User talk:Cseverance

Anyone working in the SEO field must have realized that DMOZ has self destructed over the last few years. There seems to still be so much talk about the directo

User talk:Cseverance

Anyone working in the SEO field must have realized that DMOZ has self destructed over the last few years. There seems to still be so much talk about the directory and Google has even built a directory around it. WHY? The information in the directory (at least in many of the obsolete categories) is out of date and some does not even exist any longer. What is worse than that is that it is near impossible to get any new information into it!

So, why does Google still have a directory that uses dead information if they are the half baked Wikipedia of the internet? If anyone can offer insight to the continued existence of the DMOZ then please share it with us. If anyone has any influence on the DMOZ please flex your muscle and get it back online and up to date so we all can enjoy a real time internet and not an antique shop of outdated links and information. --President Subnetconsulting.com 11:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Advertising

Please do not add advertising to Wikipedia, as you did here. It is against Wikipedia policy and has been reverted. Thank you. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ... discospinster talk 02:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cseverance (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

When I had added this post I was not aware of the terms of service and was venting about something that I felt needed to be said. I unknowingly selected the wrong media for this vent. I have not made this mistake since that time. I now would like to focus on the transportation industry in Indiana and feel I can contribute with my knowledge of this industry in this state. Please allow me to post edits to this area of Wiki.

Decline reason:

You were promoting your company and clients. We take a dim view on using our encyclopedia for promotion. Chillum 06:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How could you not know the terms of use? You agreed to it when you signed up, and you agreed to it every time you clicked "Save page". Remember also that we don't want your knowledge of transportation in Indiana, we want knowledge that has been already documented in reliable sources the panda ₯’ 00:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.