Spring/Summer 1999
Spring/Summer 1999

British fashion designer Alexander McQueen was known throughout his nearly twenty-year career, spanning 1992–2010, for his imaginative, sometimes controversial designs.[1][2][3] The son of a London taxicab driver and a teacher, he grew up in one of the poorer neighbourhoods in London's East End before joining the fashion industry via a Savile Row apprenticeship.[4] In the early stages of McQueen's career, journalists often framed him as a working-class trespasser in an industry that was seen as upper-class, which he found frustrating.[9] McQueen identified with the persecuted and vulnerable, given his homosexuality and difficult upbringing.[10][11][12]
McQueen's personal fixations and interests were a throughline in his career, and he returned to certain ideas and visual motifs repeatedly, especially death and sexuality.[2][13] His fashion shows were theatrical to the point of being performance art.[14][15] For example, in Untitled (Spring/Summer 1998), the show preceding Joan, McQueen had his models walk down a runway made of clear water tanks, then drenched them with artificial rain in the second half.[16][17] Beginning with his graduation collection, Jack the Ripper Stalks His Victims (1992), McQueen appropriated photographs and integrated them into his work. He did so again in Dante (Autumn/Winter 1996), a collection that explored religious motivations for warfare.[18] McQueen continued to explore religion until his final collection, Angels and Demons (Autumn/Winter 2010).[19]
McQueen's collections were both historicist, in that he adapted historical narratives and concepts, and self-referential, in that he revisited and reworked ideas between collections.[2][10] He played with notions of clothing as armour and vice versa, creating high fashion cuirasses sculpted for the female torso.[20][21] Although McQueen primarily designed womenswear, he had featured some menswear in previous collections including The Hunger (Spring/Summer 1996) and Dante.[22][23]
From 1996 to October 2001, McQueen was – in addition to his responsibilities for his own label – head designer at French fashion house Givenchy.[24][25][26] His time at Givenchy was fraught, primarily because of creative differences between him and the label; his early collections there were poorly received.[27][28] McQueen resorted to smoking and drug use to deal with the pressure he felt to satisfy Givenchy management and the fashion press.[28] He became overbearing and temperamental towards those around him, causing his friend Simon Costin to stop working with him before the release of Joan.[29]
Prior to the show, McQueen had been the guest editor for the September 1998 issue of Dazed & Confused.[30][31][32] theme was beauty in disability - "Fashion-Able"[33] "“The idea is to show that beauty comes from within,” McQueen said. “You look at all the mainstream magazines, and it’s all about the beautiful people, all of the time."[33] accused of being sensational[33] Mullins appeared as a model[33] <sub out callahan>

Spring/Summer 1999
Arts and Crafts movement of the 1880s to 1920s[34]
dresses and skirts made of balsa wood[33]
a stitched-up leather breast-plate over lace skirt[33]
a model encased in a thin spiral of stiff Swarovski crystal chains.[33]
27 September 1998 at the Gatliff Road Warehouse in London.[35] ("disused victoria bus station")[33] 2000 attendees[33]
Aimee Mullins walked on wooden prosthetics commissioned by McQueen from artist Bob Watts[33]
Show ended with model Shalom Harlow being spray-painted by robots[34] finale inspired by Rebecca Horn installation High Moon (1991)[34]
Sarah Burton recalled it as one of McQueen's most iconic.[36]
Callahan: "his next one, “No. 13,” would be a masterpiece. He knew it before he staged it."[33] quotes Menkes: "“The triumph of London’s fashion week,” Suzy Menkes said. McQueen captured the raw aggression of Britpop and the swagger¬ ing showmanship of the art scene.”"[33]
McQueen himself recalled it as his best work, later saying it was the only one of his collections to have made him cry.[33]
Callahan suggested that the theme indicated McQueen's dissatisfaction with his career, especially as a Givenchy employee: "“No. 13” was a plain depiction of how he saw himself: hobbled, disabled, a puppet on a pedestal vandalized by automatons."[37]
“Anger in my work reflected angst in my personal life,” he said. “Peo¬ ple saw me comihg to terms with what I was in life: my morbid side, my sexual side. It’s always been about the human psyche. My work is like a biography of my own personality.” -- Anger in my work”: Suzy Menkes, “Mr. Letterhead: McQueen Shows a Corpo¬ rate Side,” New York Times, September 18, 2001.[37]
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.