User talk:Clements1997

{{help me}} How do you add references from another Wikipedia page?

Hello, Clements1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Philomena McDonagh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ducknish (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Philomena McDonagh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ducknish (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The

Adventure

Hi Clements1997!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Glenna Forster-Jones, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Glenna Forster-Jones to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Glenna Forster-Jones page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Queen Victoria because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 5 albert square (talk) 22:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kat Slater. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. We don't add relatives to the Infobox if they have never shared a scene together. This is as per the consensus at WP:EE 5 albert square (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5 albert square (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (2005). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. –anemoneprojectors– 15:43, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm PhilKnight. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lady Penelope Creighton-Ward, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 15:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.) 220 of ^Borg 19:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Barbara Ashcroft, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Barbara Ashcroft to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Ashcroft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Ashcroft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article Helen Cotterill has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jbh (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, seeing as you didn't leave an edit summary, I just wondered if you could clarify this edit. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 13:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

• • Sure. The character already appeared in that section, didn't see why she was there twice to begin with. Clements1997 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • Great stuff! I didn't even notice. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Clements1997, I can help you create references. They are very easy to do, once you get the technique. Drop me a line, and I will take you through it.scope_creep (talk) 23:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I've noticed that you've restored five articles related to Three's Company with no explanation.[1][2][3][4][5]. Each of these was previously redirected by AldezD in good faith on the basis that the articles didn't properly demonstrate that the general notability guideline had been met. I don't see that you've improved the article or addressed Aldez's concerns in any way, nor do I see that you've attempted to discuss this with anyone, so I'm curious on what basis you can justify restoring those articles. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Wbm1058: Since you've restored the Chrissy Snow article to a redirect, do you have any thoughts to express here? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chrissy SnowChrissy Snow was in Category:Articles with redirect hatnotes needing review, because Christmas Snow redirects to List of Three's Company characters#Chrissy Snow, and I get annoyed anytime I am obligated to do maintenance on articles about fictional characters. I also note #References above. wbm1058 (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

• I agree with reverting all. They were redirected for a good reason. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Coronation Street characters (1961) into Len Fairclough. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Regarding your recent edits to disambiguation (dab) and anthropononym (APO) pages, please read MOS:DABENTRY and WP:APO/S. Namely, there should only be one blue link per entry in a dab page, and no links in the descriptor for an APO page. Do read what those two guidelines say about when to use WP:PIPE as well. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please be advised that uncredited roles in films (and presumably other media) should be supported by the inclusion of reliable sources. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

When adding information to Wikipedia, it's best to start with a reliable source, and use that as the basis for what you put into an article. (It's easy, then, obviously, to add an inline citation, which will usually protect your text from being deleted.)

Personal knowledge (recognizing an actor when you view a movie, for example), or something you've read in a discussion group, or something that you heard a friend mention, should not be the basis for changing a Wikipedia article. If you can't find a reliable source for what you want to add, and then use that source to change the Wikipedia article, well, there are lots of other Wikipedia articles that need improving, articles where you can find reliable sources as the basis for changes.

Also, thanks for your work on improving Wikipedia. I know that the rules can sometimes be frustrating, but they really are there for a good reason. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm JuneGloom07. I noticed that you recently removed content from Duffy (Casualty) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Each character listed in the significant others section are mentioned and sourced in the article. – JuneGloom07 Talk 23:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Day After Tomorrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balmoral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Maxwell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rebecca (novel), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No need to add every detail about every minor character. That level of detail does not improve the article MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You Rang, M'Lord?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeffrey Holland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brian Murphy, Arthur Kelly and Christine Moore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Would you consider using edit summaries so everyone can understand your edits better. In addition, where you have made changes to character duration dates - where did you get that information from? For instance, I knew Doreen Corkhill's duration was incorrect. I couldn't find a source to change it. I also could not find a source for her last appearance? And where did you get Sinbad's duration from? The character list contains a large amount of redirects to the list itself, redlinks and links needing disambiguation. The list has been tagged now which is bad news.Rain the 1 09:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

No answer yet you carry on adding content to the list. Where are you finding these additional or recurring characters. The list already suffers from no sourcing - it doesn't need countless more unsourced additions.Rain the 1 10:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moment of Truth: Why My Daughter?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Burke.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Knots Landing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tracy Reed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cardiac Arrest (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Healey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Coronation Street characters (1965), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annie Walker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

In Alan Partridge's article you added a series of relatives to the info box. Do they ever appear or are they just mentioned by Alan? Also how do we know for definite that Alan's father's surname was also Partridge? Molly only mentioned that he was named Cyril and died 10 years prior.Rain the 1 19:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Raintheone They're mentioned in conversation between Alan and Molly, and based off cultural and social context of the time - plus Molly's highly traditional views as depicted in the show - I think it unlikely that Alan was born outside of wedlock Clements1997 (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

They were mentioned briefly in a scene but never appeared on-screen. Normally we would not include those characters. I understand his surname probably would have been Partridge but it is still original research.Rain the 1 19:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Ladykillers (1955 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Goodwin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Michael Scott (The Office), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Con O'Neill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dinnerladies (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tunstall and Lesley Nicol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Never the Twain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Christopher Morris and Margaret Courtenay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robin's Nest (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lodge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philomena McDonagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystal Clear.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of unsolved murders in the United Kingdom (before 1970), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Peanuts characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caddy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Lowe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Morecambe & Wise Show.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Clements. I noticed you submitted a list of Brookside characters for creation from 1982, and looking further into it you are creating one for 1983. I already have these sandboxes in my user space. Both with complete and fully updated lists of "Other" characters. I worked on these when the reruns came onto STV. I thought they were a good idea for any original or second year characters who couldn't have a sourced article and some nice original Brookside content. I've purchased so many items for them. I noticed a lot of the information in your 1982 list is using information I've added to characters like Paul, Annabelle, Barry etc - brookside books, 1980s magazines such as TV Guide and Record Mirror and sources I cited back to paywall access to the British Newspaper Archive and Newspapers archive. So I feel a little hard done by that you have used my work without attribution, and I don't think you've done it on purpose but it is still upsetting. So basically I am asking if you would sideline these plans for now until the Brookie project is more further forward on Wiki? I spent so long watching two years worth of credits etc and I feel like you've done something similar.. please get back to me if possible.Rain the 1 20:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication that this oddly specific grouping is notable or meets LISTN. This topic is better covered as a category, not as an article. If this does meet notability, please include reliable sources showing the notability of this subject as a group.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Brookside characters introduced in 1982 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Keaveney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page April Brooks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1892 Thirsk rail crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spitalfields Market.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Clements1997. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Brookside characters introduced in 1982, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of fictional schools, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. The bluelinks you included didn't provide any evidence that the schools you added are considered independently significant. Please provide sources or link to articles or sections of articles that demonstrate that the schools have received real-world attention. DonIago (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:09, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Just a note about [edit, particularly the edit summary in which you stated possible vandalism. Those nicknames are sourced in the article itself. The information in the lead does not need sourcing because it is already sourced in the article.Rain the 1 17:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've undone the edit you made removing the nicknames again. They're sourced in the article. If you have a problem with them being included in the infobox, then I'd advise starting a discussion on the talk page instead of sneakily removing them. Also, please consider using edit summaries as it would be a big help to other editors. - JuneGloom07 Talk 05:04, 25 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lesley Nicol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Lumsden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Levy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:54, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Rothwell, a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Barlow was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Eckersley, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leonard Huxley was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:17, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have removed your additions of episode numbers from Brookside related articles. When making mass changes across numerous articles, you are advised to begin a discussion to gain other editors' opinions. This could be done at WP:SOAPS. Episode numbers are attached to the issue or original research on Wikipedia. Brookside episode numbers on the STV player differ from those that have been readily available on IMDB, which were likely drawn from fansite sources like Brookside soap box etc. Unless we can figure out which source of the episode number is correct, I recommend against using them in the infobox so we do not mislead the general reader.

Another issue is you removing content from the lead sections of articles and stating you have done so because it repeats information from the article itself. The lead is supposed to summarise the article itself. For instance, removing criticism of the character Marie Jackson and leaving only the praise does not adhere to a balanced neutral point of view, which is advised at WP:LEAD. You also removed real world information and concentrated on in-universe Brookside basics.

Also, please consider using edit summaries.Rain the 1 09:56, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Raintheone Why do a majority of the edits I make attract criticism and reversal from you? It feels that everything I do receives a backlash from you, specifically you. I like Brookside and enjoy contributing but having constant criticism from you is beginning to taint it Clements1997 (talk) 10:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

It is not personal, I just challenge non constructive edit patterns. I work well with other editors on Wikipedia. I have offered advice before and received no response. The majority of your edits remain intact - I just reverted your mass changes without consensus. It is positive you enjoy contributing and actually like the show. I like the show too, but I stick within the guidelines in place here.Rain the 1 11:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardwicke House, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Allen was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of unsolved murders in the United Kingdom (before 1970), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Barber, Andrew (7 January 2018). https://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/news/bath-news/brutal-unsolved-victorian-murder-bath-1022905?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target. Retrieved 11 August 2026. {{cite web}}: Check |archive-url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply