User talk:RandomEditor6772314

Hi RandomEditor6772314! I noticed your contributions to Sexual selection and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

[...] [Deleted by host because it's old now, and to clear space on Talk page]

Happy editing! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, are you using AI chatbots for your editing? If so, you should read through the information at Wikipedia:Artificial intelligence resources. If not, no problem. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 03:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Absolutely NOT, not in any way whatsoever, NEVER have I used one (in any site, or for any purpose, ever). "Chatbots", "AI", and LLMs, are garbage mass-theft machines. The output is garbage, and the theft ("training" data) is an unethical scam and disgrace.

As a side note: I want to point out that if my editing or comments "looks like a chatbot", well, we're getting into really unpleasant waters since I am probably one of the most militantly anti-AI people you would ever meet. In other words, we both now know that you thought/suspected a 100% human (absolutely 0% AI whatsoever) looked like AI, so, uh... the paranoia is only going to worse in the future.

Now I want to ask you what bland(? tedious(?) fluffy(?) low-substance(?) thing I wrote that made you think it was AI. But instead of asking that, I'll just say: I definitely have way more energy and interest in writing/criticizing/examining crap on the internet than most people, exhaustively, so I assume it was something about that vibe that made you think "AI". But no, I'm the real thing: wordy human. (And I've usually used a dry tone, I guess, in wiki writing?) RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

You just happen to have a writing style similar to chatbots. You use lots of bold, often write really long edit summaries, and in some cases you have accidentally used *Markdown* for italics. All of these are things typical of AI chatbots. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 21:57, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I bold some of the words I think are most important, for people "perusing" and the kind of people who complain about "a lot of words" (etc). If their eyeballs only see one thing, or need sign-posting, well.

Accidental markdown... I've typed a ton of comments on reddit, and (relatively) few on wikipedia.

Long edit summaries, personally I dislike short summaries, I want to be able to get a picture of what someone actually did in the text, and see the posture (so to speak), without having to scroll/parse through the 'diff'. Especially with how incompetent and deceitful many wiki users are.

I think you should be using things like 1) slop fluff phrasing and empty cliches 2) comments that are basically *exactly like* some other comment 3) account history (etc) as the big clues, rather than bold or markdown mistakes. RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 22:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I usually write long edit summaries as well. Sorry for the inconvenience! SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Rihanna, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:27, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I referred to people's comments and arguments, not to themselves or to their person (which is the definition of "personal attack").

A personal attack does not mean a critical comment toward a person about their public comments and arguments. "Comment on content, not on other contributors or people" is exactly what I did. I think you might be confused about the nature of "Reply" which has to be directed to a person, though I was clearly talking about and criticizing the flawed logic in posted words/comments?

RandomEditor6772314 (talk) RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Now you're accusing other editors of being racist. Final final warning now. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:16, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I only saw your edits from the Rihanna talk page, but it is clear you are passionate about editing and getting things right. However, I noticed that you are mostly focused on policy and talk pages. I suggest you focus more on working on articles, and find projects that inspire you, rather than getting into contentious discussions on talk pages (that you might not know much about). I know that my time on this project feels much more productive when I am expanding articles. Feel free to revert or remove this if you want to ignore my advice. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RandomEditor6772314. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:10, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @RandomEditor6772314, I highly recommend that you participate in the ANI discussion, you have every right to be involved in a discussion about your editing and any possible sanctions that may arise as a result.

If you don't join in, then decisions will be made without you having any say in what happens to your own account. Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1989 Jamba Lockheed Hercules crash, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:06, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Money Jungle, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Wood was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Max Roach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Lees, Gene (1960-08-18). "Newport the Trouble" (PDF). Downbeat. Vol. 27, no. 17 (PDF). {{cite news}}: Check |archive-url= value (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:03, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Charles Mingus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Lees, Gene (1960-08-18). "Newport the Trouble" (PDF). Downbeat. Vol. 27, no. 17 (PDF). {{cite news}}: Check |archive-url= value (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RandomEditor6772314 incivility. Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:46, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand. The link doesn't show me any discussion or issue about me. I also CTRL F'ed on that page for my username, to make sure I'm not missing anything. Can you give a specific link to what the...charges (feels weird to say that) were or the specific discussion?

Also the policy page list of Incivility examples is nothing like anything I have ever done or said on wikipedia. Did a person claim that because I attacked an argument or say that it was "rude" to explain why a statement is false. I've certainly done that many times. I don't get it, and I don't see any info.

Also a ban of a few hours(?) doesn't fit with what I'm seeing on the Incivility policy list behavior examples. RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 00:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:59, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in The Odyssey (2026 film). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 15:43, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

It appears that you have been canvassing—notifying a biased selection of users of an ongoing community discussion about Talk:The Odyssey (2026 film)—which may undermine Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building. While helpful notices are allowed, they should be limited, nonpartisan, and neutral. They should not be spammed, support one point of view or side of a debate, or be selectively sent to those who may agree with you. Thank you. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 18:54, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I clearly explained all the reasons why that wasn't Canvassing, and also how the person I asked *had already gone on record as supporting YOUR position (they took paragraph text for granted)*. This is really clear from a basic check of the exchange, and what they said, and the fact that it was only one, and the fact that they were obviously base-line qualified to have some concept of Readability/usefulness. The fact that you've framed that as canvassing suggests that your position is not about Readability. RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Eric Dolphy

added a link pointing to Candid

Kenny Dorham

added a link pointing to Candid

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albanian iso-polyphony, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ison was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diarra Kilpatrick, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Climb was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello I'm Mustbeotherwise. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Some of your recent edits to the article Diarra Kilpatrick feel like they may not be neutral. Even when cited from a reliable source, quotes like her presence was so invigorating that it almost cured flaws in the script are generally discouraged as they can cause an imbalance in how the subject is presented. I am planning on going through the article and removing potentially promotional language. If you have any questions, please let me know. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 19:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Rescinded. Inappropriate warn. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 02:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For taking the time to explain to me why my edit was awful. Thank you! - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 02:20, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

H4 (film)

added links pointing to Alphaville and Amazon

Jeryl Prescott

added links pointing to Hawthorne and Game of Silence

Diarra Kilpatrick

added a link pointing to Decider

Mosaic Youth Theatre of Detroit

added a link pointing to ABC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Harry Lennix, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Editors (2014-10-23). "Chicago Humanities Festival to Premiere New Footage of Roger Ebert in "Life Itself"". RogerEbert.com. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jeryl Prescott

added links pointing to Hawthorne and Game of Silence

Harry Lennix

added a link pointing to Broadway

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply