to the principles...
Click to read more »shown no respect for the time people put into the page, contrary to the WP:5P, and in no way was the January version un-balanced. Also...in particular look...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »crufts. Again my advice to you is take off some time and read WP:AGF and WP:5P. Hope it helps. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 04:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Delete. This essay is exactly the opposite to the bullet of WP:5P, and I do agree that it falls within the WP:POLEMIC. Not quite sure why the...
Click to read more »there is nothing inherently discriminatory about equal application of WP:5P. Policies like this are relevent to content, not to persons. Nothing has been...
Click to read more »needs links to some of the most basic, obvious policies. A link to the WP:5P would do it. (something along the lines of "If you do want to see what the...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »attention to detail, but perhaps a little time considering the spirit of WP:5P rather than the particular wording of policy details would benefit all concerned...
Click to read more »"karma" never felt right (does this really conform with the spirit of WP:5P?). But I have observed its development, translated a fair bit (it's my native...
Click to read more »FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY [u+1F602] 17:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Contrary to WP:5P; also the problems caused to outreach events have not been adequately addressed...
Click to read more »pages that are about IAR (namely, WP:IAR and WP:IAR?) and the other two (WP:5P, WP:GAME) are to augment commentary made by reliable sources which discuss...
Click to read more »inflammatory rhetoric and personal attacks. Also, you repeatedly quote WP:5P above as some sort of a defense for some reason, but is of course far too...
Click to read more »when it is obviously in a transitional stage. As yet another extra credit 5P (!) activity, you can nominate your article for Wikipedia:Did you know (but...
Click to read more »seriously. 28bytes (talk) 10:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC) WP:AGF isn't a WP:5P, never was, hopefully never will be. You can't demand how people think, that's...
Click to read more »hundreds of other cases that appear here. Editor who cannot comply with WP:5P will be removed, eventually. Johnuniq (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »several an olive branches but you threw them in my face. Why don't you read WP:5P again before accusing me of things. And the admin didn't agree with either...
Click to read more »held to formally make the Five Pillars a Wikipedia policy? It would give the 5P the formal heft that they seem to have gained informally. I see that this...
Click to read more »liability. Its all about the core purpose and values of Wikipedia. This is a WP:5P issue and nothing else. --Jayron32 06:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC) However, like...
Click to read more »when it is obviously in a transitional stage. As yet another extra credit 5P (!) activity, before Wednesday, June 1, you can nominate your article for...
Click to read more »compliance with WP:5P, provision of suitable WP:RS and meeting the standards for inclusion set by the relevant SNG(s). WP:NOT, one of the 5P, begins with WP:NOTPAPER...
Click to read more »there a page that says roughly the same thing, but more in the style of WP:5P? --- tqbf 17:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Add something about BLP, perhaps:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article about it. This is summarized in the first pillar of WP:5P, and WP:POLICY has a nice one-liner "Wikipedia policies and guidelines are...
Click to read more »°co-ords° 05:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Exactly. On one hand we have WP:5P which states that we are to perform the function of a gazetteer, but on the...
Click to read more »philosophy. I don't have a problem with that (as seriously as a !vote citing WP:5P can be taken in an AfD). I have a problem with commenting on others !votes...
Click to read more »non-admins and admins alike, should be just that - writing articles? WP:ENC and WP:5P, after all. Moreschi Deletion! 21:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Unfortunately...
Click to read more »It is wholly unacceptable for editors to be changing / reverting a core WP:5P policy page. As can be seen here WP:Verifiability&curid=3961892&action=history...
Click to read more »weeks, he still will not understand WP:CONSENSUS ... or indeed, any of the WP:5P. His chat with User:Gwen Gale was supposed to help enlighten him - he simply...
Click to read more »respect it. I reserve the universal right to invoke WP:IAR, as derived from WP:5P. In nine years of editing at WP I may have argued for WP:IAR on a handful...
Click to read more »terrestrial animal in the world (if it weren't Adwaita). He made the reverse of the 5p of Saint Helena. What have you done? Khanzir Possibly the world's loneliest...
Click to read more »Either is fine for a clearly erroneous redirect as long as no links to the 5P are being broken. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:41, 21 March 2017...
Click to read more »association, the user has consistently demonstrated willingness to follow 5P, policies and guidelines and when seeing a contradiction, has always asked...
Click to read more »by Mugun.cjb to me Hope @Mugun.cjb: would spend some time to understand WP:5P and continue contributing to the project collaboratively. Vikram Vincent 08:29...
Click to read more »what counts as marketing and advertising must evolve too. WP:NOTSPAM and WP:5P are principles that lay out what we are and are not. We are not a venue for...
Click to read more »support your arguments. If you're not familiar with our policies, read WP:5P. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Here, here. Finally...
Click to read more »WP:ONEEVENT. I still believe this article it meets the policies put forth in WP:5P. The AfD on Joseph Didier should be redirected according to WP:ONEEVENT which...
Click to read more »disagreements are (in the simplest terms) on his continued refusal to conform to the 5P's while dealing with other editors. S/he BITES, refuses to abide by a TRUCE...
Click to read more »October 2013 (UTC) I don't see how WP:5P#2 (NPOV) applies here either. πr2 (t • c) 15:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC) I meant 5P#3 and have corrected it above. Technical...
Click to read more »WP:USRD/P has illustrated this notability multiple times. In addition, per WP:5P, Wikipedia is a gazetteer, which would include geographical features such...
Click to read more »are convinced that they have come to understand and will abide by NOR and 5P. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC) The move request...
Click to read more »policy WP:V). --MASEM (t) 01:56, 7 August 2012 (UTC) "5P is not policy"...now I've seen it all. 5P isn't "policy" because it's a Wikipedia founding principle...
Click to read more »months because someone wants to change the wording of the 5P or the FAQ page or asks "what is the 5P?". Latham Circle was nominated for AfD based on non-notability...
Click to read more »reciprocate in my belief that I am right--although I would appeal more to 5P and reason than the community; my experience is that what the community does...
Click to read more »Wikipedia policies and going against the basic nature of Wikipedia and the WP:5P. I fail to see how reporting disruptive editors is off-base. Breein1007 (talk)...
Click to read more »Czarkoff (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Oppose, but see the problem: As WP:5P says 'all of your contributions can and will be mercilessly edited and redistributed...
Click to read more »too. I'd advise OP Gehrminator to read up on our guidelines for WP:RS, WP:5P, WP:YFA, and then go ahead and start working on a section, perhaps discussing...
Click to read more »User:Hiding at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction): (L)et us recognise that [[WP:5P|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia incorporating elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »a basic concept of Wikipedia. If you want pbasic concepts, please see WP:5P (sorry about the OMGTMDTLAARGH). --Celestianpower háblame 13:55, 7 March 2006...
Click to read more »editors/admins, we have tried to teach User:BruceWHain simple concepts .. like the WP:5P, not to WP:REFACTOR, WP:NPA, and a whole bunch of other things. He continues...
Click to read more »seeming to learn nothing. So be it. If our community is to be governed by WP:5P then civility and collaborative editing must be enforced, and I salute this...
Click to read more »Ideas?--Wehwalt (talk) 23:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC) WP:V is part of the 5P. This seems more like a refusal to work with Wikipedia's principles. Block...
Click to read more »against NPA (No Personal Appliances), RS (Radiation Sources) and the basic 5P (level 5 power setting). (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Unfortunately, you might just be right. If he was willing to follow the WP:5P, he might be useful ... right now, he's clearly a mega-net-negative dangerouspanda...
Click to read more »positively to the encyclopedia. This is just petty, and isn't in line with the WP:5P. Breein1007 (talk) 07:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Given that an admin just confirmed...
Click to read more »place for you. See Wikipedia:Own#User_pages and Wikipedia:Copyrights. See WP:5P #3 and User:Jimbo_Wales/Statement_of_principles#Principles #5. Our licensing...
Click to read more »v t e Sterling coinage Decimal system 1/2p 1p 2p 5p 10p 20p 50p £1 £2 £sd system Quarter farthing (1/16d.) (Ceylon) Third farthing (1/12d.) (Malta)...
Click to read more »of "general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers" (WP:5P). –Juliancolton | Talk 17:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC) The information itself...
Click to read more »2. Stop using the label, or 3. Take it to the proper forum. It is not WP:5P to call other editors names and make allegations of poor conduct over and...
Click to read more »manner, using the least amount of blocks and protection, which is what WP:5P is all about. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 22:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Yeah, I was...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Just a thought for those waving around WP:5P above - if we consistently dropped long blocks on every editor who repeatedly...
Click to read more »encourage you to take some time to read through WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, and WP:5P. Familiarize yourself with our conduct standards, and really give some thought...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »WP:IDHT, WP:TE, WP:CIV, WP:N, WP:MERGE, WP:SPINOUT, WP:NOTPUNISHMENT, WP:5P, WP:POINT) and have a good long think about your editing history and all the...
Click to read more »the site. TCN7JM 00:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Support site ban, because as WP:5P says, one of our fundamental principles is that "Wikipedia is free content...
Click to read more »October 2011 (UTC) Indeed. For an admin to say "fuck civility" (or any of the 5P for that matter) is nothing short of unacceptable. But the response to the...
Click to read more »advice on her talk page. Perhaps when she reviews WP policies, guidelines, 5P, etc. she'll understand what's going on. Let's be careful not to WP:BITE....
Click to read more »here on ANI, and yet still no block? They clearly have no concern for the WP:5P, or others. dangerouspanda 08:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC) My understanding is...
Click to read more ». . User:Incnis Mrsi/Glossary (+waste) (top) [rollback 3 edits] Per WP:5P: Wikipedia does not have firm rules. Rules in Wikipedia are not carved in...
Click to read more »policy documents has he edited? A quick look at the earliest years of the WP:5P policies shows no involvement at all. And yet, here we are, spending our free...
Click to read more »User:Pigsonthewing myself about this. Basically, he has broken advice in WP:5P and WP:Reckless, then acted as if to pre-empt any attempt to reach a consensus...
Click to read more »encyclopedia article. This is in conflict with Wikipedia is an encyclopedia from WP:5P and It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without...
Click to read more »Timeshift (talk) 06:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Most people would have read [{WP:5P|the pillars]] and avoided attacks in the first place. You don't have to agree...
Click to read more »standards according to guidelines (from now on I'm always going to apply WP:5P - thanks Jack for pointing this out - as the two most often-quoted guidelines...
Click to read more »policies of Wikipedia" anywhere in policy, but my interpretation of and WP:5P seems to suggest that what it is is an objective and neutral source of information...
Click to read more »damaged, or broken links. To falsify the work of others is totally anti-5P. I'm glad you at least say you support the Five Pillars, let's see that in...
Click to read more »reverts, then me. Obviously they need similar sanction, and a reminder of WP:5P. I hear you clear and loud, but I have to point out this incident has to be...
Click to read more »and he needs to take several steps back. I've suggested that he goes to WP:5P to try and understand what the site is about. I've tried to explain NPOV and...
Click to read more »belligerent about it. Please stop - consensus rules on Wikipedia, as per WP:5P ES&L 19:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC) ES&L, you probably didn't understand the...
Click to read more »keys in "The five pillars of Wikipedia", you know they are talking about WP:5P. There isn't anything else this could mean. —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 21:11...
Click to read more »it, and all 77,000 editors have no quibbles? Can editors, adhering to WP:5P, continue to block my entry without supplying evidence to support their claims...
Click to read more »certainly something I've observed - there's some Admins who toss 3 of the 5 WP:5P out the window after they've been an admin for a while, deciding that perhaps...
Click to read more »very book. "Respect copyright laws" is actually something you can read at WP:5P. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 02:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Hello. The internal...
Click to read more »requires making an exception.". This must apply to all things here, as the 5P is the authority from which all policy flows. Discretionary sanctions are...
Click to read more »reign in Sceptre's IDIDNTHEARTHAT circular refrains). The above mention of 5P completely misses the point: we are adults, and respect is not handed out...
Click to read more »Once you create the article, everyone has the same right to edit it. See WP:5P, it is part of how Wikipedia works. No one owns an article, even if they create...
Click to read more »problems are those concerning violations of Wikipedia's policies (see WP:5P for a summary—are sources reliable? are topics mentioned due? is there a biographies...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »editor. The list of personal attacks Pudeo cites are patent violations of WP:5P, specifically the core requirement that "Wikipedia's editors should treat...
Click to read more »points. In cases where there have editors involved, we still have to go by our 5p based rules. TheTimesAreAChanging (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs ·...
Click to read more »keep reminding myself that the words "logical reasoning" do not occur at WP:5P.) At the very least involved editors should be excluded from the review for...
Click to read more »admin's think that they no longer need to follow WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, or WP:5P - but that is not true. Why not simply point to where the abusive editing...
Click to read more »anyone and ignored requestes and warnings, they indicate no respect for the WP:5P and should therefore be blocked. 10:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Melroross (talk)...
Click to read more »how much was in it about Densa. Edison 00:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Delete. WP:5P "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia" not a joke.Tstrobaugh 17:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »back against constantly unsourced WP:POVPUSHing with no respect for the WP:5P. Those users are ජපස (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log ·...
Click to read more »belligerent about it. Please stop - consensus rules on Wikipedia, as per WP:5P ES&L 19:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC) ES&L, you probably didn't understand the...
Click to read more »above where Buster thinks we should have a "Deletion squad"? where in WP:5P is that idea represented? And Indy Beetle...tsk tsk. I once heard a lawyer...
Click to read more »Transportation, and Missouri. Hog Farm Talk 05:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Keep. WP:5P establishes that Wikipedia is a gazetteer, and airports are a standard part...
Click to read more »blocks. My comment is that I have been making edits in accordance with WP:5P, using WP:COMMONSENSE, but have found it extremely difficult to edit this...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »reach a compromise. Unfortunately the user appears not to understand the WP:5P despite numerous attempts to Talk and resolve in a collaborative way. Also...
Click to read more »regardless, the issue here is not about content. It's about Nishidani violating 5p. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC) I don't see how those would...
Click to read more »your group is working on); find and add a reliable inline reference to it (5P). The citation you add should have at minimum the following elements: author's...
Click to read more »(or lacking sufficient experience to) teaching about the basics, e.g., WP:5P, WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:RS, WP:VANDALISM, WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:GA to name a few I can...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »more chance of the Second Coming of Jesus than getting a sanction based on a 5P violation. Only in death does duty end (talk) 14:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC) After...
Click to read more »care in the future to adhere to all important policies as outlined at WP:5P, and not make sweeping accusations of misconduct without adequate evidence...
Click to read more »interact productively with other editors, even those who do not respect the 5P, and have been regularly thanked for my work here (via the "thank" button)...
Click to read more »the spirit of the guidelines for populated places, and per point 1 of WP:5P. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Lugnuts, I am basically...
Click to read more »(Talk/Edits) 13:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC) @Ivanvector: Civility, one of the WP:5P, eh. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 13:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »consensus to keep. I hope someone will tell me this is not an example of 5P editing. Lightbreather (talk) 00:41, 13 July 2014 (UTC) Lightbreather, the...
Click to read more »Kevjonesin (talk): Please chill and then spontaneously combust. thank you. (TW)-WP:5P)[93] my inquiry and its response on User:Dicklyon's talkpage:[94] the summary...
Click to read more »expect you to read and understand our conduct rules such as documented at WP:5P, WP:NPA and WP:AGF, among others. Sandstein 08:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »come into the analysis for me. And whatever we feel, WP:C is one of the WP:5P. No, it doesn't (and is not meant to) solve all problems--your POV pusher...
Click to read more »the spirit of the guidelines for populated places, and per point 1 of WP:5P." "I've assumed a lot of good faith from the OP's concerns, despite the two...
Click to read more »of Wikipedia, and are almost inherintly notable. More importantly per WP:5P, "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that incorporates elements of general and specialized...
Click to read more »that makes it foundational"? That doesn't make any sense. I realize that 5P is popular. Personally, I think it's the best essay for new editors to read...
Click to read more »community is only concerned with providing a reliable, quality encyclopedia (WP:5P). I'm sorry your grades hang on this task. The best way to succeed is to write...
Click to read more »encyclopedia articles must be about notable subjects/topics - go back to WP:5P and check. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Well, I guess...
Click to read more »Maria Ventura i Casas 5+1p. fi:Joseph Oller 5+1p. fi:Vicent Ferrer 5p fi:Pau Claris 5p eo:Josep Pla 6 p. (5 new article + 1kb expanding) eo:Jolando de Hungarujo...
Click to read more »relative lack of familiarity of AE. I'm clueful about the topic area and WP:5P, but not so much about dispute resolution boards. I'd hoped that neutral third...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »questions. EdChem (talk) 06:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Civility, being one of the WP:5P, is a safe assumption. Maintaining a collegial approach so that we can create...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support - Solid understanding of policies, appreciation for the WP:5P and an all-around asset to the project. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:16,...
Click to read more »and WP:AFD, and conforms to WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, WP:C, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:5P, WP:NFCC and WP:OMGWTFBBQ. "Wikipedia is not a democracy" policy statement...
Click to read more »can be made that it has slide into contravention of the principles of WP:5P (at "mercilessly edited"), the WP:BOLD guideline, and the policy of WP:EDITING...
Click to read more »History of Education Quarterly, v27 n1 (Spring, 1987): 105 (this last one a 5p. review, unusual for an academic journal) These are just the reviews I saw...
Click to read more »said this is where you'd ask questions but I don't see a question. TheWP:5P is something I'd advise reading before trying to edit the article itself....
Click to read more »to convert from price per kg to price per 100g: the frozen spinach is 11.5p per 100g. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 09:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC) I often have to...
Click to read more »where their only experience of Wikipedia so far is an introduction to WP:5P. I wonder if it would make any difference if the image was real colour or...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »compliance with WP:5P, provision of suitable WP:RS and meeting the standards for inclusion set by the relevant SNG(s). WP:NOT, one of the 5P, begins with WP:NOTPAPER...
Click to read more »14 November 2006 (UTC) Comment - even if it violates the 1st pillar (WP:5P)? the pillars are foundational. i think wikipedia has a strong community already...
Click to read more »well. Burntsauce 17:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Comment - As JulesH said, WP:5P is not a policy, and there is no policy prohibiting trivia. --XDanielx 17:44...
Click to read more »support these pages :o) which is not quite the same thing. Apart from which WP:5P states quite clearly: Wikipedia is an Encyclopaedia which I always take to...
Click to read more »consensus agreements. I haven't seen "common sense" in the essay entitled WP:5P or User:Jimbo Wales/Statement of principles, and it is not listed among the...
Click to read more »entry) not becuase I have a POV on Christians. b) WP is all about the WP:5P, which includes (enduring) Notability and Verifiability from Reliable Sources...
Click to read more »Neutrality (talk · contribs) started 5P as a simple summary for newbies. (I know: lots of people have gone about saying that 5P is foundational and original and...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »[[:|talk]] | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: dwz.cn/5pVNnX (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2017-03-01 02:23:46 (UTC): User 毛雅文 t • c • dc •...
Click to read more »of the guidelines are explanations of the policies, coming down from the 5P. WP:EL can be justified on the basis of WP:NOT, with a bit of a mix of WP:NPOV...
Click to read more »--Cybercobra (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a gazetteer; 5P only says that it "incorporates elements of" a gazetteer. WhatamIdoing (talk)...
Click to read more »- The Bushranger One ping only 06:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC) Keep—per WP:5P, Wikipedia also functions as a gazetteer, and gazetteers cover roads. Deleting...
Click to read more »don't see a way reconcile that conclusion with the spirit of wikipedia and 5P. siafu 00:29, 16 September 2005 (UTC) I think the right implementation would...
Click to read more »AGF/POINT = guidelines because they're not that clear-cut as most policy. 5P is a description, hence essay. WP:ENC is a restatement of policy, and as such...
Click to read more »Reviews I'm going to be a bit blunt here. I think you need to review WP:5P and understand what Wikipedia is about. Your talk page shows that you and...
Click to read more »using the system was seeing shillings still circulating with the value of 5p (and 2 shilling coins with the value of 10p) in the early 80s on my first...
Click to read more »WP:Introduction. Thoughts? - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 16:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC) WP:5P? --King Öomie 16:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC) That mixed with Wikipedia:List...
Click to read more »your group is working on); find and add a reliable inline reference to it (5P). The citation you add should have at minimum the following elements: author's...
Click to read more »when it is obviously in a transitional stage. As yet another extra credit 5P (!) activity, before Monday, May 30, you can nominate your article for Wikipedia:Did...
Click to read more »league in a sport are notable and not trivial. They meet the standard of WP:5P in that they are the type of information that would be found in a sports almanac...
Click to read more »sharedIPedu template. –xenotalk 22:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Oppose, per WP:5P. –xenotalk 22:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC) I am relatively new here, but already...
Click to read more »perspective. Further developed, ATT could serve as useful summary (à la WP:5P) that describes the unified objective that they seek to uphold and how each...
Click to read more »Cheestrings Twisters at £2.98 or a pack of 16 at £3.78 (the latter is cheaper by 5p).....potentially save up to £28 more.... Later this same paragraph goes to...
Click to read more »is just my opinion). Plus it is a nice almanac article which is part of WP:5P. -Marcusmax(speak) 04:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC) CommentThere is an issues...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC) I would anticipate that, as when the 5p, 10p, and 50p coins were reduced in size in the early 1990s, there will be...
Click to read more »Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Template:South Holland Province 5p (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) replaced by template:South...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »articles which are in list-form like this inherently violate WP:IINFO and WP:5P. Sceptre (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) The fact an article can be improved...
Click to read more »always applicable and never 'frivolous or obtuse', including WP:CATDEF WP:5P, and the one you most recently ignored WP:RS. So WOLD mentions Tulsa, is that...
Click to read more »This is just needless bureacracy and obstacle to participation and erodes WP:5P #3 and #5. jni (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Oppose per ShinmaWa and...
Click to read more »not a policy either, but it certainly provides some guidance. Looking at WP:5P and WP:NOT, I have to conclude that this article is not encyclopedic. It is...
Click to read more »to learn all the policies and stuff before contributing -all I read was WP:5P. Puchiko (Talk-email) 20:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you for your replies...
Click to read more »detailed in government documents [30][31], and we are considered a gazetteer (WP:5P) - however if this got condensed to a table somewhere it wouldn't be a big...
Click to read more »(UTC) The five pillars are equally just some editors making up stuff. WP:5P is no more authoritative than WP:TRIFECTA or any of the other several essays...
Click to read more »the term "gazetteer" into WP:5P simply because "I think [this] reflects the reality of WP today". Whether or not WP:5P really is all that pivotal is...
Click to read more »It's the standard terminology in the UK - politicians will talk about a "5p tax cut" when they mean 5%. See, for example, this BBC article. Tevildo (talk)...
Click to read more »appears that the leaving order should be two s, one d, and then (presumably) a 5p electron. Whereas in actuality, a 4f electron appears to leave. The Tm example...
Click to read more »policy. I'm sure I'm not aware of half of our policies by now, WP:ENC, WP:5P, WP:BOLD and WP:DICK are quite enough most of the time. dab (𒁳) 14:39, 8...
Click to read more »redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates...
Click to read more »behavior as opposed to content) will either get very general statements like WP:5P, summaries of content policies such as WP:BRIEF, or large numbers of complex...
Click to read more »our values, which you might indeed find at places such as NOTCENSORED, WP:5P, and many more). From a practical point of view, this is a non-starter, since...
Click to read more »is for, hope that clears it up. Viperix 02:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC) WP:5P also says "Wikipedia is not a dictionary." While some encyclopedias contain...
Click to read more »opening this page: WP:COI; WP:GNG; WP:NOTNEWS; WP:ORG. And also to (re?)read WP:5P, expecially the fisrt and fourth. About your nasty accusations: do you read...
Click to read more »with a neutral point of view. It follows, it does not lead. Please see WP:5P. Dmcq (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC) To delete things on your user page...
Click to read more »(UTC) Going to back to your OP, do you mean a mission statement similar to WP:5P, or do you mean a convenient list of the important stuff such as Template:Wikipedia...
Click to read more »policies for newbies by User:Neutrality about four years after NPOV was created. 5P was a direct expansion of WP:TRIFECTA. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:04, 26 January...
Click to read more »be known for. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Take a look at WP:5P and WP:TRI. .froth. (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Consider WP:PROJPOL – a...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Support. Good answers (and the answer to Malber's WP:5P question seems fine to me, and better than most), a clear rationale per Q1...
Click to read more »(talk, contributions) 20:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC) Delete as contrary to WP:5P. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:17, 23 August...
Click to read more »message. Anyways, these namespaces are hardly seen by new users except WP:5P and the other welcome pages. ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 13:01, 25 March 2010...
Click to read more »guidelines and policies being swept aside here, with possible violations of the WP:5P, we need more formal scrutiny of the situation. MilHist is proving powerless...
Click to read more »earlier already gone and successfully did stuff like WP:SR, WP:TRI and WP:5P, so how hard can it get? Hmm, well pretty hard. "But but but *MY* guidelines...
Click to read more »that should be applauded, and which is well within our ambitions (see WP:5P. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Keep. I notice 'one of the...
Click to read more », which we do tolerate user categories for), specifically in favor of WP:5P / WP:EDITING / WP:CONLEVEL and against misinterpretation of wikiprojects as...
Click to read more »noted that the later is considered a fundamental principle as supported by WP:5P (which is not policy either). It is not civil behaviour to criticise other...
Click to read more »reduce any backlogs and facilitate navigation and communication. Focus on WP:5P, and demonstrate how the outlines contribute to it. Find ways to collaborate...
Click to read more »per WP:PSTS.--Savonneux (talk) 02:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Just fyi: The WP:5P specifically states that we include "elements of general and specialized encyclopedias...
Click to read more »what we need instead are a super-ordinate level of policies just below the 5P which would allows us to somewhat more precisely and consistently coordinate...
Click to read more »for AfD should be on those proposing deletion. This article satisfies WP:5P and does not pass WP:DP and should be kept because of the above reasons, including...
Click to read more »March 2010 (UTC) At one point, I wanted to replace all of policy with WP:5P (to make a long story short), that didn't quite work out either. I think we're...
Click to read more »interfere with getting started. The quick overview for beginners is Wikipedia:5P. LeadSongDog come howl! 19:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Honestly I have been...
Click to read more »regarding ownership are simply unacceptable per WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, and WP:5P. Unfortunately, these are patterns, not isolated incidents, in my opinion...
Click to read more »in other media besides just the game. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. per WP:5P - "Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. It incorporates elements of general...
Click to read more »be a suitable WP article. Kitfoxxe (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC) As WP:5P says, Wikipedia "combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias...
Click to read more »lawyers.--Kotniski (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC) I have found following WP:5P good enough for most purposes. The problem is that a number of people are...
Click to read more »process when you've never even heard of the Wikipedia namespace or found WP:5P yet? And don't forget the reference (which has to be cited in a completely...
Click to read more »interesting. To me it underlines how important it is for Wikipedia to stick to the 5P (including wp:5P4 which even some sysops now seem to see as aspirational)...
Click to read more »article (as opposed to a passing interest). If there's disagreement, cite WP:5P. If disagreement continues, perhaps leave a note to the article's Project...
Click to read more »encyclopedias show definitive notability for the purpose of inclusion per WP:5P and WP:NOTPAPER. The article is reliably sourced, and works to counter bias...
Click to read more »catching on yet, unlike, let's say, santorum. There's nothing against WP:5P or WP:BOLD that would prevent someone from merging the two articles during...
Click to read more »restricts editing at Wikipedia (aside from the basic principles of WP:42 and WP:5P) is to protect Wikipedia from that kind of crap. We simply aren't well served...
Click to read more »article only needs 1,000 pixels, then those extra 999,000 pixels violate WP:5P#3. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Every SVG can render over 1...
Click to read more »essays and convey nothing more than incidental personal opinion, save for WP:5P, for which you provide an idiosyncratic interpretation that other editors...
Click to read more »quick as posisble. That whole idea is contrary to the ethos of Wikipedia 5P. Editors sometimes take months to complete an article if the complexity of...
Click to read more »what makes a good (and featured) article. These policies are central to WP:5P, which has as #1, "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia". --Aude (talk) 03:50, 5 November...
Click to read more »