User talk:BlueNovember

Requested articles: CompSci/Computing/Internet

User:BlueNovember/Shogi template.

Template_talk:Formal_languages_and_grammars#Catagorisation_of_further_automata

Chess variant

This investigation over this and this edit

Primarily a note to myself, but please message me if you want input and came here from special:link

CgFX

COLLADA FX Cg

up tack

Cutset conditioning

Gupta-Sproull antialiasing

viewport (redirects to window, for some strange reason)

affine case

Chain code

Hough transform

Sentential form

Screener (Parsing). (=Tokeniser/Tokenizer? Ie Lexical_analysis#Tokenizer. )

Attribute (Parsing). Fix Property (programming) and Attribute (computing). (Attribute (computer science) and some redirects?)

Tombstone diagram

Auction_theory#Types_of_auction -> Expand

Continuous double auction, + redirect Continuous double auctions

Simultaneous ascending auction, + redirect Simultaneous ascending auctions

Concurrent MetateM

Gabbay's separation theorem

AAII -> AAII (disambiguation), AAII (agent)

Gaia disambig addition for Gaia (agent)

MAXIMS / Pattie Maes

Conflict deal / The conflict deal +case redirections

Product maximising mechanism

Mixed deal encounter & General mixed deal encounter

Visceral argument

Viscus/Visceral redirect note once above is made

Add derogation rate discussion to Vickery auction.

Monotonic concession protocol

Zeuthen Strategy

Safe Tcl (and update Tcl page)

S1S

Monadic second-order logic -> Partial link in Second-order_logic#Syntax

Minimax

Alpha-beta pruning

Quiescence search, Killer heuristic

Transposition table, Zobrist hashing

Expectiminimax

DHP

Dynamic itemset counting

(Wikipedia:WikiProject Game theory)

Lemke-Howson / Lemke-Howson algorithm

Best response condition - The best response condition says: any i in the support of x must be a pure best response to the mixed strategy y if x is to be a best response against y . An equilibrium (x,y) is given if x is a best response to y and y is a best response to x.source.

Connect4 Perfect play stuff (fhourstone, Valena, Mustrum)

Kuhn’s theorem (a player who has perfect recall can always replace a mixed strategy by an equivalent behaviour strategy)

Perfect recall (Game theory) Player has total recall if all of his nodes in any information set are preceeded by the same set of moves.

Information set (game theory) - Really needs a better picture and a re-write.

Klee-minty cube

Gale evenness condition

Pigou bound

Create Birkbeck College Project.

Stub section in Birkbeck College. Update Andrew Donald Booth accordingly.

See: 1, 2, 3, "A history of Computing Technology, Michael R, 2nd ed, section 8.3.1 page 321".

Link Colossus_computer#Influence_and_fate and Max_Newman#Post-World_War_II

Create Newman's "Computing Machine Laboratory" article. More correctly named "Royal Society Computer Laboratory"?

Contact RC re: IBM Hursley. See also Hursley House.

Add redirects at Hursley Laboratories, Hursley Laboratoratory, etc.

IBM's John Haanstra and his role in the 1401 deployment, GPD's president, and System/360 deployment. Linkify his name in IBM 1401.

Loose coupling / Coupling_(computer_science)

Portal:Technology and applied sciences

Portal:Information technology

Portal:Computer science

Portal:Computer security

Portal:Artificial intelligence

Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games

Category:WikiProject Games

Portal:Constructed languages

Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages

Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Linguistics

Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages/Template

Category:Wikipedia articles with nonstandard pronunciation

Wikipedia:Template_messages#General

{{subst:unsigned}}

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types

• {{Ambox}}, for messageboxes on article pages.
• {{Cmbox}}, for messageboxes on category pages.
• {{Imbox}}, for messageboxes on file (image) pages.
• {{Tmbox}}, for messageboxes on talk pages.
• {{Fmbox}}, for header and footer messageboxes.
• {{Ombox}}, for messageboxes on other types of page.
• {{Mbox}}, for messageboxes that are used in different namespaces and change their presentation accordingly.

Closely related metatemplates:

• {{Article stub box}}, for messageboxes in article stubs.
• {{Dmbox}}, for messageboxes on disambiguation or set-index pages.
• {{Ivmbox}}, a simple full-width box with default ivory background intended to frame important messages or notices.
• {{Hmbox}}

Administrator intervention against vandalism – for quick action in clear cases

Abuse reports – for reporting abusive IP addresses to ISPs

Cleaning up vandalism

Template messages/User talk namespace – a grid of templates that may be used on user talk pages

Vandal Templates

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Icarus Paradox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Icarus Paradox. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rawr, someone kindly restored/expanded the page with citations. Thanks for the heads up anyway. --BlueNovember (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! You indicated an interest in the Klee-Minty cube. A variant of this cube appears as an example on which the Criss-cross algorithm for linear optimization visits all the corners (like Dantzig's simplex algorithm does). The criss-cross article is new, and it has been nominated for Did You Know?. Your comments and suggestions and corrections would be especially valuable. Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 03:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You've done a great job! Very speedy work. I don't think I have anything to add to this variation. --BlueNovember ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:56, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! If the spirit moves you to introduce the KM inequality for 3 dimensions or to generate a graphic, then I would celebrate your contributions.

For a shorter project, maybe you could check whether the updated DYK nomination has been approved?

Thanks again! Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 14:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article Dynamic itemset counting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY, orphan, stub

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 178.2.54.39 (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XConsortium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XConsortium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Percept (information technology) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not contain any sources and fails to establish the notability of the subject by Wikipedia's guidelines. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply