User talk:Webmgr

Welcome!

Hello, Webmgr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay (talk) 08:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I beg to differ on the subject of your neutrality. However, I do appreciate the fact that you have chosen to contact me regarding the matter. The article has served the purpose for which it was intended. Ms. ----, If you happen to have a free weekend; Bavaria is quite beautiful. I have fond memories of a winter sleigh ride to Neuschwanstein Castle. Enjoy your new posting.(LycianFelix (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LycianFelix (talk • contribs)

Just to let you know, I nominated Punta Delgada for G6 speedy deletion since there are no links to the items mentioned in the disambiguation page. If the articles exist, add the links please.--Unionhawk ^{Talk E-mail Review} 15:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Webmgr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Karsten Voigt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Olga Holtz, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~oholtz/vita.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Olga Holtz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

This isn't to discourage you from making an article about her; she has an article on German Wikipedia. However, if you are going to do that you cannot copy and paste her CV from an external website; even though some of it was paraphrased, it was far too close to let go. When it gets deleted, I'd encourage you to recreate the article without the infringing material. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Have added interwiki link. Keep up the good work; I really appreciate your contribution at maintaining WP's quality standards. --Webmgr (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I wanted to compliment you for reworking that article; it looks good now. Thanks for your hard work!! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allison Stanger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Stanger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. aprock (talk) 05:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Paris Pact Initiative, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Macedonia and Trafficking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article Carsten Jacobson has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Aaron Booth (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Philip Mudd, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.globalintelligenceforum.com/BIOMudd.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Philip Mudd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 19:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

As an experienced editor you will be aware that simply changing a few words here and there is insufficient to create an article here. A full rewrite is required, perhaps using that original text as a citation. Your article has a substantial verbatim text match with the original, and other words show only light changes. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

As an experienced editor, have you considered the possibility that there might have been a copyright-free source for the bio of a former government official? Such as [1] and [2], maybe? --Webmgr (talk) 06:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Oer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OER (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article Richard Moore (engineer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Yworo (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Would his official bio, from his own university web page, already referenced under "external links," suffice? --Webmgr (talk) 07:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

No, footnote your articles about living people when you create them, or don't create them. Sources must be reliable, third-party secondary sources, not primary ones affiiated with or written by the subject. Yworo (talk) 07:27, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

...unless they meet the requirements listed on WP:SELFPUB --Webmgr (talk) 07:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nope, primary sources alone do not establish notability. See the general notability guideline. An article with no secondary sources at all will be deleted. Typically, a minimum of two reliable, independent, third-party sources are needed to establish notability. We don't write biographies of people for whom no other third-party biographical sources exist. Yworo (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the criteria for academics would apply. --Webmgr (talk) 08:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Only if you can establish verifiability using independent, third-party, reliable sources. We do not take the subject's word for their accomplishments. We use self-published pages from the subject only for personal data such as date and place of birth, residence, etc. If you can establish the facts through reliable independent third-party sources, then the criteria for academics would apply. The verifiability requirement isn't negotiable, it is required. Yworo (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok, so I forgot to add a source for this tiny contribution. It may appear a quick solution to simply delete unsourced contributions, rather than making the effort of amending another user's slight. In the long run, however, such unforgiving practice frustrates well-intentioned authors, not just women, and discourages further participation. Verifying and adding missing sources may be an annoying chore, but it immediately improves the article, and it establishes a work atmosphere that benefits the WP project at large. Blindly reverting and deleting, on the contrary, isn't helpful — neither for the article nor for the overall collaborative climate. --Webmgr (talk) 04:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard G. Olson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page With honors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The toolserver is brilliant; I am starting to wonder though why the 'enhanced editing toolbar' here the 'insert link' dialogue merely states 'Page exists' when really it should say 'Page exists BUT that is only a redirect/disamb.' --Webmgr (talk) 05:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Although the Will McBride photo has a web presence, I do not see WP:RS on the net with encyclopedic content that makes it WP:N. You need some RS to use as WP:ICs. Until you can find them, I have removed the image link from More Demi Moore.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

→User_talk:TonyTheTiger#More_Demi_Moore --Webmgr (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photos are primary sources. You need secondary sources that discuss this photo in an encyclopedic way.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Alright then: This description page mentions the scandal that the "primary source" caused; the "reliable source" still being the archives of the Museum of German History. --Webmgr (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Webmgr. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Hans Noel, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Hans Noel to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 21:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Source was indicated in article history. --Webmgr (talk) 21:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Feldberg Foundation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Morris, Geoffrey Smith and James Gowans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just had a look at this article and it looks like a cut-and-paste from the German WP. This is fine, provided that proper attribution is given. For this, you should put the {{translated page}} template on the article's talk page. In addition, the translation if far from complete. For example, you left things like [[John O'Keefe (Neurowissenschaftler)|John O'Keefe]], which gives a redlink (of course, because we don't use German disambiguators), but who has an article (unsurprisingly, as he got a Nobel Prize last Monday): [[John O'Keefe (neuroscientist)|John O'Keefe]]. The same goes for names of institutions and universities, which often have articles here, but under their English names, which here are more appropriate than the German names, of course. Thanks for your contribution, I didn't know this foundation and I found its history interesting. Hope you'll find some good sources so that the notability tag can go. --Randykitty (talk) 08:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Michael K. Nagata, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.learningace.com/doc/4596486/d75e0c91e06c883be479d5e091ed1fd7/bgnagatasbiography.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

...may it please the bot to read my sourcing in the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_K._Nagata&action=history --Webmgr (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

There are a few other sites that have the same material. I understand that you state that it is public domain, could you provide where this is stated on the publisher's site? Also, in the future, references are placed in-text, not in the edit summary. Check out our page on referencing for more details. Thanks! Tek022 | Comments? 07:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

• Hi Webmgr! I've temporarily blanked part of that article and listed it at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2015_March_14 for more eyes to help investigate. As mentioned above, the source you gave when creating the article, http://www.faoa.org/Resources/Documents/MG%20Nagata%27s%20Biography.pdf , specifically claims copyright on all content "unless otherwise noted". The PDF file does not note any change to copyright, so we have to assume copyright. You've said several times that it is in fact PD, so if you can point out where that release is given, we can close this out without further delay. Thanks, Crow^Caw 22:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Foreign Area Officers Association which advertised that luncheon with Nagata in Fort McNair along with his bio is tied to the U.S. Navy's Naval Postgraduate School, so I find it only reasonable to assume that such an organization on such an occasion would publish Nagata's official military bio which as a work of the USG is in the public domain. What is your alternative explanation, a scenario which would constitute a copyright claim to a list of dates and ranks? (cf. threshold of originality) --Webmgr (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Webmgr! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:20, Saturday, July 23, 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zero Days, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaspersky. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Webmgr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating a series of other new articles on notable topics, most recently, 2016 Hanover stabbing. E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Well, thank you, Sir! --Webmgr (talk) 21:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Hanover stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Hanover stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sport and politics (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Webmgr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Webmgr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidential Records Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHCA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

resolved --Webmgr (talk) 08:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teruel Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oliver Kamm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Bell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Kross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zehlendorf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frolov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Frolov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Andrew J. Weinstein, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm the editor who moved your article to draft. I did so because I think the subject has some merit, but you did a very poor job of finding sources. Please find more in-depth coverage of Weinstein before considering a move to the mainspace again. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 11:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MS Isle of Innisfree (2021), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifeboat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Webmgr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew J. Weinstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corinna Miazga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hude.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

fixed. Webmgr (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for contributing to the article Strabag. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 06:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom_Whalen, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Whalen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't even recall. Maybe came across his name via the movie Flatland? h/t IA Webmgr (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Diannaa (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

How can you accouse me of copyright infringment when I was using quotation marks and crediting the source? Webmgr (talk) 12:10, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Warren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Street.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wish the mobile app would flag that. Now resolved. Webmgr (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article Pro domo (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ONEOTHER since 2023, not needed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivey (talk - contribs) 21:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karl-Rudolf Korte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2015 migrant crisis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article Grand Pacific Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article currently does not cite any secondary sources, meaning that notability criteria are not satisfied and inclusion is not warranted.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Qwerty123M (talk) 07:38, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Pacific Drive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Pacific Drive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Qwerty123M (talk) 11:33, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply