User talk:Licory

o_O

{{helpme}} I added hebrew text to erusin#In the Hebrew Bible and it appears messed up. How do I fix it?--Licory (talk) 16:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

With a left-to-right mark, ‎, as I have done. Algebraist 16:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you ! :) Licory (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Not all of that stuff that you removed was from NewmanLuke. I worked long and hard to fix that article up, and you could have at least discussed it before erasing everything. I might add that you removed perfectly good references that I added, for no reason that I can think of.Mzk1 (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please join the discussion which followed your edits to Erusin at Talk:Erusin#Recent_changes_to_Erusin. I do agree with the previous editor that discussing might have been a good idea before making such extensive edits. But anyway, since we are already post factum, let's talk about it. Debresser (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Licory,

I think that the undue weight of the POV accounts came from the fact that originally there was very little information available about the passengers POV. Now that more info from RS has come out perhaps this section should be changed to have less personal accounts. Maybe start a new section of the discussion and reword this section. Zuchinni one (talk) 18:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Zuchinni one, I agree with you. The changes I did were for the very same purpose that you descibed ("this section should be changed to have less personal accounts"), thank you for describing it in such a clear manner.
As long as the section about accounts includes information that doesn't appear in quotations, I think it's acceptable if supported by reliable sources. The quotations were, in my opinion, violating the basis of the NPOV policy. I didn't quite understand your suggestion, though. Do you suggest making a whole new section discussing the different POVs? Regards, --Licory (talk) 19:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply