User talk:Amanda froxy

Hello, Amanda froxy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rosario Citarda, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Comatmebro (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Rosario Citarda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:GNG. Sources provided don't provide significant reliable secondary coverage of the subject. The sources seem cover what he does, but not necessarily why he is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PRehse (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. PRehse (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosario Citarda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosario Citarda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 20:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for creating the article about Red Pecorino, the cheese looks delicious. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Red Pecorino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article adds nothing to the existing article Pecorino.
If kept, substantial copyediting will be required.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Trip n howl, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.bizydalenets.com/this-startup-is-your-one-stop-travel-solution-trip-n-howl/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 22:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Amanda froxy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Trip n howl for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

331dot (talk) 13:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello; thanks for your reply. The page was deleted because it merely told about the company and its offerings. Even if that might be helpful to potential customers, that's considered promotional on Wikipedia and not permitted. Wikipedia articles must do more than merely tell about a company; they must indicate with independent reliable sources how the subject meets notability guidelines, in this case WP:ORG, those for businesses. Those sources must not be associated with or written by the company, and must describe the company in depth and not just be a brief mention, press release, or promotional listing. Please understand that not every company merits a Wikipedia article. If you just want to tell people about companies, you may want to use social media to do so, which is designed for and intended for such a purpose. Wikipedia is not.

If you have independent reliable sources that describe this company in depth, it may be possible to have an article about it here. I would suggest visiting Articles for Creation where you can write a draft that can be submitted for review before being formally placed in the encyclopedia. However, if you don't have appropriate sources and just want to tell about the company, I would respectfully suggest that you not submit a draft at this time. I noticed that the company was described as a "startup". Quite often such "startup" companies take time to gain the appropriate notability to merit an article here. Wikipedia cannot be used to generate notability for a company, it must already be notable. I hope this information has helped you, and if you have further questions, please post them below.

I lastly would ask you if you are associated with this company in any way; certain Wikipedia policies may be applicable to you, depending on your level of association. Thanks 331dot (talk) 17:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Brahmrishi Shree Kumar Swamiji, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 16:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply