User talk:TCVCJ

Hello, TCVCJ, and welcome to Wikipedia!

User talk:TCVCJ

Welcome

Hello, TCVCJ, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! wia (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

TCVCJ, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi TCVCJ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

undefined

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, TCVCJ! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk wia (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC) wia (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Back of the Dragon (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia /talk 13:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Back of the Dragon (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cedar Bluff Overlook Park (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia /talk 21:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Back of the Dragon (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
Still no references. Please add references as requested or else we won't be able to accept the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia /talk 21:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cedar Bluff Overlook Park has been accepted

Cedar Bluff Overlook Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Back of the Dragon (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
You've given zero proof that this trail is actually famous. Is it covered extensively in motorcycling magazines or books? If so, cite them. See WP:Referencing for beginners.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cavitt's Creek at Lake Witten has been accepted

Cavitt's Creek at Lake Witten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Back of the Dragon (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Back of the Dragon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Back of the Dragon. Thanks! — Jeraphine (talk) 10:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 13 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Official Coal Miners' Memorial for the Commonwealth of Virginia (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, TCVCJ! I'm Primefac. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Primefac (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Official Coal Miners' Memorial for the Commonwealth of Virginia has been accepted

Official Coal Miners' Memorial for the Commonwealth of Virginia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appalachian Arts Center (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appalachian Arts Center (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 04:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Help me!

Please help me with...I resubmitted an article and now I can't find it - I keep getting the original which I completely rewrote and resubmitted...Please help me! I'd really like to get this article accepted so I can move on. Thanks for your kind help!TCVCJ (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

TCVCJ (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Are you talking about Draft:Appalachian Arts Center? If not you can find other pages you've worked on by clicking on the "Contributions" link found in the upper right of every Wikipedia page. The Contributions page will show every edit you've made to Wikipedia. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appalachian Arts Center (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Appalachian Arts Center has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Appalachian Arts Center. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 23:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Back of the Dragon concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Back of the Dragon, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Appalachian Arts Center

Hello, TCVCJ. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Appalachian Arts Center".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.