User talk:Max Qaly

Hello, Max Qaly, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Lars Bergström (philosopher), Max Qaly!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A decent start. It could use a couple more sources if they can be found.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere 07:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Max Qaly,

Thank you for creating Anna Seim.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 06:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Economic Theory Bulletin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Max Qaly. Thank you for your work on Top Five Journals in Economics. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I do not understand the point of this stub. It says these are the top 5, then says that is irrelevant!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Max Qaly. Thank you for your work on Top Five Journals in Economics. Another editor, TheBirdsShedTears, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Is the title Top Five Journals in Economics based on the name of a publication that discusses the top five journals, or is it a list of the top five journals in economics?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheBirdsShedTears}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article Top Five Journals in Economics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub based on a single article and a summary of that same article. No indication that this goes beyond that one article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

- MmeMaigret (talk) 16:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply