User talk:LumenStoneEditor

Note: I previously edited under the username FAA HIMS Program; renamed to avoid confusion. I am editing with neutral intent using independent reliable sources.

Hello, FAA HIMS Program. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Human Intervention Motivation Study (HIMS), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 09:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notice. To clarify, I do not have any financial, professional, or personal connection to the FAA, ALPA, or the HIMS program. My interest is purely editorial. I am developing the draft using independent, reliable sources (e.g. National Academies, DOT OIG, court rulings, and mainstream reporting) with the intent of presenting a balanced, neutral article. I will also request a username change to avoid any impression of affiliation. FAA HIMS Program (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I am curious how you came to edit about this topic- it doesn't seem like the type of topic that someone would randomly choose to edit about. If you're not affiliated with it, why did you choose it as your username? 331dot (talk) 08:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi 331dot, thanks for the question. I understand the concern. I am not affiliated in any way with the FAA, ALPA, or the HIMS program. My interest in the topic comes from following aviation safety and occupational health issues more broadly, and I thought the program merited a balanced article since it is referenced in National Academies reports, DOT OIG audits, and federal case law.

I now realize that choosing a username identical to the subject was a mistake, as it creates the wrong impression. I've already requested a rename to a neutral, personal-style username to avoid any confusion. My only intent is to contribute neutral, verifiable content based on reliable sources. I look forward to improving the draft further with balanced sourcing.

LumenStoneEditor (talk) 06:54, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The above exchange seems to be AI generated. Can you explain in your own words what connection you have to the HIMS program and how you came to want to edit on this topic? EducatedRedneck (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi EducatedRedneck. I'm a pilot (and have an interest in Air Traffic Control as well) -- that's how I came to the topic. There was no Wikipedia article for the HIMS program despite it being covered by the National Academies, federal courts, and Congress, so I started one. I'm not paid to edit and don't work for the FAA or ALPA. The earlier replies here were 'stiff' (I guess that's how they came across?) because I was trying to get my account unblocked and didn't want to say the wrong thing. I also responded to your Delta/United concerns on your talk page. Thank you. LumenStoneEditor (talk) 03:18, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "FAA HIMS Program", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies shared use and it is promotional. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 09:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

• The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
  • You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
• The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means it is available.

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Agent VII was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Human Intervention Motivation Study and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Agent 007 (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, FAA HIMS Program! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Agent 007 (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LumenStoneEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

RiverstoneEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I would like to continue contributing under a personal-style username. I understand my current username may appear to represent an organization. I am not affiliated with the FAA or the HIMS program. I only intend to make neutral, well-sourced contributions. Thank you. FAA HIMS Program (talk) 00:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Duplicate request; only one open request is needed; it is possible to edit an existing request, no need to make a new one. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LumenStoneEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

LumenStoneEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Apologies for the earlier name conflict. Requesting unblock and rename under this available personal-style username. I am not affiliated with the FAA or the HIMS program. My intent is to make neutral, well-sourced contributions. Thank you. FAA HIMS Program (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Renamed. 331dot (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm EducatedRedneck. An edit that you recently made to Delta Airlines seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EducatedRedneck (talk) 02:29, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Human Intervention Motivation Study. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GarciaH1978 (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to HIMS Aviation Medical Examiner. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GarciaH1978 (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Human Intervention Motivation Study indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

BTW I moved your reply to User talk:GarciaH1978 since that's where the discussion is. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:20, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Headbomb: No connection. I have no relationship with GarciaH1978 on/off Wikipedia, and before the April 9 draftification I had never (to my knowledge) interacted with that editor. On the moved discussion: the message I left on your talk page ("HIMS article(s): AfC route") wasn't a reply to the Garcia thread, it was a standalone note to you accepting the AfC route, acknowledging your February cleanup of the SCIRP citation, and asking whether you had any specific sourcing or content concerns on the three (now) drafts I could address immediately. Happy for it to live wherever it's most useful -- just wanted to flag that, as it was directed to you, rather than part of the Garcia discussion. Thank you again. LumenStoneEditor (talk) 06:28, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I had reverted this section for a reason. I confused both your accounts, and thought GarciaH was the submitter of your drafts. This was a pure brainfart on my part, and once I realized it, my question no longer had any purpose, or made any sense. My bad entirely. Anyway. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

This is somewhere between an essay and a parti pris projection, clearly written with considerable AI assistance.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Legal challenges to the Human Intervention Motivation Study to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See other declines. There appears to be an agenda being pushed here.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:HIMS Aviation Medical Examiner to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Part three of a series of agenda framing AI submissions.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Human Intervention Motivation Study to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm ChrysGalley. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There are three LLM assisted long articles. Add the three drafts together and a quite specific point of view is being pushed. This is not what Wikipedia does. ChrysGalley (talk) 07:44, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Fries NTAS 2024 HIMS mental health poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Mattdaviesfsic, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

I'm not convinced that the concerns of the previous reviewer have been addressed. I'm not great at knowing if it is or isn't, but some 29 Em dashes in the article don't satisfy me enough. An AI detector says only 30%, but am not sure how accurate an estimate that may be.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Legal challenges to the Human Intervention Motivation Study to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. Talk to me. 06:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking the time. Your em dash count is right, and I'm reworking that prose. On the detector, I don't think those scores are reliable enough in either direction to argue about, so I won't; but I understand the skepticism. I'm going back through the draft against the underlying court documents (as there have been ongoing developments) and will resubmit once that's done rather than now. If anything specific in the content or sourcing struck you as 'off,' I'd be glad to hear it. LumenStoneEditor (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply