User talk:2dk

Hello, 2dk and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jemima Goldsmith, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 09:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 2dk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 2dk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Frankie Goes to Hollywood because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can you please expand — why it is inappropriate for an encyclopedia? I have read "Links normally to be avoided" and have not found anything suitable for the case. And by the way, why did you undo the change so swiftly, within seconds? —2dk (talk) 15:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

2dk, links to Youtube videos generally shouldn't be linked right in the middle of articles. Look at an article from Category:YouTube videos for example, and you'll see that they're linked in the external links section at the bottom. Also, I reverted your edit with WP:HUGGLE; that's why it was so quick. Home Lander (talk) 15:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Could you please help me move the link to the appropriate section of the article. Should it be something like *[https://link_address – Video title], that's all? —2dk (talk) 15:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

And how do I link to it correctly "right in the middle of the article", where it is mentioned? — 2dk (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

You can give a link to a youtube video at the end of the article, in the "External links" section, as already mentioned. Alternatively, in the body of the article, you might cite it as a reference/citation like this:<ref>[https://link_address – Video title]</ref>. But you can't 'feature' it. Hope that helps. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

Thank you for your recent pair of excellent edits of our Bruno Bettelheim article, especially this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bruno_Bettelheim&diff=next&oldid=883315680

I've worked on this article off and on, have easily read ten refernces, probably more. And I don't recall a single, solitary mention of any dissertation on Immanuel Kant. So, I went ahead and removed this part.

If the topic interests you and you have the time, please, by all means, feel free to jump in and make future edits. And again, thank you for a good catch. :~) FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 01:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

As a recent contributor to the article, you're invited to a Request for Comment (RfC) discussion. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bruno_Bettelheim#rfc_7DDF8CC

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Languages of Malta, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French and Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Altit Fort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Huns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pirallahı raion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pirallahı (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tony Curran. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@NinjaRobotPirate Please see references at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q711054 — and feel free to contest them, if you think IMDB and Filmportal are bad sources. What you do is, AFAICS, abusing BLPRS rules, which concern controversial or contentious material and not basic biographical data about a living person. Therefore those are not subject to immediate deletion. Won't you find a regular way to contest or challenge information you believe is unreferenced? I'd propose to transfer further discussion to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. — 2dk (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kayvan Novak, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding sloppy infoboxes to articles. Your demographic sources don't work, none of the other data is sourced, and the infoboxes have sytax errors. Please fix them or revert them, but stop adding new ones until you figure out how to do it. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wow, that's rude... They are not sloppier than every other in the same category (Category:Towns_in_Oswego_County,_New_York). I only noticed that four out of 22 towns were missing infoboxes. Don't admonish me, I copied the very same template from Albion, Oswego County, New York (and cannot comprehend why it is sloppy). I transferred all available data from the body of the articles and googled for ZIP and FIPS codes and town websites. The sources concerning area and population are not "mine", they are the same ([1] and [2]) for every other town in NY. (What is wrong?!) I'm sorry if there are some syntax errors, I can't see any. If you do, please feel free to correct them. 2dk (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Country changes in figure skating. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

This one is a judgement call so I won't insist if you want to reinstate. The note that accompanies the file says

I created the two graphical curves with Google's ngram viewer archive copy at the Wayback Machine which generates a bitmap output. With Inkscape, I extracted the two curves from the bitmap and converted them to vector-objects, then I manually re-drew the grid and legends.

I set the ngram viewer to show the incidence of the words "laſt" and "last" in all English documents (including British and American) from 1700 to 1900. I actually entered the words "laft" (with a small-F) and "last" because Google's OCR technology misread the long-s as an "f". This has been corrected by Google since the creation of this picture, so to be able to make a distinction between the two kinds of "s", one has to select one of the 2009 corpora.

The ngram viewer allows the user to examine a sample of documents that were referenced by the search with the target words highlighted. I saw that the apparent minor peaks of short-s usage during 1700-1800 were largely not due to actual short-s usage, but due to the occasional use of a different OCR technology that was able to recognize the long-s as an "s" rather than an "f". This was particularly noticeable when the ngram viewer was set to look at American documents only, which gave unusably uneven curves from 1700-1800, partly because there are not enough American documents from that period to form smooth curves, and because of the usage of the better OCR on about one-third of the American documents from that period.

and I don't know how to express that succinctly.

I think that the article has been trying to use it to answer two questions: (1) when did short s replace long s and (2) can OCR tell the difference between ſ and f. Maybe you are right that question 1 is the more important. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply