The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-06-16T02:36:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-06-16T02:36:00.000Z-Books_&_Bytes_-_Issue_17","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Tavix-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-URESWNI_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z","replies":["c-Tavix-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z-URESWNI_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"URESWNI listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"URESWNI listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Tavix-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-URESWNI_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z","replies":["c-Tavix-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z-URESWNI_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"URESWNI listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"URESWNI listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect URESWNI. Since you had some involvement with the URESWNI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Tavix(talk)20:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z","author":"Tavix","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tavix-2016-06-16T20:51:00.000Z-URESWNI_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->
You said in your edit where you changed the lead image in the article that "same Flicker stream (2015 PaleyFest) has a few more suitable images". I'm in touch with the the person behind the stream - in fact I got that image originally. Which other image(s) do you have in mind? Oh, BTW, I think the new image you put into the article in worse than the PaleyFest one. Tabercil (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-01T16:59:00.000Z","author":"Tabercil","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tabercil-2016-07-01T16:59:00.000Z-Sarah_Hyland_image","replies":["c-Edgarde-2016-07-01T17:40:00.000Z-Tabercil-2016-07-01T16:59:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Tabercil: The problem looked obvious to me, but perhaps it is more subjective than I thought. This is the one in the article. I was quickly able to find two similar shots without the deep facial creases:
There are others. And if you really prefer the previous image, I'm not interested in fighting for the change. / edg☺☭17:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-01T17:40:00.000Z","author":"Edgarde","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Edgarde-2016-07-01T17:40:00.000Z-Tabercil-2016-07-01T16:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Tabercil-2016-07-01T18:31:00.000Z-Edgarde-2016-07-01T17:40:00.000Z"],"displayName":"edg"}}-->
Hey I like those creases - to me, it's called a smile :) (Granted, edging into a smirk). She looks too dour in the other images you recommended for my taste which is why I didn't ask for them. Tabercil (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-01T18:31:00.000Z","author":"Tabercil","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Tabercil-2016-07-01T18:31:00.000Z-Edgarde-2016-07-01T17:40:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-08-31T23:25:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-08-31T23:25:00.000Z-Books_&_Bytes_-_Issue_18","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mdann52-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mdann52-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!"}-->
Hello, Edgarde. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"Mdann52","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mdann52-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!_2-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!_2"],"text":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!_2-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!_2"],"text":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! 2"}-->
Hello, Edgarde. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!_2","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-01-18T00:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_20-2017-01-18T00:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-01-18T00:00:00.000Z-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_20"],"text":"Books and Bytes - Issue 20","linkableTitle":"Books and Bytes - Issue 20"}-->
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-04-06T22:54:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-04-06T22:54:00.000Z-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_21","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-06-20T18:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_22-2017-06-20T18:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-06-20T18:35:00.000Z-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_22"],"text":"Books and Bytes - Issue 22","linkableTitle":"Books and Bytes - Issue 22"}-->
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-20T18:35:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-06-20T18:35:00.000Z-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_22","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-08-23T02:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_23-2017-08-23T02:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-08-23T02:04:00.000Z-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_23"],"text":"Books and Bytes - Issue 23","linkableTitle":"Books and Bytes - Issue 23"}-->
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-23T02:04:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-08-23T02:04:00.000Z-Books_and_Bytes_-_Issue_23","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SMcCandlish-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Family_Guy_lead,_redux-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-SMcCandlish-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z-Family_Guy_lead,_redux"],"text":"Family Guy lead, redux","linkableTitle":"Family Guy lead, redux"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SMcCandlish-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Family_Guy_lead,_redux-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-SMcCandlish-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z-Family_Guy_lead,_redux"],"text":"Family Guy lead, redux","linkableTitle":"Family Guy lead, redux"}-->
Please see Talk:Family guy#Participant survey, about resolving questions not resolved in the earlier RfC. — SMcCandlish☏¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 17:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z","author":"SMcCandlish","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SMcCandlish-2017-10-01T17:06:00.000Z-Family_Guy_lead,_redux","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Edgarde. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.
After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin Andrevan was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including Winkelvi and the notorious MONGO.
Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story)
WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.
At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."
Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.
Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.
Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:
53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
"Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
"Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."
In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.
Thanks for uploading File:P-nutty2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-09T03:37:00.000Z","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-2018-11-09T03:37:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:P-nutty2.jpg","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Edgarde. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2018_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
I've reverted a couple of your recent changes as I see no evidence for your claim that the video is a "hoax" and "almost certainly fictional". Of course, good sources (beyond IMDb) should be provided if they exist, but that is not the same point. Anyway, I suggest that you make your case on the article talk page(s) rather than in edit summaries. Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:20, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-05-12T20:20:00.000Z","author":"Ghmyrtle","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ghmyrtle-2019-05-12T20:20:00.000Z-The_\"White_Rabbit\"_video","replies":[]}}-->
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:04:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:04:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JJPMaster-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Garage_days_revisited\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-JJPMaster-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z-\"Garage_days_revisited\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"\"Garage days revisited\" listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"\"Garage days revisited\" listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JJPMaster-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\"Garage_days_revisited\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-JJPMaster-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z-\"Garage_days_revisited\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion"],"text":"\"Garage days revisited\" listed at Redirects for discussion","linkableTitle":"\"Garage days revisited\" listed at Redirects for discussion"}-->
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Garage days revisited. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 13#Garage days revisited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JJPMaster (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z","author":"JJPMaster","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JJPMaster-2020-10-13T16:04:00.000Z-\"Garage_days_revisited\"_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T01:17:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T01:17:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T00:04:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-23T00:04:00.000Z-ArbCom_2021_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FastilyBot-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Proposed_deletion_of_Philippine_Entertainment_Portal-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-FastilyBot-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Philippine_Entertainment_Portal"],"text":"Proposed deletion of Philippine Entertainment Portal","linkableTitle":"Proposed deletion of Philippine Entertainment Portal"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FastilyBot-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Proposed_deletion_of_Philippine_Entertainment_Portal-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-FastilyBot-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Philippine_Entertainment_Portal"],"text":"Proposed deletion of Philippine Entertainment Portal","linkableTitle":"Proposed deletion of Philippine Entertainment Portal"}-->
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z","author":"FastilyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FastilyBot-2022-01-07T10:00:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Philippine_Entertainment_Portal","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221129002600","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221129002600-ArbCom_2022_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Hi, sorry for manually reverting your revert rather than clicking on “undo”; I’d started to make more changes than were actually called for, and minus those, it amounted to just re-reverting you. I explained why in the edit summary, but the supporting text in the cited source is limited to a circular reference to the very same article, and the {{cn}} template had evidently been present on that claim since at least 2010.
Cheers. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 20:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230612205800","author":"151.132.206.250","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-151.132.206.250-20230612205800-RINO_revert","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231128002100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231128002100-ArbCom_2023_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->