User talk:ProjectAutomate

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SpragueThomson was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Area 27 Motorsports Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SpragueThomson^talk 18:25, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, ProjectAutomate! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SpragueThomsontalk 18:25, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Area 27 Motorsports Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahaml35 (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Area 27 Motorsports Park. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. MediaKyle (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Area 27 Motorsports Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robot, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Analogue was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rotary actuator, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cams was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gnomingstuff, sorry about that. I'm a mechanical engineer and was trying to update the page for technical clarity and fix some of the dead links, but I clearly used a tool that messed up the formatting and added that 'AE motor' tag which was a mistake. I'll stick to manual, smaller edits in the future. Thanks for the catch ProjectAutomate (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Pattersonuwu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Post-quantum cryptography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I would also like to reiterate that edits generated by large language models are not allowed on Wikipedia (not accusing you of using AI for this edit specifically, just in general) pattersonuwu ^njz (talk) 06:55, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Heyo, I saw you added sources to the first paragraph of that section, however mentioning the Bitcoin Quantum Index without a reliable secondary source isn't ideal and as a result I have removed it because I don't believe it to be notable. The second paragraph is also unsourced, but I haven't removed it as I believe you can find a source for that statement. Please do that by the way... Thank you! pattersonuwu ^njz (talk) 03:38, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply