Honorifics are not allowed on Wikipedia, unless they are so commonly attached to a person's name, that it's almost impossible to find the name without honorific…
This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.
Honorific
Latest comment: 24 days ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Honorifics are not allowed on Wikipedia, unless they are so commonly attached to a person's name, that it's almost impossible to find the name without honorific in "reliable english sources", which is not the case with Shri and Krishna, there is not even single reliable source provided where Krishna is addressed as "Shri Krishna" evenly throughout the whole source. You provided a source which just uses Shri on the title of the one of the chapters in the book once and that too not for Krishna but for Jagannatha. Also, Shri is in no way exclusive to Krishna for any of the special feats he achieved or any honour he got, to use it as honorific in infobox, similar to knighthood honorifics i.e. Lord, Sir, etc. It's used as a common honorific for many Hindu gods e.g. Shri Rama, Shri Ganesha, Shri Hari and Krishna is just one of them. It's even a common honorific for humans too. Please read WP: honorificsHbanm (talk) 10:55, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see your concern but I have a valid reason behind it as Shri is mostly used as a honorific prefix, but here it's denoting Lakshmi, reflecting his attribution to Radha and Rukmini, no matter they both are considered an incarnation of Lakshmi. In Hinduism, it is commonly practiced to add consort's names before the name of deity and also included in formal writings. More specifically, Shri is used here as an epithet of Lakshmi. I can also locate a TV series on the exact name Shri Krishna by Ramanand Sagar. I think this will give you a more clearer picture. Feel free to argue if you still disagree, I am always here to help you out.
Shri before Krishna is a honorific and not Lakshmi, please provide reliable sources for your claim. Also, there is no practice in Hinduism to add consort's name before deity (Lakshmi-Narayana, Uma-Maheshwara are divine couples, not a single deity), please support your claim with reliable sources. And most importantly, you can't add it as per WP: honorific. Hbanm (talk) 15:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Who told you that honorific is not allowed in Wikipedia? See Issac Newton, where Sir is placed as honorific in the infobox, i, then I want you to go and try to remove that honorific, because you are just saying so. See Shri#Usage which regards Shri as an epithet of Lakshmi in the very first paragraph. Sita-Ram, Gauri-Shankar is not a pair of deity but a combined form, of which I am talking about here. Be relax and just try to understand what I mean. PhantomVorteX(Talk)11:37, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Who told me? I recommend you to see WP: honorifics but I think you are not interested in reading and understanding Wikipedia guidelines and policies, it's clearly evident from your questions and arguments. Sir, Lord as a honorific can only be used when a person gets knighthood honour by government, monarchy, etc or holds any specific position to get this honour. Issac Newton got that honour, as he was knighted by Queen Anne of England in 1705, it's not a general honorific. "Shri" is a goddess in Vedas and epithet of Lakshmi and is also a general honorific, it doesn't mean that prefix "Shri" before anyone's name is goddess "Shri" and not honorific. Shri prefix before Krishna or any other god for that matter is a general honorific and not goddess "Shri", you are claiming it otherwise, provide reliable english sources for your claims. There is nothing for me to understand, Wikipedia works on reliable sources, guidelines and policies not on personal understanding. Also, Sita-Ram, Gauri-Shankar is a combined form, as per you, right? But article Krishna is for a singular deity and not a combined form, there you go. Hbanm (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're invited to the Mentorship noticeboard
Latest comment: 29 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, VortexPhantom. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole or hamster wheel, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the § Survey when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 27 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: An exclusive club Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
In the media: Battle for a soul – who won? Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!
On the bright side: Fatherhood, weather, and diplomacy Father's Day, Canada Day, and the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence.
Latest comment: 22 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello VortexPhantom:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.
Latest comment: 18 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on July 3. Please help translate. The work follows annual plan goals for this fiscal year (July 2026–June 2027).
Wikimania 2026: Wikimania is happening this week! After the event, all streamed sessions will be linked in the program on Eventyay and later uploaded to Commons.
Grantmaking: The Global Resource Distribution Committee has published a Grantmaking Strategy draft that sets out a renewed approach to how the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Fund is distributed across the Wikimedia Movement. The GRDC is requesting feedback from volunteers and affiliates, regardless of whether they are grantees or not.
Movement Ecosystem: A proposal that would update movement affiliate recognition and establish new, connected criteria for eligibility to receive Community Fund grants is now available for community review. You are invited to read the proposal and participate in the discussion until August 7.
Women+ contributions in Wikimedia Tech: A guide based on lived experience on how to address some of the invisible barriers for women+ in more technical Wikimedia spaces and recommendations to become more inclusive. Help further by filling out this survey to better understand technical contributions by women+ across Wikimedia projects until July 20.
Structured Experimentation: A reflection on the first year of structured experimentation highlights successful experiments such as Paste Check, Reference Check, and Tone Check, which improved editing outcomes and have been rolled out to more users, as well as experiments that did not lead to product changes.
Revise Tone test ended: The A/B test of Revise Tone ended on July 9. It showed that newcomer task completion rates increased by 38.7% compared to the default Copyedit task, with no decrease in edit quality. The feature is now available for everyone on the Arabic, English, French, and Portuguese Wikipedias. The plan is to release Revise Tone to more wikis.
Wikidata: The latest Wikidata Platform newsletter (July edition) shares how to identify and rewrite queries that rely on Blazegraph-specific extensions and affected by the migration off Blazegraph.
Discussion Tools: On English Wikipedia, DiscussionTools' Usability Improvements has now become default for talk pages. You can opt-out of these changes at any time in user preferences. With this, Discussion Tools are now fully available at all wikis.
Tech News: The latest highlights from Tech News week 28 and 29 include the new Parsoid parser continues to be deployed to additional wikis, making it easier to introduce new reading and editing features. See also the 72 community submitted tasks that were resolved over the last two weeks. Overall, from April – June 2026 about 337 community tasks were resolved by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Language inclusivity at Wikimania 2026: New approaches to translation and interpretation will be tested at Wikimania this year.
Call for submissions open for Wikimedia Latin America Conference 2026: The Wikimedia community in Latin America has opened the call for session proposals for the Wikimedia Latin America Conference 2026. Community members are invited to submit proposals for the conference program by August 10.
UK Online Safety Act: Ofcom, the United Kingdom's Office of Communications, announced that Wikipedia is not designated as a Category 1 service under the Online Safety Act (OSA). This is an important and welcomed outcome as a Category 1 designation could have included privacy and safety risks to our global community of volunteers.
UN Open Source Week edit-a-thon: Volunteers created 60 new Wikipedia articles and made nearly 700 updates to improve Wikipedia's coverage of UN and open source topics at the second UN Open Source Week edit-a-thon co-hosted by Wikimedia Foundation.
"Don’t Blink": The latest developments from around the world about protecting the Wikimedia model, its people and its values.
"A Wiki Minute" videos: New videos are added to the series answering some of the most common questions such as "Do you still need Wikipedia when AI can answer anything?" and "Does Wikipedia push a political agenda?".
Wikipedia 25 brand collaboration in Indonesia: On 4 July, the Jakarta-based street wear company Ageless Galaxy launched a Wikipedia 25 collection, the first ever Wikipedia Brand Collaboration in Asia. The apparel collection featured hats, t-shirts, and a jigsaw puzzle cardigan. Wikimedians in Indonesia joined Ageless Galaxy for a launch party.
Board Elections Eligibility: There are new proposed eligibility criteria for standing as a candidate in Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election now available for feedback. The requirements are more specific and detailed than in years past, to both inform the community of what the Board needs and to create multiple pathways to the Board for Wikimedians.
For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. If you have feedback or suggestions about the bulletin, let us know at [email protected]. For questions about the Wikimedia Foundation's work, contact us!
Meet the Wikimedians of the Year 2026: The beloved Wikimedian of The Year awards shine the light on exceptional individuals, and through them, on the whole Wikimedia community. Learn about all of this year's winners.
Public policy advocacy: Overview of Wikimania 2026 sessions about public policy advocacy. While not all sessions are recorded, you can watch some by clicking the session.
Users with extended rightspre-conference: 190 users with extended rights from all around the world gathered at a Wikimania pre-conference, to exchange experiences, learn from each other and connect.
Media coverage: The event was mentioned in many media outlets as part of wider coverage about the Wikimedia projects including in Le Monde, El Nacional and Radio France.
Improvement to Reading Lists: Community feedback around the placement of watchstar and watchlist buttons for the Reading Lists beta feature has been incorporated. 93% of participating users reported that it was useful. This feature allows saving articles for later reading – a wishlist item to bring the functionality to web.
Creating custom edit suggestions: With the TextMatch feature, volunteers can now create custom local suggestions within the VisualEditor for improving Wikipedia articles. You can find examples from other communities for inspiration. Share your feedback.
Dark mode for Content Translation:Content Translation now supports dark mode, fulfilling a Community Wishlist request. This brings the tool in line with the accessibility features available in the Vector 2022 and Minerva skins, helping reduce visual fatigue for users translating content.
Mobile page preview: Based on the conclusion of the experiment, mobile page previews feature will not be rolled out. The experiment showed flat retention and negative indicator metrics, suggesting that mobile web readers preferred navigating directly to linked articles rather than using page previews.
Scaling of Explore Feed to iOS: The Explore Feed Refresh initiative was tested with new and casual Wikipedia app readers. The refreshed feed helps readers discover new and relevant content. After a 10.5% increase in engagement with the feed, Home Feed redesign will be scaled to iOS by applying the learnings from the Android release.
Improving Account Creation process: After running several Account Creation Experiments to improve registration completion rates, a new version of the username field on Create Account has been rolled out. Read more.
Tech News: The latest highlights from Tech News week 30 and 31 include that now wikis can restrict editing in the “User” namespace to only the page owner and certain user groups. See also the 50 community submitted tasks that were resolved over the last two weeks.
New bot detection system for all wikis: After a successful trial, which showed evidence of both deterring bots and being easier to use, hCaptcha (our new bot detection system) has been rolled out to all wikis, for account creation, and for most newcomer edits.
For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. If you have feedback or suggestions about the bulletin, let us know at [email protected]. For questions about the Wikimedia Foundation's work, contact us!
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.