User talk:Medscrib

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Easypod Autoinjector and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia🎄/tlk 05:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Medscrib, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia🎄/tlk 05:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Easypod Autoinjector, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KSFT^C 02:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

,

Hi, there.

This morning I received a message that a page that I had been working on for months and that was approved with a C grade was speedily deleted with no review. Not sure where to turn, as I can't access the page content at all, and the administrator has not included a contest button and doesn't seem to participate in "Talk".

Any advice would be appreciated.

Medscrib (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Purest_advertisement_you_will_find_in_Wikipedia Andy Dingley (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Medscrib, If you go to the deleted page here, you will see the "signature" of the admin who deleted the article, with a link to their talk page. The best thing to do is to go the Talk page of that admin (which is here), and ask if the admin will undelete the article and move it to draft space so you can work on it more. They might say no, but that should be your first stop. if that fails, go to WP:REFUND and make a formal request for undeletion, and the community may decide to undelete it. If you need help with any of that, you can reply here and I'll help you.

If you would like my thoughts as to why I nominated it for speedy, i would be happy to discuss that with you. Jytdog (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, please [Jytdog]. I've requested that on the talk page of User_talk:JamesBWatson as recommended by [Andy Dingley]. Let's please move the discussion over to that page. It's a bit confusing to me that you're using two different Wikipedia accounts. Makes it difficult to follow the proper protocol. Medscrib (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

He isn't using two accounts. -Roxy the dog™ woof 18:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

My mistake. JamesBWatson has two talk pages, which led me to some confusion, and there was no link to this Wikipedia Talk page from the talk notice I received about the deletion. There is now some discussion happening on JamesBWatson's first talk page. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so unclear on how this speedy deletion process works. One person nominates? One approves? And then it's gone? Medscrib (talk) 19:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kind of yes. Anyone can tag an article for speedy deletion but only an administrator can actually delete the article. Regular users cannot delete articles. But yes, it takes 2 people. Jytdog (talk) 20:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Please add your specific concerns about content in the article to User_talk:JamesBWatson. You've used strong language: "The purest advertisement you will see in Wikipedia." From my perspective, I was presenting the information in a straightforward and factual manner (despite the lower case e's). If I've used promotional language, please provide a clear indication of where that is in the article (now that it's been deleted I can't even see it). Medscrib (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of an article that has been approved and rated as C-class by someone other than a sole contributor seems quite inappropriate in principle. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 06:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

well lots of things seem X; you didn't see it, i take it. it looked a lot like stuff you find here. It was jarringly brochure-ish. Jytdog (talk) 06:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Easypod Autoinjector with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry. I was going too quickly, and I shouldn't have done that. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Medscrib. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Easypod Autoinjector".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply