User talk:Based5290

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

	Big K
	Yes, WE are Charlie Kirk in the big 1 AK ❤‍🩹✌ Darer101 (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think charlie kirk is haunting me though this image anyways thanks Based5290 :3 (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

		The Original Barnstar
		Every DYK nominator worries when they see their article hits the main page that suddenly there will be a bunch of edits for it in their watchlist. So imagine my delight to see those edits were your wonderful, public domain images! Thank you for your excellent contributions to Sachio Ashida. I hope this barnstar will serve as a small token of my appreciation. Best, ThaesOfereode (talk) 10:45, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your good article nomination of the article Music torture in the war on terror is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheVoicelessWriter -- TheVoicelessWriter (talk) 06:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your good article nomination of the article Music torture in the war on terror has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheVoicelessWriter -- TheVoicelessWriter (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey, nice photo of Jim Buck (dog walker)! I'd like to upload more photos from old newspapers like this, but I'm still learning the copyright rules. I understand that in the United States, photos taken 1931–1977 are public domain if they were distributed without proper copyright notice, but in this case, how would you check if the Times had attempted to assert copyright? Thanks, and I hope this isn't a dumb question! :-) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's a very good question, actually. The best proof of this would be the original wirephoto lacking a copyright notice (see for example File:Anthony K. Roberts 1974.jpg). At this point, the only possible way that File:Jim Buck walks six dogs in Central Park.jpg would not be public domain would be that the AP inexplicably omitted notice in violation of a contractual obligation with the NYT and risked a lawsuit from the biggest newspaper in the United States. Needless to say, this was unlikely.

Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, there is no copy of the original wirephoto online, so we have to settle for the next best thing: showing that every republication we have access to lacked an individual copyright notice for the photo. In general, when the wirephoto sent out by the AP had a copyright notice, newspapers dutifully reproduced it. For example, this photo of the Kent State massacre had a copyright notice on the original wirephoto. If you look through your newspaper archive of choice, you'll very quickly find that republications included said copyright notice (with newspapers.com, the first two results for this photo [1][2] have the copyright notice, with only the third [3] omitting it). In this case, we assume that the publications without a copyright notice were in violation of some contractual obligation. However, for the Jim Buck photo, literally every republication I found omitted a copyright notice for the photo. The chance of this happening if the original wirephoto had a copyright notice is basically zero. At this point, we essentially revert to the situation discussed in the previous paragraph and conclude that the photo is probably public domain to the extent that it passes c:COM:PCP muster. Based5290 :3 (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Based5290. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "F.D Signifier".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Great addition to Walter Preston Battle. Wikipedia is lucky to have you here. Viriditas (talk) 01:28, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have given you credit for Template:Did you know nominations/Walter Preston Battle. Please consider adding a new hook if you are interested. Otherwise, you will receive credit for this nomination based on your image work alone. Viriditas (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Note, even though you only have seven hooks under your belt, I think you're better at writing hooks than I am, so I'm hoping you will add one. Viriditas (talk) 00:51, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

		The Username Barnstar
		impressive username you've got there. AHR (g • s • c) 03:24, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Are you trying to break the world record for barnstars? You're on your way. Just saw you uploaded a new version of St Paul's Survives back in April after it has been repeatedly deleted by others. You're a star! Viriditas (talk) 00:50, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is in regards to File:Holland House library after an air raid.jpg There are super HQ versions floating around here and there, but they require extraction/editing to upload to commons. I believe I saw one on Getty Images and another on Internet Archive that were amazing. I would have to find you the specific image, but I thought I would run it past you. The current version on Commons is terrible. Viriditas (talk) 00:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Could you possibly dig up links to those high quality versions? I'm having trouble digging up a version which both captures the lighting better and has a similar resolution to the one at Commons. Based5290 :3 (talk) 23:49, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

There's a copy here, but it would be difficult to reconstruct. I forgot to mention that this is a set, as there are many different images from the Holland House library shoot, with the men posing all the same. I will keep looking. Viriditas (talk) 00:17, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

FYI, examples of different images from the Getty set: [4][5][6] Viriditas (talk) 00:24, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply