User talk:OfficialURL

Hi! Please consider changing your signature to comply with MOS:CONTRAST and WP:SIGAPP. It appears your signature has a fragment of 1, which fails the requirements of WCAG (One of these colors is shown here). Thanks for your time and complicance in this matter. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've toned it down. All the colors should be compliant with AA under any common background on Wikipedia. Thanks for informing me on the issue. – OfficialURL (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Signatures#Guidelines_and_policies states that A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username. Please comply with that guideline. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 22:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@J947: My signature is just my username stylized. Isn't it already pretty recognizable? – OfficialURL (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

• For some reason all I see is the colours and the talk link. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 23:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @J947: Apparently this was a browser compatibility problem. I've changed my signature a bit. It should work on all major browsers, while still retaining AA compatibility from earlier on this thread. – OfficialURL (talk) 00:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Thanks, that works for me now. :) — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 02:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have an animation of a disphenoid being snub, I hope you're interested in the file. Where can I send a file to you? The unknown player (talk) 03:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, when you add new images to articles, please check how your change affects the page layout. Your innocuous introduction of STL models to Rhombicuboctahedron and Rhombicosidodecahedron turned out to be surprisingly destructive. Please also check if this happened to you in other articles. (In Compound of five cubes you added it below the box. That works.)
In any case, 3D models are not very useful as thumbnails on a page. In articles where space for images is rare, they should instead be linked under the introductory image in the box. (Just like animations.) Greetings, Watchduck (quack) 01:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. I might have gotten too used to editing the stub articles for the uniforms. Should've been more careful with space in this case. I'll see how I can add them as links if I find time for it. – OfficialURL (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I am curious why you removed the parentheses around some of the sentences in your latest edits of Normal space. These were really parenthetical remarks, in the sense that they did not add anything to the understanding of the corresponding paragraph, but were just adding extra optional information. Also, by removing the parentheses around In fancier terms, disjoint closed sets ... you make it seeem that that sentence is a reformulation of the previous one In fact, we can take the values ..., but in fact it is not. It refers to the sentence before that, and should be moved accordingly. Anyway, why are these parentheses bothering you? Regards. PatrickR2 (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sorry for the late reply. I thought it was a bit cumbersome to have such long expressions parenthesized. But it's really no big deal one way or the other. – viiii (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! You talked to me a long time ago. I haven't been looking at polyhedra for a long time. But the last few weeks I have been playing around a little with them again. The result can be found on https://github.com/mtkos/uniform. It is only about non-snub star polyhedra

This some pretty cool stuff. Sorry I'm only seeing it now. – viiii (talk) 01:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have done the snub ones also now: https://github.com/mtkos/snub (as yet without duals) Mennotk (talk) 15:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply