User talk:TheProEditor11

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Hi TheProEditor11! I noticed your contributions to Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DreamRimmer (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Sinha. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ekdalian Sir, It is to be submitted that the edits I did to Sinha surname and family name is completely based on original research and verified reliable sources. It is also pertinent to mention that the aforesaid surname is used by Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthas (specially by Ambashthas. I have proof that this title is mostly and typically used by Kayasthas and Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthas. You can even confirm it from Google. I agree that I am a new editor on this platform and hence, it would be possible that I have made mistakes on editing but this editing was based on reliable sources. I know several people who have surname Sinha and are Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthas (typically Ambashthas) in Bihar, Jharkhand, and whole East India. There are several people on whom, articles are written on Wikipedia are having Sinha surname and most people belong to Kayastha (typically Ambashthas). Read Shatrughan Sinha, Jayant Sinha, Yashwant Sinha, Sachidanand Sinha, Yashvardhan Kumar Sinha, etc, my talk page and other web articles on Google. Even I am also Sinha surname and family name holder and I belong to Chitraguptavanshi Ambashtha Kayastha. It might be possible that you are right but by my researches, I am totally right. I researched from Google search engine. I also researched by talking to more than 21 people, they all belonged from Ambashtha subgroup. I also read blogs of several people on Google who have Sinha as their surname and family name, they all belonged from Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha (all were Ambashthas. This editing was done on original search and verified reliable sources. If you even don't believe and you think if I am lying, you can search on google and read several blogs on Google. Please rollback the article(s) to my edits after verifying. If you think that I am wrong again, you can come and contact me here again. Please cross-verify and come. My humble request to everyone, Please think and do research before you write anything on my Talk Page.

Yours faithfully,

TheProEditor11 TheProEditor11 (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello TheProEditor11, I completely understand what exactly you mean, but please note that such original research is simply against our policy; read WP:OR. The only proof you require (in order to add/modify statements in any of our articles) is reliable and verifiable sources, as per WP:RS & WP:V. And yes, as a new editor, you may not be aware of our policies, but I am sure you will learn from these experiences, and contribute here successfully! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 14:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ekdalian,

I am a new Wikipedia editor but not a new Wikipedia reader and user. I started reading Wikipedia somewhere in 2020 and I am aware of most of the policies of Wikipedia but I was somehow both aware and unaware of this policy of Wikipedia that I have to add reliable sources for such edits. But the edit I did to both surname and family name Sinha is surely right. Please help me out because I am puzzled what can be a good reliable sources for this edit? Can I add someone's personal blog or another website because Wikipedia's policies say that we have to add sources from Google but blogs and other websites also come by searching on Google. I am sure that my edit is correct but I can't prove due to confusion. If you will tell me something(s) helpful about sources then it would be great. I would again request you gentleman that - only If you find my edits correct then please rollback it.

Thanks! TheProEditor11 (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, you are not supposed to use blogs or other websites in caste related articles! We need high quality modern texts by reliable authors. I shall also try to find such sources for your edit. You may check Google books using proper search keywords. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 07:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Ekdalian Thank You for Your Help. Do try to find sources for my edits too as you have more experience in editing than me. I will also try to check Google Books and then add a proper and reliable source on my edit. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by me and on the other hand, I am very grateful for your help.

Thanks! TheProEditor11 (talk) 07:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheProEditor11! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:08, Sunday, June 11, 2023 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ujjwal Chaurasia. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NBIO is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NBIO for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techno Gamerz, which is about the same person.

There is also an article.Ujjwal Chaurasia, which has also been nominated for deletion. The article should be deleted, and this draft is declined for possible iprovement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ujjwal Chaurasia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, My article was rejected, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 16:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created in error! TheProEditor11 (talk) 15:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheProEditor11. Following our discussion at the Teahouse. You want to make a contribution to a deletion discussion which is at the link: WP:Articles for deletion/Mac Taylor. The first thing to note is that this won't be a vote; it will be a place for editors to place their views in light of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The editor(s) with the best arguments for or against deletion will prevail when an experienced person (usually an admin) will decide what to do, based on the arguments made. As far as I can tell, the discussion will focus on whether Mac Taylor (a fictional character) is notable enough to have a stand-alone article, or information about him should instead solely reside in CSI: NY#Mac Taylor. The most relevant notability guideline is Wikipedia:Notability (fictional characters), which you should read carefully before you add your comment. If you want to add to the delete voices, you need not just to say that the currect article doesn't demonstrate notability from the sources it uses but also that you personally don't think that such sources exist to improve the article. If you want to argue to keep the article, you will either need to suggest further sources that together with the ones already in the article get it over the line to notability. Technically, to make your addition to the discussion you need to click on the "edit source" link just beside Mac Taylor's name and article link near the top of the deletion discussion. Then scroll to the very bottom and add your opinions, starting with either:

• Keep (then your reasons for keeping)

or

• Delete (then your reasons for deleting)

Note the use of three ' marks to create a bolded word to ensure it is easy for the person who closes the discussion to see your overall view. Make sure to sign your contribution with four ~ characters so it is will have your name and timestamp. Preview the page before save/publishing the changes, so you can check all looks OK before the save. If you have any doubts about what to do, then post them here and I'll help further. Good luck! Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for explaining this! Means a lot :) TheProEditor11 (talk) 15:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chitragupta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Keep Reverting Sir 🙏🏻. Keep reverting without seeing the facts. I just wrote the fact. If a person is assigned the role of both Brahmin and Kshatriya (according to Hindu mythology), that person is called Brahmakshatriya. This is the fact that you reverted without seeing the reason. If you think that I made a mistake, Keep my edit reverted but if you think that I am correct, then please take time and undo your edit. Please reply if you want to make me something understand more because I am very new here as compared with you. Sorry for any inconvenience and Thank you for contacting through this talk page :). TheProEditor11 (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You need to cite reliable source for each and every statement here, hope you understand! Otherwise, even if you are right, someone will surely revert your edit since unsourced statements are considered here as original research (OR). I want you to contribute and that's the reason I explained! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I will find sources for the statement but I still think that this is a fact so it is correct (If a person is assigned the role of both Brahmin and Kshatriya {according to Hindu mythology}, that person is called Brahmakshatriya). Thanks! TheProEditor11 (talk) 02:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://web.archive.org/web/20120405033402/http://www.nird.org.in/brgf/doc/brgf_BackgroundNote.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:List of 250 most-backward districts (2006) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 06:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I understand the reason you are telling but the article I submitted is from government sources so it is not a copyrighted content. TheProEditor11 (talk) 12:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kindly do not add honorifics like "Sri" or "ji" to content as it is not neutral per Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and always remember to add sources. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 11:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay! I will not add honorifics. I always add reliable sources in my edits except in some rare cases! Thanks! TheProEditor11 (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Swami Avdheshanand Giri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 07:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Aviram7 Thank-you for your wishes! I worked really hard creating this article by reading all the policies, finding citations and using correct english. Now, I can say "Mehnat Rang Layi" (Hard work pays-off). This was my first article and I will doing more and more here for sure! TheProEditor11 (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Administrator changes

• Ganesha811
• JPxG

• Ajpolino
• Lourdes
• Mairi
• RockMFR
• Somno
• WilyD

Beeblebrox → Just Step Sideways

CheckUser changes

• Beeblebrox
• Opabinia regalis

Oversight changes

• Beeblebrox
• Opabinia regalis

Guideline and policy news

• Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
• The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
• Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Administrator changes

Clovermoss

Dennis Brown

• Julia W
• Marasmusine
• PBS

CheckUser changes

• Aoidh
• HJ Mitchell
• Sdrqaz
• Spicy
• ToBeFree
• Vanamonde93
• Z1720

Maxim

• Enterprisey
• Izno
• SilkTork

Oversighter changes

• Aoidh
• Firefly
• Sdrqaz
• ToBeFree
• Z1720

Maxim

• Enterprisey
• Izno
• SilkTork

Arbitration

• Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
• The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

• Red-tailed hawk
• Robertsky

• Ameliorate!
• Ancheta Wis
• Anthony Bradbury (deceased)
• Cobi
• Ev
• Moondyne
• Worm That Turned

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

• Enterprisey
• Izno

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Kanak Bhawan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DreamRimmer (talk) 03:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. Thank you for your work on Kanak Bhawan. DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include some sources in the transport section. Also, it would be great to find some more reliable sources instead of just relying on the Ayodhya government website, since it's considered a primary source.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DreamRimmer (talk) 03:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DreamRimmer: Thanks for letting me know! I tried hard to find but I could find only one reliable source for the transport section, which was the Ayodhya government website. I will surely try to find sources for it. Also, a Hindi article on Kanak Bhawan already exists. So, kindly add the page in languages section as I don't know how to do it! Thanks! TheProEditor11 (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of 250 most-backward districts (2006), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lala Hanumant Sahay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2409:4073:199:9F44:106D:59A5:AC65:37AF (talk) 10:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I can see that you're giving me "Level-2" warnings for edits on Gazetted Officer. You have reverted and rewrote the article. See, rewriting is not the issue. The issue is that you are removing almost every details from head to toe. You have literally even removed the terms "Gazetted appointment", "ordinary/extraordinary notifiations", departmental details, publisher, authority, etc LITERALLY EVERYTHING. Then, you are removing details about the military ranks which is literally cited by a Law (act) and an article from The Hindu. You are removing "cited" civilian public servant ranks. Don't you know you are removing the whole data like something about officers, pay commission clarification, 2016 renaming of ranks by the Government of India, clarification between Group A-Gazetted and Non-Gazetted and same thing from Group B too. An encyclopedia is made by cherishing each and every data and that too CITED. Please consider not reverting and undoing the whole article to your bogus edits for no reason and that too which is cited by reliable sources. Doing such things is not acceptable here. Also, please read about edit warring and reliable sources. You are most welcome to our Wikipedia Community for doing edits. We need enthusiastic editors like you! Create your account and start the most beautiful journey by diving into the ocean of knowledge!!!! TheProEditor11 (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are edit warring for a lost cause. Wikipedia ia an encyclopedia, not a directory, guide, or manual. You treat Wikipedia as a directory for listing all gazetted posts, which fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Besides, that article itself is non-notable as it fails WP:GNG. Over that, you add large unsourced content with WP:FAKE references, which is unconstructuve. Legodesk.com is an unreliable source that fails WP:RS. Even if there had any reliable sources it still fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. You also forgot that it is not a LIST--2409:4073:4E39:D390:41DE:C49B:4BBB:61A0 (talk) 07:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

If it falls under non-notable article, nominate it for deletion. Okay?.. Please don't edit war here. And second thing second - only you are edit warring. You are removing almost all data from the article, making the whole article meaningless. You are even removing the titular things. Even you are not aware of the WP's. You have also removed many cited things from the article which is cited from ""official government website(s)"" and ""Laws (acts)"". Government websites are not unreliable source so you cannot remove them. You cannot blank out correct information. Please understand the policies. One revert and we are entering onto the three revert criteria and edit warring. Please take care!! TheProEditor11 (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do see the references like """The Indian Express, Government of India, The Notaries Act, Ministry of Labour and Employement, Amar Ujala, Government Civil Service schedule, idse official website, The Hindu, Department and Directorate of Publication, Government of India, DRDO, etc TheProEditor11 (talk) 09:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2409:4073:4E39:D390:658F:4C46:47CF:ACFC (talk) 10:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I would like to point out that you have not followed our policies related to neutral point of view! In spite of some of the existing sources (in the article on Madan Mohan Malaviya) clearly saying that he was born in a (Gaur) Brahmin family, you have removed the same! As per NPOV, we must stick to the sources and mention both. You must be aware of the discretionary sanctions related to South Asian social groups, caste in this case. Please be careful in future. Ekdalian (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well ah, @Ekdalian, I have tried to follow all of our policies to edit the page Madan Mohan Malaviya. Make sure that for my claim, I have already provided cited sources (infact 5 citations). Moreover, for your NPOV allegation, note that I am not inclined towards any caste either for proving their superiority or for making everyone belonging to the same caste. I have just a quite good knowledge of the specific Kayastha caste since it is my community. As you said he was born in the abovementioned Brahmin family, I preferred adding only one caste because my edits had already got removed once (obv by you) and now, you are the same person who is asking why didn't you mention both. Simply, I have provided reliable sources so I just added the caste as per my sources. I don't know why but it is very pathetic to surely get a ridiculous talk page warning no matter if you have provided citations/sources, you are right, or you are wrong too. If possible, I would highly request you to please withdraw this warning as it is making my talk page look dirty as hell to me for no reason :(. Anyways, I will be careful in future and I will "mention both" if such cases come. Thanks! ;) TheProEditor11 (talk) 12:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is not a warning message; I just wanted to inform you how to follow our NPOV policy in future. It is not at all ridiculous; and please avoid mentioning that you have added Kayastha since you belong to the caste (conflict of interest)! We are here to act as neutral editors; we should rather forget our caste while editing here in order to be completely neutral. Hope you have realised now that this is not a warning message. Ekdalian (talk) 17:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ratnahastin (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why the hell I am getting these types of warning alerts? I have not done any type of disruption in my edits to caste-related topics. Moreover, I have also cited my claims in the edits (I had provided 5 reliable citations including a book from University of California). I would request you to please do not add these types of template warnings specially when someone has provided citations. Furthermore, I would also request you to withdraw this warning, if possible! TheProEditor11 (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

That was not a warning message. It's merely a reminder of contentious topic designation of south asian social groups topic area in which you have shown interest. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for defending the Wikimedia Commons article from that kerfuffle we had with over 20 different IPs.They have been ranged block for 72 hours now. Again, thank you!!!! TheWikiToby (talk) 16:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Phew! That was breathtaking experience for us. Thank-you for your incredible support too!! ;) TheProEditor11 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

this revert. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kobi_Simmons&diff=next&oldid=1245481381

It's standard at WP to refer to the team as I indicated, not as you reverted. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:571:B2E5:C31C:BA89 (talk) 07:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reaching out! I have reverted my edit to your edits! TheProEditor11 (talk) 07:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ujjwal Chaurasia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:District and sessions judge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "District and sessions judge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TheProEditor11. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ujjwal Chaurasia".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Shiv Mandir, Maharashtra was clearly a hijacked article. Please just revert it yourself next time. Curbon7 (talk) 09:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ok... Thank-you for explaining and clarifying the issue..!! Means a lot :) - TheProEditor11 (talk) 03:13, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm LaffyTaffer. I noticed that you changed the personal pronouns of an individual in the article Sam Morelos. Wikipedia refers to all people, including transgender and nonbinary people, by the pronouns they have most recently requested for themselves; this applies to all phases of their lives, unless they have requested otherwise. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 18:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@LaffyTaffer Thank you for your message. Till now, no source has been provided in the article that the subject has requested to use and refer them as transgender/non-binary (they/them). If you have any source, then please don't hesitate to provide it on the article otherwise it will (probably) be reverted again, if not by me then by someone else. Thanks and I hope you understood.. :) ... TheProEditor11 (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The subject's pronouns are sourced in personal life to the following links: [1] [2] Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 18:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Now, I feel free and happy since the sources have been added.. I have also verified the same and have also removed the warnings made by me on the talk page of the IP address.

Thanks.- TheProEditor11 (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much, please be sure to check for sourced claims in areas such as personal life in the future before reverting. Though I'll take responsibility myself for not fully updating pronouns and terminology when I did a check on the article a few days ago. Best regards. Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 19:05, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hahaha.. There was no edit summary by the IP address. Also, I tried checking on Google and there is really and absolutely no significant news coverage about the same. Also, the websites that are used as MAJOR sources refers the subject as "she". It made (and probably still makes) the doubts even more clearer. Since, the latest identification has actually been made by the subject, the edits by the IP are accepted as correct. TheProEditor11 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey, it’s not possible for Stephen to have been a freshman in college in 2010 having been born in 1998 as he falsely claims. Please revert your edit and see the cited source. He obscures his age purposefully for predatory purposes. ~2026-27578-87 (talk) 06:43, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Thank you for contacting me. First of all, you have NOT provided ANY sources for your edits. Moreover, you have just provided a huge edit summary 1. However, that edit summary contradicts your own edit as you said "Removed unsourced date of birth (March 1, 1998)" but you are yourself adding the DOB in question i.e. March 1, 1992 and prior to your edit, there was NO date of birth in the article because it has always been a part of controversy (from perusal of talk page of the article). There is no question that you are changing DOB, you are just adding a new one without any sources, please read WP:RS. Moreover, it is also pertinent to mention here that your edit summary further provides that you have made this edit relying on a Swimming Roster (by the way, you haven't even cited that too with your edits) and you further claim that it "INDIRECTLY" indicates that his DOB is somewhere in 1991/1992 (you are not specific even on this point). Please be assured that such kind of Original Research is simply against our policy, read WP:OR because everything you are adding is based on your own research. Please consider taking a look on Wikipedia policies and if you want to add the DOB, please do so with reliable sources. Also, if you have anything to discuss with fellow editors, consider doing so by adding a topic on the talk page of the article but refrain from adding unsourced original research based stuff. Regards ! :) TheProEditor11 (talk) 07:04, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you so much for reverting my terrible mistake on Bite The Ballot! Cooldudeseven7 💬 talk~📜 ctb~🖊️ gb 14:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome! Just doing my part.. To err is human, we all commit mistakes sometimes.. :) - TheProEditor11 (talk) 14:53, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Lala Hanumant Sahay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Dan arndt Thanks for letting me know! I have nominated it for deletion since the draft article is just a duplicate (and uncited) version of main space article. With regards, TheProEditor11 (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article Lala Hanumant Sahay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources - lacks any inline citations

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Dan arndt (talk) 05:42, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can you please wait?? I am working on citations right now! TheProEditor11 (talk) 05:44, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Dan arndt Since it was a translation from Hindi Wikipedia to English Wikipedia, I was working on citations. I have added several WP:RS now and the article qualifies WP:RS and WP:BIO now. I will be adding few more RS too. I have removed the deletion template as the problems as stated by you has been resolved. TheProEditor11 (talk) 06:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Munsiff Court, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indians was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I recently modified the Trip.com Wikipedia page, you were right to remove this edit as it wa sunexplained (I missclicked while typing the reason). I've published the reasons now and modified the framing, so instead of just removing the claim which was true, I've stated it was as of 2017. As of 2025, Expedia Group won the title of World's Leading Online Travel Agency 2025 by World Travel Awards, and Booking.com was the most visited individual website while generating much more revenue.

Other than that, good day to you. ~2026-29455-50 (talk) 08:40, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Always consider adding WP:RS with your claims otherwise it will be reverted again if not by me then by someone else. With regards, TheProEditor11 (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I figured it is more respectful to ~2026-30178-54 that I reply here, instead of continuing a discussion about Wikipedia policy on their Talk page.

As a matter of Wikipedia policy, you are 100% correct when you quote WP:V. This is why I only restored their edit with a proper source. When I suggested that it is important not to WP:BITE the newcomers, I was thinking of the part of that behavioral guideline which says:

Next time you feel frustrated with a newcomer’s mistake, take it as an opportunity to nurture potential contributors. Consider improving upon a newcomer's edit rather than reverting it.

Certainly, I am sympathetic that you are working through a lot of low-quality edits. I see that your user page has a userbox specifically about fighting vandalism, and your recent edits are a great service to Wikipedia! I just felt it was harsh to warn this particular user that "[their] edits appear to constitute vandalism", when they added true content to an article, in the correct place, and it only took me 10 seconds to add a source. Vandalism is described as such, in the article you linked on that user's Talk page:

On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose...

This user's edit to Lagos does not appear, to me, like the work of someone who is deliberately obstructing or defeating Wikipedia's purpose. NeuroJasper (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you once again for your message! And yes, you did a great job by continuing the discussion here. I appreciate that you took my quoted WP:V part seriously and added the source for it. I give Wikipedia policies the utmost priority while working with edits and I am totally aware about the WP:BITE "behavioral guideline". However this case is clearly not a case of biting as:-

The IP added a completely unsourced addition (nickname) to the article. I did NOT say that the edit was "Vandalism" in the edit summary, I used the word "Unsourced" instead (you can verify). Now the question is why I still gave the editor a "Level-2 Vandalism warning" (you are also trying to surround the whole case as to why I gave such "harsh" warning). The reason behind that is - that the edit they made to an other page few minutes ago - Lagos Island constituted vandalism and due to this, the IP was previously given "Level-1 Vandalism warning" by a fellow editor. So when you revert an edit and you are redirected to the Talk page of the user where you have to put on General Notice/Warning and you see that few minutes ago they were already warned by someone - it is safe to assume that the user is WP:NOTHERE and is trying to deliberately obstruct or defeat the project's purpose and give the next higher level warning. Moreover, as you quoted "next time you feel frustrated with a newcomer’s mistake......." - I want to make it very clear that I was not frustrated with the mistake, I just acted neutrally and ideally what a reasonable editor would do or try to do. Coming to the part "consider improving upon a newcomer's edit rather than reverting it.", I searched regarding it on web but the results I got were of unreliable sources like FaceBook (and FaceBook reels), YouTube, blogs etc. Last line you said forms your opinion that the edit does not "appear to you.....". There is a famous saying - "Opinions are like arseholes-everybody has one, and they all stink". I acted as per policies and guidelines and hence, I think that this is certainly not a case of Biting [as you are alleging].

Last but not the least, THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! for your humble wishes and appreciation to my edits.. It means a lot.. :) With regards, TheProEditor11 (talk) 09:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you too!
JanManisijun has gifted you her own personal WikiLove:
Thank you too cookie!
(For thanking me at some point in my time on Wikipedia).

jan Manisijun (Magnesium) (talk) (contribs) 13:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for the Cookie-WikiLove.. means a lot :) - TheProEditor11 (talk) 15:04, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheProEditor11. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:28, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Thank you so much for granting me the perm. I have already started using it in my day-to-day counter-vandalism work and I can say that it has made my work much easier. Right now, I am using both rollback and Twinkle together. I am fully aware of the policies as you stated and I use it only when the vandalism/disruption is clear and unambiguous. Once again, thank you!!... With regards, TheProEditor11 (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

if you Google Kurt urbig you can see that he is an engineer. ~2026-23335-47 (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thank you for your message. It is requested to kindly refrain from doing WP:OR, and consider adding WP:RS for any such of your claims. Otherwise, it will be reverted again, if not by me then by someone else. With regards, TheProEditor11 (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

i have left a reliable source for the information, if you Google Kurt urbig you can see that my added information is correct. ~2026-23335-47 (talk) 11:29, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your edit which was reverted by me had NO source. So, you hadn't added any source for the claims you made. What you are doing is original research which is simply against our policies (Read WP:OR). You are required to add proof (in order to add/modify statements in any of our articles) which should be reliable and verifiable sources, as per WP:RS & WP:V. I further request you to kindly adhere to WP:NPOV while making edits. I hope you understood. Also, please consider replying to the messages instead of creating a whole new topic every time. Thanks and regards! TheProEditor11 (talk) 11:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

i'm sorry, that's too much for me, I will stop my engagement for the English Wikipedia. ~2026-23335-47 (talk) 12:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi TheProEditor11... Signed your guestbook and added it on a list on your behalf. Cheers! Volten001 ^☎ 03:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! :) TheProEditor11 (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy birthday! Hi TheProEditor11! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:38, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, TheProEditor11! --☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk

☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 03:26, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply