User talk:NineTimes

Hi there, re: this, your cast reordering justified as "more senior" in your edit summary is not constructive. We don't go by subjective opinions about seniority within the Indian film industry. Please don't make arbitrary changes like this. See also WP:FILMCAST instructions. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please don't arbitrarily reorder cast as you did again here. It would also be appreciated if you'd please use edit summaries when making changes, so other editors understand the rationale for your edits. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is regarding an edit you had made on the Konkani Muslims page. We have been speaking, reading and writing Urdu since generations so as to communicate with other Indian Muslim communities (who had settled in Mumbai in the 19th century) and to overcome centuries of relative geographic isolation (the Western Ghats provided isolation from Deccan cultural influence). There is research available online regarding this. Moreover, the register of Hindustani language (or Hindi-Urdu) spoken today in urban Konkani Muslims' homes is largely Urdu instead of Hindi, mainly due to contact with North-Indian Muslim communities. In light of this, I request you to please explain your claim "Konkanis don't speak urdu". Thank you. Mohsin Dalvi 22:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohsindalvi18031987 (talk • contribs)

First of all, "we" part doesn't work on Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if you are a Konkani Muslim yourself or not. Personal POVs don't matter on Wikipedia. Secondly, I am sure they speak Urdu, they also speak Hindi, Kannada, Gujarati etc. But their first language is Konkani or Marathi. Konkani Muslims are natives of Konkan, not migrants from north India or any place outside of India. Their first language is Konkani, not Urdu or any other language. Also saying that urban KMs only speak Urdu and not Hindi is a little far-fetched. They do speak Hindi or other languages spoken by other non-Muslim people in their locality. Do not link language with religion, Urdu as the lingua franca of all Muslims is a myth. Even all north Indian Muslims don't speak Urdu rather they speak Hindi or other common dialects, like Awadhi, Bhojpuri, Khari boli etc. Saying that a Muslim doesn't speak Hindi but only Urdu is seriously laughable. NineTimes (talk) 11:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:NineTimes reported by User:Cpt.a.haddock (Result: ). Thank you. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 14:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've blocked you for 24 hours for edit warring, per the above report. Saying "go ahead and block me" is not helpful; plus a dispute over somebody's nationality or ethnicity isn't a constructive use of time. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! NineTimes, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, re: this edit, while I don't disagree at your removal of a budget value that's labeled with a little skepticism, we don't typically wait for confirmation by filmmakers as you said in your edit summary, as filmmakers are primary sources, and are inherently untrustworthy. For instance, producers of Kabali released exaggerated gross figures in an effort to drum up more patronage, because who doesn't want to be riding the juggernaut as it crushes through town? Producers might downplay the budget to make the spread between budget and gross seem more profitable, etc. Occasionally we might care what a producer says, I think the producers of Dangal at one point might've downplayed media hype that the film crossed ₹2000 crore, which is uniquely non-self-promotional. So, tl;dr, we care what independent sources arrive at. We don't regurgitate what producers say. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, re: [1], though you obviously meant well, the Wikipedia community prefers that we not add Indic script to the lead per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT and that we not even include Indic script in infoboxes per consensus established at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 64#RfC on Indicscript in infoboxes. I personally think it's shortsighted to prohibit Indic scripts from the infobox, because sometimes it's helpful to search for references based on the native name, but the community has already decided... Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per Ammarpad and our guideline WP:CRYSTALBALL there is simply insufficient coverage to warrant an article until the movie is released. Please wait; if you persistently tendentiously resubmit, the article may be nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:October (2018 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Aksar 2 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply