User talk:Replayerr

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sultanate of Mogadishu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buzi River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sofala into Sultanate of Mogadishu. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Hubat. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Magherbin (talk) 22:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I've noticed that you left a message in your edit summary on the Werner Munzinger article (which I believe is to be directed at me).[1] I'd like to remind you that whoever added the "Ethiopian Empire" as his deathplace made that edit in 2009[2] and that my edits (nor anyone else in recent times) on that article had nothing to do with that addition. محرر البوق (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Magherbin (talk) 01:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this is @Binglebarry,

I am here to talk to you about your recent edits on Las Qorey. Many of your edits seem to be bias and lack any evidence. My main concern is that your sources have no evidence whatsoever, use improper images without captions, and many fabricated things. Please do not use such sources as they do not fit to be anywhere near credible. Binglebarry (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Shimbra Kure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abyssinians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I really enjoyed learning about Dini Ahmed Abou Baker. Thank you for creating the article. Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reading it! Djiboutian history is relatively understudied which is why I will continue to bring share more historical Djiboutians. Replayerr (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Replayerr! Your additions to Battle of Fatagar have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Find multiple sources stating he is from Maghreb"? Are you kidding? Did you read the article? Is the Maliki school mainly found in east africa or Zeila? Magherbin (talk) 17:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

We have the patrilineal line of Aw Barkhadle and is contradictory to the family tree of Yahya ibn Muhammad [3] .

His first origin is: 'Umar the son of Dunyahwz, the son of Ahmed, the son of Muhammed, the son of Hamid, the son of Mahmud, the son of Shaykh Yusuf and that is Barkhadlah, the son of Muhammed, the son of 'Abdallah, the son of Sa'id, the son of 'Ali, the son of Muhammed, the son of Isma'il, the son of Yahya, the Qureyshite, the Hashimite the descendant of al-Hasan the son of 'Ali the son of Abu 'Talib, may God honour his face - whose grandfather was the Messenger of God, may God‟s favours and peace be upon Him! - Muhammed the son of 'Abdallah, the son of 'Abd al-Muttalib, and the ancestors of His (the Prophet) as far as Adam who are fifty.

The line that I have removed is a fringe theory and should not be included in the article. Replayerr (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The traditions state he was from Arabia meaning he is from outside of Zeila yet the article states he was born in Zeila. This is historically inaccurate and is the actual fringe theory. However I dont have time to go back and forth on this. Take care. Magherbin (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Emirate of Harar, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure Replayerr (talk) 21:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of Dul Madoba, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Read WP:HOUND. I'm not going to contest your claims of fringe theory [4] which may be true I dont know. Following editors around is not appropriate though, this is the second time [5]. Magherbin (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This may have been a coincidence. I have stated multiple problems I have no issues with you at all. Replayerr (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Mahfuz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Which part has been removed? Replayerr (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Mahfuz dominated the political scene since the 1480s,"...etc -- Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

} Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Glockerov (talk) 14:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Glockerov (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Replayerr. Thank you for your work on Henri Lambert (explorer). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why did you remove the victory??? An Egyptian withdrawal is A victory for the rebelling force. and why did you remove the Somaliland part,the territory IS apart of modern Somaliland right? Samyatilius (talk) 16:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

You need a source stipulating that there was an "Isaaq victory". The Khedivate's Somali Coast extended from Djibouti to modern-day Cape Guardafui so it would be nonsensical to say it was only "modern-day Somaliland". The Egyptians did not withdraw because of the Berbera uprising but because of the Mahdists in 1884. Replayerr (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

The khedivate never went past Berbera,that claim has 0 sources,after the rebellion,the Egyptians left Berbera,which clearly gave the isaaqs a victory the egyptians also withdrew to zeila before completely abandoning it in 1884,the uprising happened only in Berbera,so it was infact modern Somaliland,please refrain from making baseless sources,i have seen you have been reported multiple times for vandalism,this seems like a habit of you going around making biased interpretations of Samyatilius (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Actually according to Khedivate claims that were recognised by Great Britain on the Somali coast.

The second part of the memorandum opens with an account of events which preceded the signing in 1877 of the Somali Coast Convention by the British Government and by the Egyptian Khedive, describing the Khedive's attempts to extend the limit of proposed Egyptian sovereignty as far south as the Juba River, and subsequent British threats to enter into agreements with Somali chiefs independently of the Khedive.[6]

The Khedivate went into conflict with the Sultan of Zanzibar and his kingdom over the ports of Kismayo and Barawe as mentioned below:

For some years before the Mahdist revolt the whole of the North Somali coastlands as far as Cape Hafun, below Cape Guardafui, on the east side, had been included in the Khedival possessions. Berbera, Zeila, and for a time even Harrar were held by Egyptian garrisons, the Egyptian flag floated over several other stations along the seaboard, and in 1875 Egyptian troops had even occupied the coast towns of Brava and Kismayo, belonging to the Sultan of Zanzibar. But the schemes of conquest indicated by these movements were suddenly arrested by the Mahdi's rebellion, which obliged Egypt to withdraw her forces from all her outlying possessions on the north-east African seaboard. [7]

I cite my sources however regarding the source you used in the Berbera uprising , it doesn't even mention the death of Egyptian governor nor does it mention it as an "Isaaq victory/Isaaq uprising" or even a revolt but led to unrest.

If you want to take this case up to the administrators instead of discussing in the talk page as I put forward. I have no issues. Replayerr (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Have you even read the source i have used for this book? It legit talks about the success of the uprising and the killing of the governor,as for your own sources,the khedive exercised limited authority past Berbera and Hargeisa,and hos southwestern portions were almost quickly lost.

I apologize for my irrational behavior tho Samyatilius (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your article heavily relies on a single source and requires multiple, could you give me the pages which I could see where this killing is mentioned? Replayerr (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

The south-western portions weren't quickly lost either, they withdrew due to the Mahdists as I've shared already and marked in bold. Replayerr (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

There is barely any sources claiming that zanzibaris had control of the ports of kismayo and barawa,infact they once paid The Geledi Sultanate tribute. Jahahaiaia (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

" Tell English people Egyptians , with four ships and 400 soldiers and guns , have without notice seized and occupied north of Zanzibar dominions , taken down my flag at Brâwa and Kismayo , seized the forts , and disarmed my troops" [8]

There are multiple sources that discuss about Zanzibari troops being present in these port towns although this caused the Geledi sultan to ban them from trading in the interior. Sultan Ahmed Yusuf of the Geledi had barred all Zanzibari officials from visiting his territory as his price for assisting Barghash to construct the garesa in Muqdisho. [9] Replayerr (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

I request you stop vandalizing pages or else your account might be reported once again. Samyatilius (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

I am not vandalising the pages, please refer to Wikipedia:Assume good faith Replayerr (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Issa Ughazate, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Taabii (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Djibouti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aussa and Oromo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

I just reported 198.30.252.248 (talk · contribs) to AIV rpt for 198.30.252.248 for the same as 75.118.24.24 (talk · contribs). EvergreenFir quickly "blocked for six months for block evasion". How long before the anon is back? Cheers Adakiko (talk)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Take note that you are required to add the above notice to the talk page of whoever it is that you are dragging to ANI so that they are aware of and therefore able to participate in whatever discussion occurs there. I’ve done that for you this time, but in the future admins may refuse to take action on whatever issue raised there if the above notice is not added to the relevant talk page(s). TomStar81 (Talk) 17:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:09, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Egyptians occupied the entire somali coast from ziela aswell as berbera and numourous other settlements not just Ziela. Sha19999 (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Share sources that it had conquered the Isaaq Sultanate. I can share multiple claims that Berbera to Zeila was considered Ottoman territory in both parliamentary papers and firmans in the Sublime Porte. Egyptians offered tribute in-order to annex the territory. Replayerr (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

share sources that it had conquerd ottoman ziela you wont find any Sha19999 (talk) 10:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I included various sources and refrain from attacking fellow editors. Replayerr (talk) 16:13, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

i havent attacked you i said you wont find any sources you told me to share sources can you stop making unnecessary accusations against me Sha19999 (talk) 16:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

You made a claim that I did not find any but included multiple in the article. Replayerr (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

ok Sha19999 (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

ive seen it now nice work Sha19999 (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

you rmeoved a section that is well-referenced in your edit (withou an edit summary). I have reinstated the edit but want to hear your side. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:20, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

It was snatched from the article I wrote regarding Olol Dinle by copying and pasting with no new insight. Most historian scholars agree that the sultanate had been destroyed when other Somali tribes rebelled and overthrew it. Replayerr (talk) 16:35, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@FuzzyMagma The sources cited do not refer to the Ajuran state surviving/lingering on. Replayerr (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for merging this page, but please remember to blank and redirect the source page once you're done. I spent a few minutes trying to perform the merge before I realized it had already been performed by you.

You can install this script to easily redirect the pages. FaviFake (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, I see you cited this book on Dankali Sultanate, do you have a soft copy of the book by any chance? Magherbin (talk) 07:04, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Magherbin I don't have a soft-copy of the book but I have the original manuscript in Arabic. Replayerr (talk) 00:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ok was looking for the English translation especially the analysis. Magherbin (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Donzel's works are hard to come by online. You can only get hard-copies. Replayerr (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The argument that modern Hararis are part of an Eastern Gurage continuum, rather than a distinct Harla offshoot, is supported by compelling linguistic, historical, and cultural evidence. Linguistic studies, notably by Wolf Leslau, demonstrate that Harari shares a close relationship with Eastern Gurage languages (Silt'e, Wolane, Zay), featuring a common Ethio-Semitic structure and Sidama substratum, consistent with a shared Hadiyya origin rather than a separate Harla lineage.

Historical records, including the Chronicles of Negus Baeda Maryam and Emperor Galawdewos’s chronicle, document the Adare (ancestors of both Harari and Eastern Gurage) fleeing Oromo invasions around 1540-1550, with oral traditions and genealogies tracing to figures like Abadir further corroborating this unified dispersal. In contrast, the Harla theory lacks textual evidence of a Harla language, relying instead on vague archaeological sites and secondary sources from Futuh al-Habasha, with no linguistic continuity to support a direct link to Harari, while the late-dated Kitāb al-Farā’id (16th-17th century) undermines claims of a pre-existing Harla identity in Harar.

Thus, the Eastern Gurage continuum provides a robust, evidence-based narrative of migration and evolution, outstripping the speculative Harla hypothesis. ~2025-34224-28 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) 100% on GPT zero. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 20:36, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply