User talk:Riteze

Hello, Riteze, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 08:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Constitution of India, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 15:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Draupadi. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stop vandalising articles with your POV edits as did you to Rama, Hanuman and Kusha (Ramayana). I and many others have already told you that mythology doesn't need to tick the checklist of the rules of science neither it cares about what you think. Information which is clearly stated in the texts and is obvious doesn't need citations but your nonsense claims and POVs do. Now don't change any information without reliable sources and also don't ask citations for the information which is clearly mentioned in the texts just because it doesn't fit right with your nonsense POV. Hbanm (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hbanm If it is clearly mentioned in those texts, please cite those texts. No POV or any rules of any subject are being pushed. Only compliance with Wikipedia's policy that is WP:RS is being asked for. Riteze (talk) 15:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I already told you things which are clearly mentioned in the texts doesn't necessarily need citations, your nonsense claims do. Don't change original information until you have reliable sources for your nonsense claims. Hbanm (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hbanm There are no claims from my side, but only the request for reliable sources for the existing content. And which "texts" are you talking about? Riteze (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have added citation for Kusha (Ramayana), things which are clearly mentioned in orginal texts doesn't necessarily need citations and if you need them so bad, add them yourself instead of asking for them on every article or changing the information according to your POV Hbanm (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

That thing you mentioned in the article Kusha (Ramayana) is not for Lava and Kusha not being sons of Rama, but it is for all the war that took place. Learn english first. Now if you vandalise original information on any article one more time according to your nonsense POV and without any reliable sources you will be reported to administrators for being "vandalism only" account. Hbanm (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hbanm It is you who is vandalizing the articles by repeatedly deleting the cited portions of the texts. You have not read the english correctly, probably due to your biased mindset. Please see carefully, the "story" word is written in the sentence which you are referring to, and "son, father etc." is not written.

And please don't jump on to reverting anyone's edits, specially the cited ones, before discussing it.

On this context, please undo the last change made by you in the said article. Riteze (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes that is for the war story which is told, now you understand? If it was for Lava and Kusha for not being sons of Rama, it would have been written in the start where it is mentioned that they both are sons of Rama. Like this "Lava and Kusha are sons of Rama according to some minor texts but they are not mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana". If you want to insert your POV bring the reliable source wherein it is clearly written that "Lava and Kusha are not mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana". Don't try to sneak in your POV behind your misinterpreted understanding of the citation. Hbanm (talk) 05:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hbanm I never said that Lava and Kusha are not mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana. It is about their story only. The edit in question also mentioned the same thing about story only, nothing about their existence or parentage. Thus, the last version (before reversion) was not incorrect in this sense.

Readers must be aware that the story of war doesn't exist in the Valmiki Ramayana. Therefore, the last version may please be restored by undoing the last reversion. Riteze (talk) 08:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You consider yourself as extremely clever and other people as fools, right? You clearly stated that their "story" is not mentioned in the Ramayana in your edit only to push your stupid POV, but the truth is their "story" is mentioned in the Uttarakhand of Ramayana. There is no mention of any war story in the lead that you are mentioning that this story is not present in Valmiki Ramayana. Regarding the war story in the citation which you are using to push your POV is already mentioned in the article as non-authentic or occuring only in some versions. Hbanm (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Hbanm I left my so called POV, as soon as I found the citation added to the first line. I just wanted to make minimal changes in the existing content to keep the lead as short as possible, since one line of information on someone's birth may not be considered as a story by many. I will undo my edit, even though not necessary. Riteze (talk) 08:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kusha (Ramayana), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athithi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Corrected the link. Riteze (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Kushik. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and I'm not too sure what exactly the article is about or its scope so moving to draft until it's ready. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 08:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze आपसे अनुरोध है की अर्जुन पंचारिया के पेज को हटाने की नीति से चिन्हित किया गया है आप उसको सही बदलाव करे और उसमें सही जानकारी डाले धन्यवाद। Official pur (talk) 10:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur अभी देखा तो पृष्ठ हट चुका है जी। :) Riteze (talk) 11:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

आप अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू पृष्ट को पुनः निर्माण करो इनके बारे में जानकारी आपको गुगल से मिल जायेगी आप नियम और शर्तें का पालन करके सही से पृष्ट का निर्माण करे ।

धन्यवाद। Official pur (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur इस पृष्ठ से विकीपीडिया का कोई अन्य पृष्ठ नही जुडता क्या फायदा ऐसे पृष्ठ का?

और यह अंग्रेजी विकिपीडिया है। आपको इस लिंक पर लिखना चाहिए था। Riteze (talk) 12:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

अच्छा तो आप इस नाम से लेख लिख सकते हो क्या ? Official pur (talk) 13:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

यह पृष्ठ सिंधू गांव के पृष्ट से जुड़ता है। Official pur (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur जो-२ जानकारी पता है, पृष्ठ के ज्ञानसंदूक में भर लो। Riteze (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

देखो मैने कुछ जानकारी डाली है बाकी कुछ आप गुगल का सहारा लो @Riteze Official pur (talk) 15:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

कुछ संदर्भ आप सही से डाले वो चेक करे संदर्भ में @Riteze Official pur (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze अभी इस लेख में हटाने की नीति को लेकर चिन्हित किया गया है उसको आप वापस ले तो आगे में विकिपीडिया के नियमो के मुताबिक बदलाव कर सकू।

कृपया इतना आप अपना आभार दिखाए।

धन्यवाद। Official pur (talk) 06:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze जी आप बस एक सहायता कर दो की यह अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू के पेज में जो हटाने की नीती को लेकर चिन्हित किया गया है उसको वापस सही कर दो ।

आपका सहयोग विकिपीडिया को प्रभावी बनाए में सहयोग है।

धन्यवाद। Official pur (talk) 13:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur hi:सिंधू गांव भी कहीं ना कहीं से लिंक होना चाहिए। Riteze (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze सिंधू गांव आगे कैसे लिंक होगा वो तो गांव का पेज है न और आप अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू के पेज में एसा बदलाव करो की इस पृष्ट को निर्माता के अलावा कोई बदलाव न कर सके। Official pur (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze जी, अभी आप दोबारा चेक करो की hi:अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू पेज भी आगे जुड़ा है और hi:सिंधू गांव का पेज भी आगे जुड़ता है किसी पेज से अब आपसे स:विनय निवेदन है की hi:अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू पेज में से हटाने के द्वारा चिन्हित किया गया वापस ले ।

धन्यवाद। Official pur (talk) 14:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur सिंधू गांव अभी भी किसी पेज से लिंक नही है। Riteze (talk) 15:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

मेने अभी किया था लिंक @Riteze Official pur (talk) 15:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

आप अभी चेक करो की hi: अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू पेज जुड़ा हुआ है आप उसको सही करो कृपया करके।

धन्यवाद। Official pur (talk) 15:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur , hi:नोखा, बीकानेर#गांव Riteze (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze हा, पर अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू वाले पेज में अभी तक हटाने की नीति को सही नही किया गया है । Official pur (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Official pur पहले यहां गांव के नाम का लिंक होना चाहिए। Riteze (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Riteze वो तो आप भी डाल सकते हो ना Official pur (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

अब आप सही से चेक करो और hi:अर्जुन पंचारिया सिंधू के पेज को सही करो ताकि हम सत्यापित जानकारी डाल सके उस पेज पर। @Riteze Official pur (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Panipat Municipal Corporation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Puruṣārtha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krodha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rao Narbir Singh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahipal Dhanda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. NiteshTALK 00:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Nitesh003 The edits as reverted by you on Delhi Legislative Assembly and Lok Sabha were not experimental, but proper edits. Changes were already discussed on the talk page and references/sources were already cited in the mentioned edits. Removal of referenced/sourced content is apparently "non-constructive" on your part. You are expected to revert back the above mentioned destructive changes as done by you on above mentioned pages. Riteze (talk) 03:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about? There is no such thing as non-voting members. Ministers do have voting power, as they are also MPs representing their constituencies. Currently, Parliament is in session—you can watch it for a day or view any old video of a bill being passed to see that ministers also vote in their respective houses. It’s common sense: if ministers didn’t have voting rights, a majority government could become a minority, making it hard to pass bills, motions, etc. NiteshTALK 03:51, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

I didn’t find any citation except Article 88, let alone any discussion. In this case, you also need secondary sources. You interpreted Article 88 wrongly—it doesn’t stop ministers from voting in the house of which they are members. NiteshTALK 04:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Further discussion on talk page of the article. Riteze (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to transclude Template:Infobox Indian Constituency (wd), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop adding this invalid infobox to articles until it is fixed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Have a look at this. You might want to restore the previous version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notice, Fylindfotberserk! Riteze (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Infoboxes need to use Module:WikidataIB, not {{Wikidata}}. That guidance appears in the first line of the latter template's documentation. Please adjust the infoboxes that you are creating. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion. Using {{Wdib}} generates an unlinked entry (in this example, 'State') as compared to linked entry generated using {{wd}}. Forcing it to be linked changes the heading of the Infobox. Riteze (talk) 03:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

You'll have to dig into the code of the template you are wrapping. It looks like you are handing off the |state= value ([[Haryana|Haryana]]) to the switch statement in {{Infobox Indian constituency/defaultdata}}. You can use Special:ExpandTemplates to figure out what is happening. Happy troubleshooting! – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Re this edit, see this RFC. this list of RFCs may also help. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Thank you for your support for the composer, with spring flowers and a songbird (in places)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:15, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

That's beautiful! Music is lovely too! Thanks. Riteze (talk) 09:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome. Regarding the works in the infobox: the neutral way (see Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin ...) is a link to the works list. Someone printing will print the long section about them in the article. They could also print the works list. No reason to load the infobox with many or arbitrary links. Chopin's birthday is today - see my story. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I envision it as a good idea to transclude the List of Compositions as a section on the concerned page. Then the Infobox link may point to that section of the underlying page. It will increase the information contained in the printable version of the page with just minor touchup. Riteze (talk) 10:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggest that on project composers, perhaps. I'm not so sure, - a link seems better to me. Imagine Bach's works in his article, - having to be be uploaded every time someone makes a change to the complete article ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Panipat City Assembly constituency, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop adding wikidata infobox templates to articles when the templates do not comply with the RFC. I have explained this to you many times. This editing pattern is becoming disruptive. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

l tried using {{wdib}}, but implementing this Infobox using wdib is not feasible because wdib doesn't give raw value of a wikidata item.

As far as printing sourced data is concerned, {{Infobox Indian Constituency (wd)}} and {{Constituency representative}}, doesn't print a data which doesn't have a reference in wikidata (because of use of format=%r). You allowed it in another template.

If it still bothers you, I have stopped adding this template to articles.

It was a constructive edit as this template was designed to 'efficiently' update a data which is mentioned in multiple pages. Without this template the job of wikipedia editors shall remain time-consuming when they will have to edit every page which contains an information which has recently changed because of some election or otherwise.

I hope you consider revising your reversion. Riteze 02:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

You posted the above message after updating the template. My message above was valid when I posted it. Claims of saving time, if they contradict a consensus RFC closure, are not valid. You can save editors' time while complying with the RFC. I have provided copious links to help you, and you have been wasting my time with your disruptive addition of these templates to articles.

If you are having trouble getting {{wdib}} to do what you want it to do, try asking at Module talk:WikidataIB. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Though the template was not added to any page other than the one discussed above after updating it to use as much {{Wdib}} as was possible, a request has been placed on Module talk: WikidataIB for implementing an option to get raw value so that it could be used in infoboxes through automatic templates. Riteze 08:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kushik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a plan for Template:MLA table and Template:List mla? Templates that are not used are typically deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kushik".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @SHB2000:, hiwiki has been hijacked by a few users. I was just trying to free it up. I am not sure weather I'll mail you or not, but I might probably keep informing you about their misdeeds. Thanks. Riteze^Talk 15:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

If you give me write access at least to my User namespace on meta, I'll not have to write here which might send you a notification each time I add new info. Riteze^Talk 18:47, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

No – you really need to take a break from hiwiki and not use your user talk page as a venue to complain about hiwiki's misdeeds. You're only going to get yourself blocked on more wikis by continuing here. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

You have disruptevly interfered in the discussion which was aimed at improving administration of a wikipedia, without invitation or complaint from any of the users. Riteze^Talk 03:36, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

That isn't interference. Under that rationale we wouldn't be blocking active editors in the first place. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:16, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

By preventing me from editing my talk page on meta, you are allowing the violation of wmf:UCoC guidelines on hiwiki. Example: m:User talk:Riteze#User संजीव कुमार (continued violation). This may result in degradation of quality of that wiki. Riteze^Talk 15:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sigh...I really don't hope to have to spell everything out step by step but being blocked on a wiki means no editing – which I'm sure you know. That also means you don't use another wiki in an attempt to bypass your block, which you tried to do on Meta-Wiki. It doesn't matter if UCoC violations are there, you don't try and directly interfere, you direct your case to the U4C – but you didn't do that, you decided to use your talk page to continue with hiwiki matters. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I was just trying to give them a chance before filing the case to U4C. Riteze^Talk 15:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

They made it clear they didn't want any further chances. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Indian Constituency (wd) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Incumbent has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Constituency representative has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deputy commissioner of Panipat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Congress of Vedanta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hav Baldev Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Deputy commissioner of Panipat".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Riteze. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hav Baldev Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:MLA table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:List mla has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:List mla (wd) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox legislature (wd) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Get part has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply