User talk:Disranter

I've removed your edit because of the source. Ralph Ellis is a fringe, self-published writer, and doesn't meet our criteria at WP:VERIFY and WP:RS - and it was

User talk:Disranter

Welcome

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Disranter! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dougweller (talk) 09:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Joseph of Arimathea

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I've removed your edit because of the source. Ralph Ellis is a fringe, self-published writer, and doesn't meet our criteria at WP:VERIFY and WP:RS - and it was he who added his own publiction. Here's a reliable source [1]. Dougweller (talk) 09:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


The reference I gave is the Vulgate Cycle, the original source; a series of books that is difficult to locate and is not on the net. The populist book is just easier to locate the quotes in. And the reference you gave does not mention Josephus. Are you saying it is better to make up references, rather than use real ones? Disranter (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, you may not know this, but Wikipedia policy prohibits editors from making more than three reverts on an article in a 24-hour period. Exceeding that limit may lead to a block. Additionally, editors may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not exceed the 3 revert limit. I've posted some feedback on the talk page; let's discuss it there.--Cúchullain t/c 17:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Administrators Notice Board/Incidents

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TFOWR 18:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.