User talk:Nextgensoftwarehub

Hello, Nextgensoftwarehub, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Nextgensoftwarehub, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Nextgensoftwarehub, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Bishonen | tålk 08:32, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nextgensoftwarehub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

AnujB_923 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were considered promotional. I will no longer add content promoting my business or organization. If unblocked, I intend to make neutral and verifiable contributions related to software, education, and technology. I have not received compensation for these contributions. Nextgensoftwarehub (talk) 08:41, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Hi there! Unfortunately, we have not heard from you in a while, so I am declining this stale unblock request. If you would like to return to editing in the future, you may open a new request. If you choose to do so, please respond to the questions below. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:08, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nextgensoftwarehub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I believe my account was blocked in error because my contributions were factual and neutral. I will continue to make constructive edits. Nextgensoftwarehub (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Please open only one unblock request at a time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new comments at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" at the top of the page and not "reply". The reply function is imperfect and doesn't work well in every situation(it does not always work when posting at the bottom).

You have two requests open when only one is needed; they are also contradictory- your first request saying that you understand your edits were promotional and then you make a new request saying that they weren't promotional. Which is it? 331dot (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! In addition to the two unblock requests seeming contradictory, I'm also noting contradictions in your first edit request. That is, you first state, I will no longer add content promoting my business or organization (emphasis added), then state, I have not received compensation for these contributions. Please note that Wikipedia's payment disclosure policy applies regardless of whether you've been specifically paid to edit Wikipedia. If you are editing about a business you own or are employed by, you qualify as a paid editor. As such, please review Wikipedia's payment disclosure policy and conflict of interest guideline. Once you have done so, please explain in your own words how you would abide by these if unblocked. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply