If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply clicking the plus sign (+), "New section", or "Add topic" at the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.
Welcome!
Hi GearsDatapack! I noticed your contributions to Bus (computing) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. I can't recommend any specific article, but you could try setting your homepage to show you edits from music-related articles, and then looking through until you find something in a topic area you like. Once you're a bit more comfortable with adding content to articles, you could take a look at Category:Heavy metal music stubs for a list of metal-related articles that need expanding. You can also do a search using categories to find specific combinations, such as Heavy metal articles which need copy-editing. For a more general list of tasks you can try, see the task centre. You can use that to find the category for a specific task, then do a search for pages both in that category and Category:Heavy metal music. Hopefully you can find something! {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 14:10, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's fair. I guess I weighed the arguments to delete the current article against the suggestions for moving to pluviculture, whereas in reality I suppose someone suggesting deletion is indifferent to the title of the article before it's deleted. The Rain prayer article wasn't discussed except for the one person who proposed the alternative, so it's hard to evaluate whether there's actual consensus there. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 21:02, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 22 May 2026
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: Offline: Osama Khalid still in prison He has been imprisoned since 2020 for his Wikipedia edits. A fresh campaign is calling for his release.
Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. Anyone can create a page, yes. For your first article, you'll need to go through articles for creation, where someone will review your article before it is published. I would suggest reading Help:Your first article to understand the process.The basics is that you need to make sure your chosen subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, then create a draft using the article wizard. Once ready, press "Submit for review" and wait until your article is reviewed. Some helpful essays to read:
Hello! Looks like you've been reassigned to me as your previous mentor is inactive. I like to think I'm a reasonably good mentor; I try to answer questions as quickly and as helpfully as possible. There's only one way for you to find out though... {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 12:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Consensus is not a vote. In the discussion I see one "Support" !vote that discusses pageview data, which is not really relevant to the discussion, and one which just says "per nom". On the other hand, the arguments against the move explain their position and cite policies to back up their arguments. To me, the arguments presented are enough to determine consensus. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 11:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm aware it's not a vote, but considering all parties have given rationales you seem to be employing a supervote here. Saying "per nom" just means I entirely agree with the nomination, which is a perfectly valid opinion and should not be discounted as you appear to have done. And I fail to see why Crouch's comment was not relevant. It was entirely relevant. It was pointing out that neither was more notable per pageviews and the disambiguation was insufficient as both are bands. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I didn't discount your argument, or that of the nominator or Crouch, Swale. From what I gathered:
The arguments in favour of moving are that the two articles exist and have a similar number of pageviews.
The arguments against moving are that there are already hatnotes in place, and that WP:NCBAND (which is an official guideline) dictates that these are to use separate disambiguators and that they are already sufficiently distinct.
Hello! Firstly, I apologise but I don't speak Dutch so I'm going to ask that we converse in English. If you want to use Dutch, you're better off going to the Dutch Wikipedia. I can't explain everything about Wikipedia to you here, as there's a lot to learn. For an overview, you may want to see Help:Introduction. If you have a more specific question, feel free to ask me here, or at the Teahouse. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 22:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
User Grapesurgeon moved page Pascal Lottaz to Draft:Pascal Lottaz without leaving a redirect: Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace. Reason/s: more sources needed .
Being used to the US legal system, I find such remark "arbitrary and capricious" (see Standard of review for definition). The number of cited sources is comparable to the numbers in the articles about other International Relations professors (e.g. Steven Walt). I do not want to start a fight with Grapesurgeon. I'd rather place this draft for a discussion. How can I do it? --ArcturusNotTaurus (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I don't really have time to look through the article, but I'll tell you some things that you can do. Firstly, the raw number of sources doesn't matter so much, it's more about the quality of the sources (i.e. are they reliable and independent?), and the extent to which they support the claims made in the article. Is if you have a shorter article, you'll generally need fewer sources. Wikipedia requires every claim to be backed up by a reliable source.
My suggested next steps for you are to either: message Grapesurgeon directly at User talk:grapesurgeon, and ask them to clarify exactly why they moved it back to draftspace, or submit it through articles for creation, where someone else will review it and decide whether it's ready for mainspace.
Latest comment: 2 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! Can I access my sandbox to start drafting an article before I edit 10 others? I want to start practising, and although I have verified my email, my username page isn't showing as ready yet.
Thank you! --Sparklyamanda (talk) 15:09, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I don't think you can create pages until you are autoconfirmed, but you can either use the article wizard to create a draft in the Draft: namespace, or if you like I can create your sandbox for you, and you can edit it from there. I will say though, it will probably be easier to start writing a new article once you have a bit of experience editing existing ones, so consider trying some easier tasks before jumping straight into article writing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi! thank you for your reply. I have watched quite a few tutorials and I feel confident enough to make a start on my article, but I will also practise editing. I would like it if you could create my sandbox for me please, I can make a start. It's about a person. I want to at least start it so I can work on it and also practise editing skills concurrently. Sparklyamanda (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
HI! I have tried to make a start, but the sandbox looks different to the tutorials I have been watching. The citation button doesn't have a drop down menu. I have just done the introduction so I can await further feedback. Also, how do I add photos? There are lot freely available on line and I know they need to be credited, but I'm not sure about this either as I can't claim ownership can I ? Or does it come under the creative commons on here? I downloaded one but I wasn't sure how to proceed. I would appreciate our advice!
Hmm, I'm not sure about the differences in the editing menu. As far as I know, userspace pages have the exact same editing interface as mainspace articles. Is it possible you were watching an old video from a previous Wikipedia interface? The design has changed somewhat over the years.As for photos, you will need to upload them to Wikimedia Commons. If you are upload photos that you didn't take yourself, you need to make sure that they are released under a Creative Commons license (one which allows both commercial use and modification), or a similarly compatible license. The commons upload wizard guides you through the process. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 11:16, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You moved this, but one of the key !votes in support seems confused about whether the title of the article was Saint Olaf or Saint Olav. Makes a big difference for common name. Srnec (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.
Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Dear Mentor: I have databases about many subjects hosted on EndNote platform. EndNote can create reference list in many [styles], but not in Wikipedia-style. They can create such style for free, but they need an official request from Wikipedia itself (not from me) to do this. Can you figure out a solution to this problem or get a Higher Authority to get involved into this project? --ArcturusNotTaurus (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I'm just a volunteer editor like everyone else on this platform so I don't have any more authority than you. You can try to contact the Wikimedia Foundation, but won't necessarily get any useful results. The Wikipedia visual editor allows automatic generation of Wikipedia citations and understands various different formats, so that's probably the easiest way to go about this. I believe BibTex is supported, though I'm not totally sure. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:14, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago12 comments3 people in discussion
HI, I am happy with my article and I have published it in my sandbox. I am still doing other edits so that my 'Jordan Sangha' article can get published live more quickly.
Can you advise me of my next step please? It is showing that I have made more than 10 edits on my home page, so I am not sure if / when / how I can move my article to another space to get it reviewed/ approved more quickly. I will continue to make other edits but can you tell me the fastest way to get my article live please? Thank you --Sparklyamanda (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! If you've submitted through AFC, there's not really anything to do but wait I'm afraid. If you're autoconfirmed then you can move the article to mainspace, but for your first article, especially if you don't have much prior editing experience, I would recommend waiting to get it reviewed by someone more experienced. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 20:48, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it's articles for creation, the process by which new users submit articles to be published. If you have something sitting in your sandbox without submitting it for review, people won't touch it as it's generally considered polite not to touch userspace pages from other users (unless they're violating Wikipedia policy). {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:15, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok that's great. It's finished , and I pressed publish . So do I need to move it now? I thought publishing it meant others could see it.
if I move it, where am I moving it too? I don't want to lose it!
You are correct that others can see it - anyone can in fact - however, it's still a user page, which means it won't get indexed by search engines and can't be linked to by other articles in the encyclopedia. Once it's ready, you can move it to "mainspace", which is where proper articles live.
As to the title, it should be a minimal identification of the subject of the article. So for a person, it would be their name.
Thank you. I do not have a conflict of interest with him so that's ok. So shall I just move it to the main space? Could you advise me how please? Sparklyamanda (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Once you move it to mainspace, it's part of the encyclopedia. It needs to be reviewed by a new page reviewer to determine whether it meets Wikipedia's core content policies before it is indexed by search engines. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 17:41, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
oh thank you. I can see it has gone from my sandbox which is now a redirect page.
I got a message saying i need to clean up but I don't think I have to do anything ? I don't have a sort category on my page and I haven't changed anything on my sandbox links.
So presuming it meets the criteria, how long does the article take to get reviewed? I am hoping it does as I have sources and linked everything. Do I get a notification message or email or do I just need to keep checking in on wikipedia to see if it is there?
You should get a notification when someone reviews it. There's no set timeframe, as reviewers don't review articles in any particular order. If no one reviews it for 90 days, it will automatically be considered reviewed. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 18:23, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "extendedmover" (Page movers) will expire on 00:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion.Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there,so sometimes there are movies which go by a certain name in one language but when they get dubbed the name of the movie changes in the dubbed language as well.How do I write both and explain about them? --Erfanyx (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Biks is going to be delivered to the link below to get started my dear friend request for the link to the link below to register your account please send me your WhatsApp number so I can get 🥫 or something for you to send me your WhatsApp number please send me your WhatsApp number so I can get the money and send it to me please don't forget to pay me back when you get started my dear friend request for the link to join my WhatsApp group please. Thank you 6 --MonirAhamed 01714296703 (talk) 19:31, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 21 June 2026
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, GearsDatapacks. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Heya, is there something Wikipedia editors usually use for library/newspaper-database access? I’m looking for contemporary coverage of a South Korean building collapse from the 90s, but a lot of archives are paywalled.
Also, is there anything you’d recommend for journal access given that Sci-hub kind of sucks now? I heard if you make 500 edits across 6 months you get access to the Wikipedia Library. Should I minmax edits with this goal in mind and save more ambitious research for later? What’s the culture/strat around this? Ty. --JeniPanic (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. I would suggest starting with the "Suggested edits" that can be found on your home page. There are different levels from easy to hard, and they guide you through the process of each type, helping you learn the basics of Wikipedia editing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 00:59, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello there! This is my 3rd mentor right? Well... two of my mentors just left for a single reason. But anyways, how are you? Well... just kidding you are still my mentor, since grazie left me. Lexter31 (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Can I make a page about the Original Vol 2 Odd Future Tapes (2008)? It is only mentioned on other pages and doesn't have a standalone page itself. --Khosdude (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, there!
Thanks for being my mentor.
On references, I have been changing "page" and "pages" to "p." and "pp.". Is this acceptable? --Adriene67 (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Is there a way to determine which version of English to use for entries if not obvious (as with an American-, British-, Australian-originated article)? Adriene67 (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Use whichever one the article currently uses; don't change it without good reason. Most articles have a template at the beginning which tells you which variant to use, which is invisible to readers but should show up when you start editing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 19:16, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, GearsDatapacks. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole or hamster wheel, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the § Survey when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 03:15, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 13 July 2026
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: An exclusive club Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
In the media: Battle for a soul – who won? Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!
On the bright side: Fatherhood, weather, and diplomacy Father's Day, Canada Day, and the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence.
Latest comment: 29 days ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Mentor and everyone,
I’m new to this community and would appreciate some guidance. I have questions about Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons policy, particularly the privacy of non-public relatives and the treatment of unsupported personal information.
I would also welcome an independent review of the concerns I raised regarding the proposed deletion of the Lawrence Irving Wilde article. I am concerned that the discussion has moved beyond a neutral assessment of reliable sources and has not fully respected BLP principles. Some comments appear aimed at discrediting the artist and his family rather than constructively improving the article.
I would be grateful for guidance on how these privacy and conduct concerns should be addressed and I would appreciate guidance from my mentor or any experienced editor who sees this question. --MapleLeaf33 (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Can you point to the specific parts which you think violate policy? I've looked through the discussion and from what I can see, every comment only discusses sources, not anything beyond that relating to the subject or their family members. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 07:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Editors discussed the private name and former name of the subject’s mother;
another family member’>s deleted article;
alleged connections between family members and Wikipedia accounts;
claims of “family-wide” promotional editing;
birthplaces, name changes, and personal records involving the family. A BLP correction should not automatically trigger a notability investigation or become a reason to scrutinize an entire family. Notability may be reviewed separately, but the person reporting a privacy violation should not appear to be punished for raising it. The article should be assessed fairly on reliable sources, and ut is there , they are calming that not. There all google full info about him notability should not accessed when the BLP concerns are corrected independently. I noted that mother name there and his artist name Boguinia called birth name, now they called it former name but it be better for living person to be removed at all when he is changing his image. It can be some place in article if needed , but not in line with real life name. Artists has many names through lives. Those names are not listed in line with birth name. Not articles has and place of bitth and date of birth! That also could be removed. But not article. Just fixed BLP issues. Which I raised. MapleLeaf33 (talk) 07:58, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 27 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello GearsDatapacks:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.
Latest comment: 26 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is there a way to find more specific articles I can edit? I am not an expert on sports, but I am in alpine skiing, and would love to help edit related articles! --J0bapplication821 (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there, I am an employee of the Russell Group and have a conflict of interest. I'd like to suggest a couple of edits to the page. I will not edit the article directly and will only propose changes on the Talk page but can you walk me through how to do this please? --ER2026 (talk) 11:05, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I would strongly suggest you don't. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it's an encyclopedia. Your company is likely not notable, so if you tried then the article would most likely be deleted. Having a Wikipedia article should not be a marketing goal for you; Wikipedia doesn't exist to promote companies, and you don't have any editorial control over what the article says, meaning it's likely that it won't give information on your company in the same light as you would like. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 08:57, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello!!
Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't really edit on here very much anymore, so I can't tell exactly when you were added as my mentor (when do I get to stop having one of those, anyways?!) but it's cool to see they have a system in place in case the other one falls through!
Hello! I believe the mentorship module automatically disappears when you become extended confirmed (I may be wrong about that though), or you can turn it off somewhere in your preferences. I think I will still technically "be" your mentor, as in, the data exists somewhere in Wikipedia's servers, but for all intents and purposes, you won't have a mentor if you disable it. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 09:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
so there is this list of a singer's soundtracks that I'm working on,there are some mistakes that I've been trying to fix.there is a table with the name of the movies,names of the songs they've sung,lyricists etc.for some movies they have sung more than 1 song so I want to write the names of the songs but the row wouldn't divide into 2 or 3 more sections for me to write the info Erfanyx (talk) 17:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
yes that's the article.so one of the movies was released in 1988 but it was put on the list of 1989 so I tried to fix it.after correcting it I realised the singer was given credit to for 3 songs of the film but I couldn't make 3 seperated attached rows for the same movie to write the names of 3 songs I had space for only 1 name however there some movies with the song name part divided into 3 or 2 other parts with the names and the number of songs written how do I do that?how do I make more rows in one row? Erfanyx (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ah, got it. So if you're using the visual editor, what you can do is first make three separate rows and fill in all the information for each one. Then, you select the three cells which contain the movie title (by dragging from one to the other), and a button should appear in the bottom middle of the screen that says "Merge cells", which should do what you want. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 13:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi GearsDatapacks,
There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.
By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.