User talk:202.9.46.101

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-October_2020-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z-October_2020"],"text":"October 2020","linkableTitle":"October 2020"}-->

October 2020

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-October_2020-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z-October_2020"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z-October_2020","timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-October_2020-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z-October_2020"],"text":"October 2020","linkableTitle":"October 2020"}-->

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 16:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC) [reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z","author":"47.227.95.73","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-47.227.95.73-2020-10-07T16:20:00.000Z-October_2020","replies":[]}}-->

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Edit_warring-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z-Edit_warring"],"text":"Edit warring","linkableTitle":"Edit warring"}-->

Edit warring

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Edit_warring-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z-Edit_warring"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z-Edit_warring","timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Edit_warring-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z-Edit_warring"],"text":"Edit warring","linkableTitle":"Edit warring"}-->

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z","author":"Horse Eye's Back","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:31:00.000Z-Edit_warring","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","replies":["c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion"],"text":"Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion","linkableTitle":"Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion"}-->

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","replies":["c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion","timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","replies":["c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion"],"text":"Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion","linkableTitle":"Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion"}-->

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z","author":"Horse Eye's Back","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Horse_Eye's_Back-2020-10-07T16:34:00.000Z-Notice_of_edit_warring_noticeboard_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-October_2020_2-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z-October_2020_2","c-202.9.46.101-2020-10-07T17:05:00.000Z-October_2020_2","c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z-October_2020_2"],"text":"October 2020","linkableTitle":"October 2020 2"}-->

October 2020

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-October_2020_2-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z-October_2020_2","c-202.9.46.101-2020-10-07T17:05:00.000Z-October_2020_2","c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z-October_2020_2"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z-October_2020_2","timestamp":"2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__3__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-October_2020_2-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z-October_2020_2","c-202.9.46.101-2020-10-07T17:05:00.000Z-October_2020_2","c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z-October_2020_2"],"text":"October 2020","linkableTitle":"October 2020 2"}-->

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z","author":"Ivanvector","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T16:50:00.000Z-October_2020_2","replies":[]}}-->

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

202.9.46.101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ivanvector, I really appreciate you for blocking me so THAT I STOP WIKIPEDIA OF BECOMING A JOKE AND YOU REVERTING MY TALK PAGE TO STOP ALL THESE GOVERNMENT AGENTS DESTROYING YOUR BELOVED WIKIPEDIA BY ENTERING MALICIOUS PROPAGANDA. You really did a service to Wikipedia by blocking me. Wikipedia will truly become more of a joke from now on. 202.9.46.101 (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-07T17:05:00.000Z","author":"202.9.46.101","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-202.9.46.101-2020-10-07T17:05:00.000Z-October_2020_2","replies":[]}}-->

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z","author":"Ivanvector","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ivanvector-2020-10-07T17:10:00.000Z-October_2020_2","replies":[]}}-->

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.