User talk:AlwaysAngry

Hello, AlwaysAngry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! __ Just plain Bill (talk) 13:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, post a new help me template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

If you follow the keyboard image all the way to a page by itself, hover over the keys, you'll see the hovered frequency in a pop up. I don't know how to do that in the wiki page. If you can, please change the article.

The page referred to is this: Piano key frequencies — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlwaysAngry (talk • contribs) 20:16, August 8, 2012‎

Hmm. I see the frequencies as title text in the SVG source, but the frequencies don't appear when I hover over the keys. Using an older rev of Firefox here. Hope someone more knowledgeable sees this... __ Just plain Bill (talk) 20:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I can view the frequencies here but not on the page "Piano key frequencies" itself.

Also, please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). --Qwerty Binary (talk) 21:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I get the effect on the standalone page, but it appears that once the image is embedded in a wiki page—even at full-size—the effect no longer displays. I don't believe there's a workaround. If you can find another article with an embedded image that does manage this trick, add another {{help me}} and I (or another editor) will give it another shot. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, AlwaysAngry. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Comparison of Home Owners' and Civic Associations, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SarahStierch (talk) 22:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of homeowner associations and civic associations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of homeowner associations and civic associations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XxTechnicianxX (talk) 02:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply