User talk:Stringy Acid

Hi Stringy Acid.

I noticed that you nominated and the article on Balaji Viswanathan was indeed deleted. So Quora's most followed person (who has more following than even Jimmy Wales) and the top writer's Wikipedia article was eventually deleted. To me now it seems like Wikipedia is no place for the people who are popular on various social media platforms. Now that you have confirmed that, can the articles on PewDiePie or jacksepticeye also be nominated for deletion?, since these people have been covered on Wikipedia only because they are popular YouTubers Of coourse, in good faith. Regards TheodoreIndiana (talk) 14:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Well, the general idea is that if being Quora's most followed person was a notable feat in itself, other secondary sources (e.g., newspapers, reputable blogs, etc.) would have covered Balaji Vishwanathan. Unfortunately, there is no such coverage at the moment (also see WP:TOSOON), which would lead one to conclude that it is not an accomplishment that people are interested in. Jimmy Wales is famous for things other than being on Quora. As you've noted yourself, there are several articles about YouTubers and other social media users on Wikipedia. Your examples, PewDiePie and jacksepticeye, both have received multiple coverage by several secondary sources including Irish Examiner, Forbes, Business Insider, etc. Thus, unlike Balaji Vishwanathan, they pass WP:GNG. Hope the reasons I nominated the article for deletion is now clear. Cheers! — Stringy Acid (talk) 19:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

You have a new message at bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:আলোচনাসভা#Translating_a_Bengali_newspaper_article --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply