User talk:Infinitywiki2

Hi Infinitywiki2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Tankishguy 13:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Tankishguy. Thanks, welcome! Thank you for your welcome! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 14:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

Hallo and Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for starting to help by making links. But please take more care. I've just seen the article Hussein Bicar as it's on my watch list. You made three links:

1. Arabic - yes, a useful link to the language
2. Documentary film - doubtful, we don't usually link within the name of an organisation
3. Medal of Honor - No. Did you look where this link goes? "The Medal of Honor (MOH) is the United States Armed Forces' highest military decoration". I don't think that's the award this man received. There is a disambiguation page Medal of Honor (disambiguation), but it does not mention any Egyptian honour. You could have made a red link to Medal of Honor (Egypt), assuming that this is likely to be the title of any future article written about this honor, but it would have been best just to leave it unlinked. Please always check the links you make, to ensure that you only link to appropriate articles. Thanks.

I'll revert the 2nd and 3rd of those links.

I had a look at your most recent edits, to Penal substitution: two good edits, but (a) don't link within a quote, and (b) did you look at The Book of the Law? It's a 1909 esoteric book, not something which would be referred to in the Bible! Two more rules: don't generally link within quotations, and, if the item you are thinking of linking to uses different capitalisation, be extra careful to check that it's really the same thing. I've undone that last link. PamD 15:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

And in Sue Harper Mims (born 1842) you assumed that her mother Mary C. Johnson Harper was Mary C. Johnson (born 1880), and linked her (I've unlinked). Many people share names. Please do not assume that just because a name happens to match it refers to the same person - often a simple check will show, in this case by birthdate, that it cannot be the same person. It would only have been sensible to link here if the article on her mother had mentioned having a daughter Sue or Susan born in 1842, or some other evidence to show that this was the right person. Please take more care, so that your many edits which improve the encyclopedia are not outweighed by the careless edits which damage it. Thanks. PamD 15:28, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@PamD. Thanks! I will do as you say! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

Hi Infinitywiki2! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 11:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Infinitywiki2! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Wikipedia's 25th birthday, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Abraham Islands (Alaska). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Wikipedia is considered a circular source and shouldn't be used. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rambley^[who?] 09:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your efforts. Unfortunately the way you are currently going about it will lead to those articles being deleted, so I wanted to let you know of two things: Wikipedia cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia, and chatbots like ChatGPT cannot be used to generate Wikipedia articles. Please stop mass-created Alaska Island articles and only create articles with actual, off-wikipedia reliable sources, and please write the article content yourself, rather than using a chatbot to generate the text. -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 15:41, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@LWG. Okay, I hope I understand you! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

The main thing is, don't put text from ChatGPT or Gemini or things like that into Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any other questions! -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 15:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@LWG. I understand, sorry, thank you for your work on Wikipedia.(Infinitywiki2 (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Abalone Island (Alaska). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Thank you very much for your contribution! Should I add more sources to this article now? (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

As @LWG mentioned above, please don't use chatGPT or another LLM to generate Wikipedia articles. Do your own research, find sources, and then write articles using the information in those sources. Broc (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Sorry, I had another question: "Why don't articles created by artificial intelligence chatbots comply with Wikipedia's rules, or their content?" (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

There are a lot of reasons, but the biggest one is that all information on Wikipedia has to be verifiable and chatbots output usually doesn't comply with our sourcing requirements (because chatbots don't actually know whether the sources they cite actually support the text they write). -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 16:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@LWG. Okey! 👍 (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Island (Alaska) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Island (Alaska) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Oh, I agree with you! That's right, the article should be deleted! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

A tag has been placed on Aghik Island (Alaska) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. Broc (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. I understand!(Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Aalus (Alaska). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and only uses Wikipedia as sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -- Reconrabbit 16:24, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Aleutika Island (Alaska). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Hello! Good day! How are you? What should I do now? (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

Expand the article with good quality sources, I think it's been said several times already. And don't use AI! Broc (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

okey, thanks! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

@Broc. Can I add sections to the article? The main part has enough sources! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:02, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

All you linked is information from a database. Wikipedia is not a database. If you find sources that cover the island in detail, and not simple database entries, please add them to the page and expand its content. It's not enough for a place to exist to "deserve" a page on Wikipedia. There must be sources discussing it in depth. Broc (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. I understand you, thank you for your guidance! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

I'll add something more to my previous comment. If you want to start creating articles for Wikipedia, choose a subject you are sufficiently familiar with. Research at least 2-3 reliable sources that cover the subject in detail. Then write the article in your own words using those sources, without copying and without using AI. This will make for a less frustrating experience of seeing your articles deleted or moved to draft. I'll be happy to help if you have specific questions. Broc (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Okay, I understand you! Everything is clear, thank you very much for your help! 👍👍 (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:17, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

@Broc. I added sections to the article, please check it out! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

You added again AI-generated content. Broc (talk) 16:37, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Sorry, I didn't use AI, I wrote it myself! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2026 (UTC))Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model, as you did at Babe Islands (Alaska). You have been warned several times by me and other users about creating machine-generated content. The pages you are creating contain no useful information nor sources. Please stop, this is your last warning. Broc (talk) 23:33, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Broc. Please delete all the car articles I created! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 03:26, 1 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Anyaka Island (Alaska). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zzz plant (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ban Island (Alaska) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ban Island (Alaska) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Alice Island (Alaska), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AusLondonder (talk) 18:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder Understand! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 08:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

Hello! I have noticed that you are editing your sandbox at a very rapid pace without adding that much meaningful content. I just want to remind you that you are at 442 edits at the time of this writing, if you are doing this to intentionally get to 500 edits to become extended confirmed, this is gaming the system and is not permitted. I see you have already made lots of constructive edits. Please continue doing those edits instead and you will be able to edit those pages. If you have any further questions please feel free to ask. Thanks! User3749 (talk) 09:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@User3749. Hello! I understand, I didn't aim to reach 500 edits on this meme! I'm just practicing editing my sandbox page! This is very useful for me! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

Thank you for clarifying that, I was just reminding you in case. User3749 (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@User3749 Oh, I understand you, but are the edits I made unconstructive? Thanks for reminding me! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:07, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

No, you have been doing lots of good work so far, just try not to overuse LLM models. Please keep contributing! User3749 (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@User3749 Oh, I get it! What are LLM models? Is there a page on the English Wikipedia to read and learn about it? (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

From a quick check of your talk page above, some of your pages were deleted because you used some sort of AI like ChatGPT to write them, and we typically don't allow that here. User3749 (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@User3749. I see you too, making very clear, objective, and consistent edits? Don't tire of preventing vandalism! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

@User3749 You're right, I didn't know that creating articles from artificial intelligences like ChatGPT and publishing them on Wikipedia was against the rules, and I stopped doing it immediately! Thanks! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

You're welcome, if you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. User3749 (talk) 09:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@User3749. Oh, thank you for your help, I really appreciate it! If I need help, I'll ask! (Infinitywiki2 (talk) 09:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC))Reply

Hello Infinitywiki2! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Enhanced verified users, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abduvaitov Sherzod 2 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abduvaitov Sherzod 2. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply