User talk:Kroach2
Hi Kroach2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contr
Kroach2, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Kroach2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC) |
August 2015
Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bill of attainder because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 12:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for creating the article, but I believe that the topic is better covered on one of Wikipedia's sister projects, Wiktionary. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; it offers in-depth coverage on topics of all branches of human knowledge; Wiktionary is a dictionary; it defines words and phrases.
Looking at the article, it is not likely to expand beyond a definition and an etymology. Since, as a result of the fundamental difference, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, I believe that it should be covered on Wiktionary instead.
Your topic is already covered on Wiktionary, so it's only a matter of merging new information that you have given in the article. If you don't object, then I will transfer the content and soft redirect the page to Wiktionary.
If you have any questions or would like to object to transfer, don't hesitate to reply here. Thanks, Esquivalience t 21:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm KSFT. I noticed that you recently removed some content from General Welfare clause with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KSFTC 17:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Cut-and-paste move of General welfare clause
Hi. Please do not make a cut-and-paste move. This disassociates the edit history from the article, which is a violation of our terms of service. If you wish to move a page to a different title, use the procedures at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Cheers! bd2412 T 17:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.