User talk:Nedabrams

Hello, Nedabrams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 23:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

"long past proving his High School teachers wrong" - no. See WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Diddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DJ Diddy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Nedabrams! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 03:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on DJ Diddy Official, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Top Tier (clothing) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Newslinger talk 13:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on DJ Diddy Official, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 98.213.51.34 (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at DJ Diddy Official. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:02, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jauerback: can you please take a look at user TaylorJones44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who reappeared today and created the same article and user Benfranklinkunal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who was registered today and created Draft:DJ Diddy Official. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 15:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@GSS: I've deleted and protected DJ Diddy Official from recreation. You can file an WP:SPI report on the users, if you choose. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:32, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jauerback: Already done Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TaylorJones44. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

GSS see this Praxidicae (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

This is absolutely crazy. This community is horrible and unprofessional and I want to talk to an upper management position on Wikipedia. I have done nothing but show respect and courtesy towards my rejections and I'm labeled as a sock puppet! This is a free encyclopedia, meaning anybody can post well sourced material about a notable topic. Which I failed to do once, with Top Tier Clothing. I have taken the liberty and time out of my day to see extremely famous people going down my Instagram feed, and write Articles about them for Wikipedia out of the good of my heart and you have absolutely killed my spirit and faith in this website. I'm beyond disappointed in the negativity and hate I've gotten from these editors who's pages look like absolute trolls. These guys literally have "I want to make people's lives miserable" in their bio, while I am just a new Wikipedia creator trying to get into the swing of things. I will not stand for being banned on Wikipedia, as I do enjoy this community and making edits on posts, and hope to write an article one day that meets the standards of fellow creators. I am an active community member and have been contributing since I arrived. Unblock me immediately, or lets escalate this into further levels of Wikipedia.

Just a friendly note, historically, threatening people has never really gotten anyone anywhere, including threatening editors with going to non-existent management. Praxidicae (talk) 13:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply