User talk:GreenRedFlag

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:A T M Wali Ashraf.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. GreenRedFlag (talk) 10:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I see that you're copy editing the article Islam in Vietnam as a part of the July 2024 backlog elimination. I noticed a copy edit tag in the subsection "The Cham Muslim Identity in the Mekong Delta", which tags the article as in need of copy editing and lists it here: Category:All articles needing copy edit). I suggest removing it to avoid any confusion :-) Kindly, Pinecone23 (talk) 09:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the reminder, going to remove it. Just I was waiting for the reference book "Cham Muslims of the Mekong Delta by Philip Taylor" as most of the references come from that. GreenRedFlag (talk) 09:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copyediting 1 long article during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:A T M Wali Ashraf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. The one-week October 2024 blitz doesn't start until the 13th UTC (and ends on the 19th). So, you should not be crediting editing that you have done before then as blitz totals. I think you can leave up what you have recorded, especially if you would not have made those edits otherwise; but you should really only record work done within the blitz time frame. Dhtwiki (talk) 21:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh no, I didn't notice, noted with thanks. GreenRedFlag (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi GreenRedFlag, I notice both yourself and another editor have logged Memory improvement in your sections. I have opened a section on the Blitz's talk page here. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

On 21 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Matia Chowdhury, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE October 2024 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 22:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the page DC Hill is still only partially translated from Bengali, are you still working on it? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am working on it, after finishing will submit. GreenRedFlag (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to DC Hill. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and there is no text content, once a lead and some body text is translated this can be moved back to mainspace, if ready. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 15:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I did not submit it either, for some reason It got published. Anyway, I am working on it. Thanks for your reminder. GreenRedFlag (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GreenRedFlag,

Thank you for creating Batisha Union.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good job structure-wise, the only (slight) issues I saw were a lack of references and a lack of descriptive categories. They are all minor fixes, so don't worry. :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sir MemeGod}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SirMemeGod  18:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I am working on it and will add references as early. GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thanks for copyediting Political marriages in India. Your work is much appreciated. - Ratnahastin (talk) 14:25, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. GreenRedFlag (talk) 16:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

		The (old school) League of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 30,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE November 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copyediting 11 articles during the GOCE November 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copyediting 1 long article during the GOCE November 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copyediting 10 old articles during the GOCE November 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 11:36, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GreenRedFlag. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DC Hill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/themes/defence/caf/militaryhistory/dhh/official/book-1956-army-ww2-2-en.pdf, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I admit, I should spend few times to rewrite it to avoid copyright matter. Please check if the below writing is OK.

"By the end of August, the Tenth Army's sector, spanning from just north of Vicchio to Pesaro in the east, displayed a formidable array of defenses. It included 2,375 machine-gun posts, 479 positions for antitank guns, mortars, and assault guns, and 3,604 dugouts and shelters, among them 27 caves. Additionally, there were 16,006 riflemen’s positions, featuring embrasures made from fallen trees and branches. The Germans had also laid 72,517 Teller antitank mines and 23,172 S-mines, alongside 73 miles of wire obstacles and 9,780 yards of antitank ditches. However, only four Panzerturms had been completed, with 18 more under construction and seven others planned. Out of 46 smaller tank gun turrets intended to mount 1- and 2-centimetre guns, only 18 were operational. Furthermore, while 22 steel shelters were under construction, none had reached completion."

GreenRedFlag (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The new version is okay. Thanks for taking the time to do that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure GreenRedFlag (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2025 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waleed A. Alrodhan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waleed A. Alrodhan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 00:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 3rd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 00:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE October 2025 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 15:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you GreenRedFlag (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I think something technical went wrong with your AFC decline of this draft. It is still on the list of pending drafts despite not having been re-submitted since your decline. I thought you might want to clean it up yourself. Thanks for your contributions. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 14:15, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for bringing it to my attention. This was happened due to a process done by EarwigBot. I have done another review. GreenRedFlag (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

At Alternative Airlines, you accepted a draft which was both promotional and likely generated by an LLM. Please be more cautious and thorough in your AfC reviews going forward. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I'll be more cautious, especially for living person and company pages. GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

thank for your efforts in AfC reviews. I am curious if you looked at all the references and citations I included in Draft:Helmut_Portmann, being the Technical Director of the National Data Buoy Center see ^[1] and Mr. Portmann Official US Government information about his position ^[2], is not promotional. The position Mr. Portmann occupied was the civilian equivalent of a general or admiral in the US military service. NDBC is critical to the welfare of thousands. It is the one of the key sensor components of the global Tsunami Alert System that millions of people depend. You may or may not be aware of tsunamis catastrophic impact. It might not be in the news every day, but certainly is pretty notable when it happens ( 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami; 9.1 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia; More than 230,000 people were killed in 14 countries, 2011 Tohoku Tsunami off the coast of Japan Over 15,000 people were killed).

Being one of the key people in the world responsible for alerting the entire world to incoming tsunamis is not trivial.Emoritz2017 (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia requires significant independent coverage in reliable secondary sources (WP:GNG + WP:BIO). The draft doesn’t show that. Patents, technical reports, NOAA documents, IEEE papers, promotional interviews about his novels, and an obituary are not the type of independent journalism that establishes notability.

Wikipedia needs:

Major newspaper profiles

Investigative pieces

Magazine features

Peer-reviewed biographical analyses

Books written by others about him or his work

Example: The tsunamis incident should be published by secondary source to established Wikipedia guideline for notability. The current reference is from primary source. You need to add secondary source from prominent newspaper.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi GreenRedFlag, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Sohom (talk) 13:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello GreenRedFlag:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help!

// hekatlys [talk] 18:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GreenRedFlag (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello GreenRedFlag, Thank you for reviewing my draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Al-Khafji_solar_desalination_plant&action=history)). I made a couple of changes including removing the references that may be considered not independent. I also added more independent references like an article from Arab news. The plant is widely covered even on published books but I feel like I am struggling to identify the best references that will prove notability. I am working on this article as part of my energy transition course for geoscience at Rice university and I am really optimistic that I got it right now. Please feel free to review and share your opinion when you have time. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by SufyanMN (talk • contribs) 08:24, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The page must be rewritten according to Wikipedia guidelines and enriched with proper citations from reliable secondary sources. GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 21:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

		The (modern) Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 40,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 21:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey!

Just reaching out because you said I needed to find new sources from preferably specialized dutch publishers. I did actually use the book De Nederlandse stalen helm 1916 - 1992 ISBN: 978-90-90-31777-9 by Kevin de Joode for 95% of the draft. Which I hope was evident by the citation ratio. This is a specialized book made by a dutch work group to collect all information on Dutch 20th century helmets and is a wealth of information.

I have removed the links to the website, which is actually created by the workgroup that made the book and has overlapping information. I added the citations when I was not home with the book. I have replaced the citations with what I found in the book.

Hope this helps with the review

protoj protoj (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

https://www.oorlogsmuseum.nl/nl/webshop/de-nederlandse-stalen-helm-1916--1992/

Link^ protoj (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points. The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026. The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive. Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants. Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points. Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for your work at AfC. Please avoid using AI-generated text in AfC decline notices and comments, such as the one at Draft:Cherie Lily. Reviews should reflect the reviewer's own judgment and be written personally for the benefit of contributors. Thank you. HurricaneZeta^C 15:08, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, You previously reviewed and declined the draft for Draft:Knight Architects due to promotional tone and a lack of secondary independent citations. I wanted to let you know that I have rewritten and resubmitted the draft - The text is now fully factual and supported by new independent coverage from sources including The Times, The Guardian, and BBC News. I would be very grateful if you had the time to take a fresh look at the resubmitted draft, and I welcome any further feedback you might have to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards. Thank you for your time TomOsborne1983 (talk) 17:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SouthCity Indonesia, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superblock was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, rectified. GreenRedFlag (talk) 09:51, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @GreenRedFlag, thank you for the constructive feedback! I have restructured the draft based on your advice. I removed the bulleted lists, merged the most notable projects into a factual prose history, pruned the awards to avoid promotional tone, and stripped out any primary references pointing to the company website. I have also formally declared my COI on my User Page as requested. Thank you again for your guidance. TomOsborne1983 (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @GreenRedFlag, thank you for the constructive feedback! I completely rewrote the article and put independent references in it. Could you have another look at it and let me know wether there is something missing still. I would really appreciate it. Thank you so much! Heinrich1248 (talk) 10:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @GreenRedFlag, thank you for the constructive feedback! I removed all three non-independent (I guess that's what you mean by 'secondary') sources from the article. All the mentioned sources are now entirely independent sources. Also: According to your suggestions I made a number of changes concerning the wording and the structure of the text. Please have another look at it. Thank you so much. Heinrich1248 (talk) 11:50, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Naturewatch Foundation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GreenRedFlag for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2026 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 22:51, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

It isn't properly tagged on the draft talk page, so just in case you weren't aware, the editor is being paid to create this article. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the information. GreenRedFlag (talk) 21:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello GreenRedFlag,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Alexandra Ferrara (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

So I was just seeing the copyedits of some of the people in the drive, and I noticed you have marked all of your articles with *O. Please note that the *O or *R is only applicable to the months mentioned at the top of the drive. Many of the ones you have marked are from January 2026, not 2025 which is applicable for the 50% bonus. Thanks, TNM101 (chat) 15:56, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

My bad, thanks for bringing it to my notice. Can you give me the link to the filtered article? Will appreciate.GreenRedFlag (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry what do you mean by filtered article? TNM101 (chat) 11:47, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I meant how to get only selected months category. I already got the list. Previously I did not notice. Thanks. GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

👍TNM101 (chat) 14:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I wanted to reach out because I noticed you recently draftified Draft:2026–27 Korea Cup. I see no issue with the draftification, so no worries! I just wanted to recommend that you install the MoveToDraft script if you regularly draftify articles. The script makes the draftification process easier, including notifying the editor, moving to draft, adding AfC things, and tagging the redirect for R2 speedy deletion. It can be super useful for NPP. Let me know if you have any questions. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:32, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreenRedFlag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I have read and understand the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure requirements. I now know that I should have disclosed my conflict of interest and that promotional editing is not allowed.

I admit that I was paid for my edits. My affiliation is: [I am an employee of / I was hired by] [Company/Client Name], and I was editing articles about [subject]. I did not disclose this payment, and I apologise for that.

To ensure this never happens again, I will refrain entirely from editing anything related to [subject/client/industry] going forward. I will not edit those articles, their talk pages, or any related discussions. I want to move on and contribute to other areas of Wikipedia where I have no conflict of interest, and I will always follow the neutral point of view policy and all disclosure rules.

Please consider giving me a second chance to edit constructively outside of this topic. Thank you. GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

[Decline reason here] Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 20:02, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

[snarky comment about using AI as an NPP reviewer here] – LuniZunie_(talk) 20:03, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreenRedFlag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Don't know why bottom reply link is not working and prompting to use full page edit. Actually, this is beyond my expectations and I messed everything up while writing in a hurry, pasting the wrong things. Here is my reply: I have read and understand the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure requirements. I now know that I should have disclosed my conflict of interest and that promotional editing is not allowed. I admit that I was paid for my edits. My affiliation is: I was requested by a member of the Company, and I was editing articles on [Ugandan North American Association] as I found it notable. I did not disclose this payment, and I apologise for that. I will refrain entirely from editing anything related to the subject matter. I will not edit the article, talk pages, or any related discussions. I want to move on and contribute to other areas of Wikipedia where I have no conflict of interest, and I will always follow the neutral point of view policy and all disclosure rules. Just have a look at my Guild Copy Editing contribution during my idle time. Please consider giving me a second chance to edit constructively outside of this topic. Thank you. GreenRedFlag (talk) 18:43, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It's very clear from the evidence that you're not telling us the whole truth. As I said below, you need to disclose all the people/entities that have paid you to edit. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GreenRedFlag, you need to disclose all the people/entities that have paid you to edit. The answers you've given us so far are not complete. Please respond using your own words, not those of AI. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! To help us respond to the request, please review Wikipedia's payment disclosure policy and conflict of interest guideline, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think, in addition to the above, you need to disclose whether you have used AI (a chatbot/LLM, etc.), in any of your other writing, since you clearly used it in your first unblock request, before any unblock could even be considered. Where else on Wikipedia have you used AI-generated content? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is my reply to all questions: Please check all my edits for any AI-generated content. Most of my edits were small chunks for grammar, errors, updates, or adding/updating citations. So there was no AI involved. I have created very few articles; those are beyond COI. As I mentioned earlier, the non-profit organization article I have created was my fault. As an AfC or NPP reviewer, I tried to help pages that met at least the Wiki standard, and in some cases, I copy-edited to get them published. I didn't want to be too rigid. Also, there was a NPP award point issue for NPP reviewers, that incline me to review more, but I think that was a hard part.

I again ask you to check my history.GreenRedFlag (talk) 21:23, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of GreenRedFlag for accumulating at least 50 points in the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 15:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GreenRedFlag. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:10, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dear Participant,

Thank you so much for participating in the Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026 campaign! Whether you were writing articles or uploading photos to Wikimedia Commons, your contributions have helped share beautiful traditions, Islamic history, and cultural heritage with the rest of the world.

We want to make sure next year's campaign is even better, and we need your help to do it! We would love it if you could take 3–5 minutes to fill out our quick Participant Feedback Form.

• Link to form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScw_bPHsVzpby50jc2_syJD5-mS9scnRL5BLv9UXH2tK3Mr8w/viewform

Thank you again for sharing your knowledge and creativity with the Wikimedia movement. Keep an eye on your talk page and our social media for the final winner announcements soon! Happy editing,

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Project Lead) for the Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026 International Team. 20:13, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dear Participant

Hope this message finds you in good health and high spirits.

First of all, a massive thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026! Whether you enriched Wikipedia with new articles or added beautiful photos to Wikimedia Commons, your valuable contributions have played a great role in preserving Ramadan traditions and heritage for the world to see.

To help us understand your experience and improve our future campaigns, we kindly request you to share your thoughts through our short feedback form.

• Link to form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScw_bPHsVzpby50jc2_syJD5-mS9scnRL5BLv9UXH2tK3Mr8w/viewform
• Deadline: 31 July 2026

It will only take about 3 to 5 minutes of your time. You can tell us what you loved, what difficulties you faced, and even help us translate a short banner message into your native language for next year!

Your voice matters a lot to us. Thank you once again for your wonderful contributions and for being such an active part of the Wikimedia movement.

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Project Lead) for the Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026 International Team. 20:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply