User talk:TopoCode

Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Tobias Conradi (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

EdJohnston (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

• See also Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tobias Conradi.
• For the record http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Tobias_Conradi&diff=238835424&oldid=238789977 "Per the above, I have indefinitely blocked TopoCode" ... found guilty of editing country subdivision articles, supporting a common naming scheme and memorising WP TLAs. [1].
  • Not to mention your threat about Tobias having hundreds of accounts, maybe even an admin account. Why say "You can't stop Tobias, he'll always get past you, but I'm not him"? Makes no sense. --Golbez (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • "Not to mention your threat about Tobias having hundreds of accounts, maybe even an admin account." - how is this a threat? It is only an idea of what the reality can be that admins cannot stop. But clever admins will learn. EdJohnston did show where he stands right now.
  • "Why say "You can't stop Tobias, he'll always get past you, but I'm not him"?" - where was that said? TopoCode-blockedbyEdJohnston (talk) 06:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello TopoCode! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 8 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Aylin Yaren - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Mutamadiyah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffetalk 23:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

from this data up to date should be revoked...I'm tire of installing and unistalling apps since 2012, This is bullying,no peace for me in webs that I download to enjoy browsing ever frustrate with a third party sign in 😭 Filgona (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply