User talk:Techoliver298

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Madin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Madin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome Techoliver298!

Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to MMMBop, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Side2SideDW (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 123.136.117.236 (talk) 04:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. 115.164.171.15 (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Madin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Madin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheRedBox (talk) 04:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Disco-pop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

This source does not call it a "synth pop" song, in fact it doesn't even call it pop. Please stopping adding your own WP:Original research, it is not allowed on Wikipedia. This will be your final warning, as I'll be asking admin help if you add OR genres again to any Meghan Trainor song articles. Regards--NØ 09:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boogie2988, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source "ArticleBio" was removed. Please see WP:RSN#Lawrence O'Donnell $4 million salary for details. Thanks! — Newslinger talk 01:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Side2SideDW. Thank you. 2402:1980:246:96AD:6583:CC74:D949:8DF6 (talk) 04:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chris Madin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disco-pop. Since you had some involvement with the Disco-pop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Funk-pop. Since you had some involvement with the Funk-pop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on JT Music (Musical Group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Your page JT Music was a copy-paste of their website. We can't copy-paste text here to Wikipedia since that counts as copyright infringement, I've tagged the article for deletion accordingly. Remember to summarize in your own words what secondary sources say. If you ever have any questions, come ask at the Teahouse – Thjarkur (talk) 03:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JT Music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JT Music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. You have new messages at Talk:JT Music.
Message added 02:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, including a band, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Techoliver298. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Techoliver298|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the band or an associated company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the band claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. I can't see any evidence at all that this band is notable enough for an article here.
• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions, reviews or collections of spamlinks.
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

Hi Techoliver298! You created a thread called JT Music at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as JT Music, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 07:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Techoliver298. I noticed that you recently used superbhub.com and ecelebritymirror.com as a source for biographical information in Moira Kelly. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that either meets reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Massey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Barrett. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Tinpo Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five Points.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Tinpo Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Tinpo Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Tinpo Lee, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Lightoil (talk) 02:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Matt Frewer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 23:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bryan Cranston into Kyle Edward Cranston. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Weinberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ER.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Weinberg, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Weinberg (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Kyle Edward Cranston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://gatekeepersnews.com/2023/03/30/breaking-bad-see-star-bryan-cranston-net-worth-and-biography/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Weinberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ER.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I was scrolling through the recently created redirects, and stumbled across the redirects JJ Cummings and J.J. Cummings, both recently created. Does the target of these redirects actually go by the name "JJ"? A quick google search didn't turn up everything, and he is not listed on the JJ (nickname) page, but I have never heard of this person before, so I wouldn't know whether it is a name he uses. As JJ is a nickname in its own right, I feel like a redirect from it could potentially be misleading if it is not used as a nickname (and a google search for JJ Cummings does pull up plenty of unrelated results, so I feel like that could be the case here). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Twotopia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 2 § Twotopia until a consensus is reached. CapitalSasha ~ talk 01:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Kyle Edward Cranston, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect J.J. Cummings has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 3 § J.J. Cummings until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey! When creating redirects like Kevin Duran and Durant Durant, can you provide reasons why these redirects are useful? I've never seen anyone confuse Duran and Durant – doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but when neither "Kevin Duran" or "Durant Durant" pull up their intended targets on the first page of google search results, I start to doubt that their potential usefulness outweighs the potential for confusion (especially with Kevin Duran, because there are people by that exact name). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Kevin Duran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 10:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. Thank you for your work on Ashley Tisdale-French. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I have to question whether this is ever used, or whether it is just speculation that she uses a hyphenated name.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. Thank you for your work on Jennifer Hack. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It is questionable whether she actually uses this name, so RFD can be done .

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. Thank you for your work on Jennifer Veal-Hack. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It is questionable whether she actually uses this name, so RFD can be done .

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Durant Durant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 11 § Durant Durant until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Kevin Duran has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 11 § Kevin Duran until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Durant Durant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username AngusWOOF and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Avril Lavigne-Kroeger, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 15 § Avril Lavigne-Kroeger.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey. I'd like to note that I raised some concerns about your creation of redirects in the above deletion discussion for Avril Lavigne-Kroeger – it should have notified you, but that wasn't so much directed at you, and I wanted to leave another comment here.

It's hard for me to tell if you're reading what I say or not, since you don't respond to talk page messages. On a project like this, collaboration is key – I don't want to ask you to respond if you're not comfortable doing so, but I would like to know if you see what I say or not (any response, even thanking me for the edit as a sign that you've seen this, would be good; that's as far as I'm aware a public log, so others will be able to see you did it too).

Anyway, please be careful that redirects you create are actually going to be used. I've encountered multiple redirects of yours that have zero results on google after putting them inside quotation marks. It's a good idea to do a check to see if a name you're making a redirect from is actually used by the target – there's no point to creating redirects from names like Jennifer Veal-Hack if they get 0 google hits, as nobody is going to be using them as a search term. Redirects are made to aid navigation, and if nobody is ever going to type in the title they are at, then they're of no use to Wikipedia; this is even worse when a redirect has potential negative consequences like confusion with other people.

I should also warn you that if you keep violating policy by creating inappropriate redirects, you could easily get into trouble at some point down the line and potentially get blocked. I am willing to help direct you towards which redirects are good ideas to create and which aren't, but I can't do that without knowing you're even seeing these messages. If you do see this, the most important thing you should take away is to make sure redirects you create are valid search terms used by people. A birth name redirect is good, a first name + middle initial + last name redirect is probably fine (assuming it's not shared with anyone else), but stuff like unused first initial + middle initial + last name redirects (see: J. J. Cummings, likely to be ambiguous), and stuff like married names or hyphenated married names which are unused are probably not good redirects. The best way to check is just to plug it into google inside "quotation marks", like there.

Thanks. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thank you for letting me know. I'll be more careful when creating redirects. Let me know if there is anything else I should know. Techoliver298 (talk) 13:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Jennifer Hack has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 17 § Jennifer Hack until a consensus is reached.

Hey, I nominated 10 of your older redirects for deletion including some mentioned above. If you think any of them will be used, chip into the discussions – if not, no need. I found basically all of these had no hits for the target when searching them up on google inside "quotation marks", which is why I nominated them (full nom statement is in there). Don't worry too much about the past redirects getting deleted – as long as you continue to create useful redirects, it shouldn't be relevant. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 19:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Josephine Frost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

You may get a few more of these as I clean up any redirects that do not seem to be used. Like I said, feel free to contest any of them if you think they are useful. I'm not perfect, though most of my potential mistakes will go through the RFD process where other editors will discuss. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jack Salvatore Jr.. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WP:DOB is one of the more important areas of WP:BLP and requires rigorous sourcing. Toddst1 (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on David O. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Rhea Seehorn-Larson has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Rhea Seehorn-Larson until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Molly Chesnut has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 16 § Unused married name redirects with presumed 0 hits until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The article Jamal Woods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable NFL player and just redirects to a roster page he's not even a part of

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Jamal Woods has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 27 § Jamal Woods until a consensus is reached. Debartolo2917 (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kyle Edward Cranston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Will Buie Jr has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 9 § Will Buie Jr until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. Thank you for your work on Frederick Bluth. User:Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 01:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Owain.davies, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Thomas Fiss, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Owain.davies}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 13:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Owain.davies, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Thomas Fiss, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Fiss.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Owain.davies}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 08:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Miles Marsico has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Miles Marsico until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Techoliver298!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Bagel Frederick Figglehorn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Bagel Frederick Figglehorn until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Bagel Figglehorn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Bagel Figglehorn until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. Thank you for your work on Brad H. Gerstenfeld. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 03:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Techoliver298. Thank you for your work on Donna Arkoff. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 02:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Amanda the Adventurer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 26 § Amanda the Adventurer until a consensus is reached. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric ^talk 03:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Techoliver298. I'm Quaerens-veritatem. I noticed you did not provide edit summaries for your edits of Hailee Steinfeld this month despite Eric's July request. You could have at least added "+ ref". Again, please provide a summary of every edit you make. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Summaries help other editors by (a) providing a reason for the edit, (b) saving the time to open up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists).

According to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit and a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. As a reminder: When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

If the edit is minor, the "This is a minor edit" box can be checked. See, Help:Minor_edit. A good rule of thumb is that only edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content may be flagged as minor edits.

Many who are ignorant of the Wikipedia policy on edit summaries fail to add them. Some ignore this basic brief task; however, failure seems arrogant and inconsiderate specially since summaries are so easy to add. Thank you, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Lauren Sturtevant, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 1 § Lauren Sturtevant.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Peyton Parrish has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § Peyton Parrish until a consensus is reached. asilvering (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Jason Halbert. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See WP:LEAD. Stop shunting lead section material down into the article body. Binksternet (talk) 04:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Albert Yankovic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good work on Andy Martin (American musician). Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 03:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I've noticed recently that you've been adding citations to articles about entertainment figures. Thank you for taking the time to add citations and to ensure that our content is sourced. However, I would like to bring up this set of edits and edit, which appear to have link to AI-generated sites and/or press releases. In general, self-published sources (like press releases) are considered to be relatively low-quality, and AI-generated works are generally not considered to be reliable. Sources like newspapers and news websites and books published by reputable publishers tend to be a bit safer in this regard.

When making edits, especially about living people, would you please be careful regarding the reliability of the sources you are citing before you use them?

Cheers,

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Weinberg, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Weinberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kyle Edward Cranston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Skibadee Toilet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 5 § Skibadee Toilet until a consensus is reached. Plant🌱man (talk) 02:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Jordan Hanson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Best Regards (CP) 23:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Serious WP:REFBOMBing going on. Amazon.com and YouTube links are not reliable and should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael S. Black and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Elizabeth Hannah, from its old location at User:Techoliver298/Elizabeth HannahUser:Techoliver298/Elizabeth Hannah. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Tamara Chambers, from its old location at User:Techoliver298/Tamara ChambersUser:Techoliver298/Tamara Chambers. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 06:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Opm581 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tamara Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 09:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article Jordan Danger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of proper sources and references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ColiverXYZ (talk) 02:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

sources are dire facebook.com YouTube etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Hannah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pegnawl was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires more SIGCOV about artist and music.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brandon Baril and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pegnawl (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Eminem, you may be blocked from editing. Did you really think that AI generated youtube video was real? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 15:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

To Techoliver298: Thanks for contributing information as to the identity of Freddie Highmore's wife. Unfortunately, the Parade article by Debra Wallace (13 June 2025) which you've given as a reference simply repeats on-line speculation. The Parade article cites no source indicating that he has confirmed her identity. The speculation can't be considered encyclopaedic information and should not be included in Wikipedia. Thanks for your understanding! UPU898 (talk) 11:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:15, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello Techoliver298,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kane Parsons for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello I'm a student from LUISS university in Rome and I'm working on a presentation based on wikipedia's crowdsourcing process and one part of the work is to put myself in the shoes of a wikipedia contributor and find out some feeling he receives when editing or writing pages. The questions I would like to receive answers on are the following:

1. What does the editor think and feel:
2. What does the editor say and do:
3. What does the editor hear and see (about its surroundings):
4. What are his pains (what type of frustration does the user feel when contributing):
5. What are his gains (what does make him feel good when contributing):

Active support is really needed so thanks in advance and have a great day Tartaluca (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dear Techoliver298,

Wishing you a very happy wiki anniversary today, celebrating 8 years (as per SUL) of invaluable contributions! Your dedication and hard work, reflected in over 19,822 edits, are a testament to your commitment to the community. Thank you for all you do!

Use this Tool to send wiki anniversary wishes to other amazing Wikimedians.

- : Suyash Dwivedi (💬) 22:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Techoliver298. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 8 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute.Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heather on the Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pommeperson (talk) 05:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Tatiana Ignatieva and Bailey Bass) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Fences&Windows 20:21, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Techoliver298 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I request being unblocked from editing the specific pages. I understand BLP fully now and will not violate on purpose ever again.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:EW but don't even mention that in your unblock request. Nor have you pointed to the consensus you were able to reach with the other editors. You'll need to do that first, before contesting your block. Yamla (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Techoliver298 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here I have violated WP:EW by accident and what does that mean to "point to the consensus with other editors"? I don't understand that.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, Only one open unblock request at a time please. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two key sections lack inline citations to support key assertions. Ideally, every paragraph of a biography of a living person should be supported by at least one reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jackie Sandler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 19:19, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathan Gamble, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Klein was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Tatiana Ignatieva and Bailey Bass) and certain namespaces ((Article)) for repeated BLP violations, by using non-ABOUTSELF social media to post and ignoring an ANI discussion..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Fences&Windows 23:05, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Techoliver298 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

How do I point to the consensus with other editors? I don't understand what that is. Can you help me? Techoliver298 (talk) 00:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Only one unblock request open at a time please. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Techoliver298 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello, I was partially blocked due to "Repeated BLP violations, using non-ABOUTSELF social media to post and ignoring an ANI discussion." This was a mistake and will not happen again. I was not fully aware of the requirements. I apologize to this accidental vandalism. I am requesting an unblock and will not repeat this. I will only edit when it is necessary and I will not abuse the editing process, the appeal system, or any other processes. Techoliver298 (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You've been blocked from editing two pages for less than two weeks. I recommend waiting at least a month to request a full unblock. In that time, edit constructively elsewhere to show you can positively contribute to the encyclopedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) I'm afraid that you're going to have to give more of an explanation before an admin will be happy to unblock you.

This is just a cut & paste of the block reason - just saying you won't do it again isn't enough to show that you know that the problem actually is.

In order to be unblocked, you need to show an understanding of:

1. What you did that caused you to be blocked (what exact actions did you take?),
2. Why this was disruptive/problematic, and
3. How you will approach similar situations in future (what you should have done instead).

Can you please reply to this post with this missing information? Blue Sonnet (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

(Non-administrator comment) Blue-Sonnet, the problems that I caused were I repeatedly was warned about poor sourcing over months, but I ignored the discussion at ANI, and even after I was blocked from two pages on which I was edit warring to include social media posts and I added Facebook as a reference to other biographies.

This was problematic due to the sources not being reliable and were only based off of ABOUTSELF sources and this is a BLP violation.

In the future, I will not use social media as a primary or secondary source. I should have used an article and newspaper sources instead. I understand what I have done wrong and I apologize for these violations. From here on, I will only edit when is necessary and reliable.

Techoliver298 (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

(Non-administrator comment) Hi @Techoliver298, there's no need to post on my Talk page as well - your appeal is in the queue of unblock requests and an admin will review it as soon as they are able. Blue Sonnet (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Techoliver298 please stop asking people about your unblock request. It is in a queue that is monitored. You are welcome to work in draft space in the mean time. Star Mississippi 02:46, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Techoliver298 you can also submit Wikipedia:Edit requests - if these are well formatted, follow the set process for edit requests and are accepted, then it could even help your appeal by showing that you understand how to edit correctly. Blue Sonnet (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Significa liberdade, It appears I cannot edit any pages on the encyclopedia. I cannot constructively edit elswhere which is why i need to be partially unblocked. Meaning, in order for me to prove I cam edit constructively elswhere, I need to be able to edit. I understand being blocked from editing the two specific pages, but not everywhere else. Techoliver298 (talk) 00:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Techoliver298 Why did you sign this post as if you were @Significa liberdade? She didn't write this post - you did? Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

oh I see my error let me fix it. Apologies Techoliver298 (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

You can make edit requests @Techoliver298 or edit on a different project to show competence.

Failing to listen to ANY of the feedback here is not getting you any closer to an unblock. Star Mississippi 13:39, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

OK, I will make edit requests. With an educated guess, how long will it take for me to become partially unblocked? Techoliver298 (talk) 20:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is not an edit request. Please consider this a final warning. You are either being deliberately disruptive or don't have the competence to edit here. Star Mississippi 04:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I apologize. I will read more into "edit requests". From what I researched, you have to talk on the talk page first and wait for feedback on what could be improved in the article. So I'm just a bit confused as I have never been partially blocked and have never needed to make "edit requests" before. So my skills in this area are very limited. Please let me know how to improve. I am sorry. Techoliver298 (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, please look at the links I've given you in my previous comments above. Blue Sonnet (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Andy Martin (American musician) for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room, nor are they a search engine or chatbot. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brandon Baril, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moosa Mostafa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Discourses on Livvy (talk · contribs) 02:41, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Link to section ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 14:40, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

[1] Polygnotus (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I do not quite understand? Techoliver298 (talk) 03:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

In this edit someone (using temporary account ~2026-25202-51)removed one of your comments.

Its allowed to remove your own comments, but not those of others (exceptions exist).

So I reverted and asked if it was you. Polygnotus (talk) 04:15, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh I see, yes that was me. Thanks for reverting! Techoliver298 (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Please do not make COI edit requests on articles you do not actually have a COI regarding, such as Gwen Shamblin Lara, Adrian R'Mante, and I Took a Pill in Ibiza. You are needlessly clogging up the COIREQ backlog. You can just post on talk pages without adding a template. Thank you, MediaKyle (talk) 22:46, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You're still doing it, please stop. MediaKyle (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Apologies, I didn’t realize. Thanks. Techoliver298 (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Kane A. Parsons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 27 § Kane A. Parsons until a consensus is reached. jolielover♥talk 06:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tamara Chambers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jackie Sandler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Techoliver298. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kyle Edward Cranston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply