User talk:Kinou

30+days archive

I have nominated Source mapping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ThaddeusB (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The best course of action is to make the necessary report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, giving details why you think they are a sockpuppet. that way if it turns out that they are and then continue to create more the possibility of the IP being blocked can be looked at. Do you have a link to where they made the legal threat. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 05:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes, the small communities. That's probably not a problem. If the articles are about a community, that is some people live there, then it should be OK. I notice from the source on a couple that there is no indication if any people do live there. But of course not having people there may be OK. Search for "Lake Kawaupaka" and scroll down from there for Dr. Blofeld's contributions. He creates those so quickly that there is the occasional complaint. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 05:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:CSC Patch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantic Lottery Corporation (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crombie REIT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crombie REIT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply