User talk:S..Yash

Hello, S..Yash, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 16:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi S..Yash! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ahan Shetty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Karan Deol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 06:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Aryan Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 06:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, I just tagged some or all of your articles for speedy deletion. Please note being the son of a notable person does not make one notable. The person must have independent notability. Thank you – GSS (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Aryan Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 15:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Aryan Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 06:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Your changes are not supported by the existing reference Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Rajat Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Singhpur Gohila Ambedkar Nagar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  sami  ^talk 16:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of AdnanAliAfzal (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 16:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S..Yash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am not disagree with Administractor DoRD, but as I have mentioned before, I alreday admitted that I am abusing multiple accounts. I have also stated all my alternative accounts. Dear administractors, if you want me to do something before unblock me, e.g. to apologize, please state it clearly, thanks S..Yash (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

DoRD didn't block you, I did. I find your request for clarification questionable, since the problems have already been explained to you multiple times across multiple accounts, including User talk:Captain Avenger!. You are not presently welcome to edit at Wikipedia, and any edit you make may be reverted by any user without regard for our edit-warring policy. Your edits have been persistently disruptive, many of them indistinguishable from vandalism, and you are wasting volunteer time. Find a better hobby. As for being unblocked, we never unblock sockpuppet accounts, we would only consider unblocking your first account. So, if you want any admin to consider unblocking you, you'll have to go allll the way back to your first account if you can remember what that was, and request the unblock there. You would also have to list all of your sock accounts, demonstrate some comprehension of why your edits have been problematic, and convince an unblocking admin that you won't continue your disruption. However, based on some of your more recent edits, like the introduction of puffery at Karan Deol that you obviously lifted from other sources (you know, plagiarized) I have strong doubts that you have the appropriate skills and decision-making ability to edit here constructively. You can take the Standard Offer. Come back in six months without any socking or editing of any kind, and then open an unblock request at your first account. Maybe by then you'll understand a little more about why plagiarism and copyright violations are serious academic violations. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To be honest, I don't even know why I was mentioned here. I haven't worked the SPI, and I can't see anywhere that I might have even commented on one of the socks' unblock requests. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

@DoRD: My guess: Trolling, or maybe they copy/pasted a previous unblock request from some ancient account. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

• I'm not an admin, but you probably need to read WP:STANDARDOFFER for any chance. That means you walk away for 6 months - no socking or IP editing at all. You'd then have to request an unblock on your main account and convince an admin that you'll not be disruptive. You've created a fair number of socks, and that will affect your chances. Ravensfire (talk) 19:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:S..Yash. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 01:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removed talk page access. They can flop around on the counter somewhere else. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply