User:Kodning/Workspace

Status: Research

User:Kodning/Workspace

Lubov Zapolskaya

Status: Research

Russian mathematician (1871–1943)

Portrait of Zapolskaya
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Archived 2020-09-26 at the Wayback Machine
 Yes ~ Yes ~ Maybe
Yes ~ Cites sources – grab those Yes ~ Maybe
viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01003638291?page=110
 ~ Yes No ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Reverse: 1999

Status: Mining

2023 video game

Wordmark
Mining
ID Citation Progress
0 GameLook (2022-05-25). "Yùyuē yònghù dá 150 wàn, 'chóng fǎn wèilái:1999' dàodǐ shì kuǎn zěnyàng de èr cìyuán?" 预约用户达150万，《重返未来:1999》到底是款怎样的二次元？ [With 1.5 million pre-registrations, what kind of anime-style game is Reverse: 1999?]. GameLook (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-01. Reviewing...
1 Xize, Bu (2024-05-20). "Yuánchuàng | 'chóng fǎn wèilái:1999' yī zhōunián: tà shàng jùqíng xiàng èr yóu chéng shén zhī lù" 原创｜《重返未来：1999》一周年：踏上剧情向二游成神之路 [Original | 'Reverse: 1999' 1-year anniversary: embarking on the path to becoming a legend in story-driven 2D games]. Nadianshi (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-01. Reviewing...
2 Shigeta, Yuichi (2023-10-26). "Taimu toraberu RPG 'Ribāsu: 1999' wa sekai kyōkō nado riaru to karameta settei ga miryoku gen bājon sai shūshō made yaru to ikkini hamaru!" タイムトラベルRPG『リバース：1999』は世界恐慌などリアルと絡めた設定が魅力 現バージョン最終章までやると一気にハマる！ [The time-travel RPG 'Reverse: 1999' captivates players with its setting that weaves in real-world events like the great depression; once you play the final chapter of the current version, you'll instantly be hooked!]. IGN (in Japanese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-01. Reviewing...
3 Xunyang (2022-01-10). "'Chóngfǎn Wèilái: 1999' shǒucè kāiqǐ, tā néngfǒu jiǎodòng èrcìyuán shǒuyóu géjú?" 《重返未来：1999》首测开启，它能否搅动二次元手游格局？ [Reverse: 1999 begins first beta test: can it shake up the ACG mobile game space?]. GameRes (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-02-03. Retrieved 2026-07-01. Reviewing...
4 Schpasm (2023-08-11). "Reverse 1999 CBT preview – time not lost on this promising RPG". QooApp. Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-03. Pending
5 Qian, Hongyan (2022-10-25). "Téngxùn huā sān qiān yì mǎi bù liǎo Mǐhāyóu, yúshì tóu le yī pī zhǒngzǐ xuǎnshǒu" 腾讯花3000亿买不了米哈游，于是投了一批种子选手 [Tencent couldn't buy miHoYo with 300 billion, so it invested in a group of promising companies]. CGames (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-03. Pending
6 Torres, Josh (2023-10-20). "Reverse: 1999 interview – crafting a mind-bending time traveling tale with eye-catching character designs". RPG Site. Archived from the original on 2025-11-09. Retrieved 2026-07-03. Pending
7 Astle, Aaron (2024-11-27). "'Unconventional characters' and 'respect for creative freedom' drive Reverse: 1999's $100m success". Pocket Gamer. Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-03. Pending
8 Morris, Iwan (2024-04-01). "Interview: Reverse: 1999's music producer Ricky Lee tells us what makes the audio of the game so special". Pocket Gamer. Archived from the original on 2026-07-01. Retrieved 2026-07-03. Pending
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 Yes Broad ~ Maybe
Yes ~ Official articles considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 Yes From what I can tell from a brief look ~ Maybe
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS Yes ✔ Yes
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 Yes Coverage of beta ~ Maybe
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量. Inconclusive at WP:VG/RS. Doesn't seem obviously bad. Yes Coverage of beta ~ Maybe
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
No Interview Yes WP:VG/RS ~ Useful information about pre-release development ✘ No
No Interview Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
No Interview Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
No Interview Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
No Interview ~ Interviews considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No Ordinary review of beta ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量. Inconclusive at WP:VG/RS. Doesn't seem obviously bad. No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量. Inconclusive at WP:VG/RS. Doesn't seem obviously bad. No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量. Inconclusive at WP:VG/RS. Doesn't seem obviously bad. No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:VG/RS No ✘ No
Yes Yes Authoritative (Bluepoch presumably has a commercial license with Unity) No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
Yes Yes Presumed based on association with CBS and historical reputation. Reliable enough to source HarmonyOS platform support. No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No Probably not ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No Probably not ✘ No
Yes ~ Considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量 No ✘ No
Yes ~ "Game Daily" (游戏日报) considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量; advised to use better sources when available No ✘ No
Yes ~ "Game Daily" (游戏日报) considered reliable by Chinese Wikipedia: w:zh:WikiProject:电子游戏/来源考量; advised to use better sources when available No ✘ No
Yes Yes Authoritative. Unsure if award is noteworthy (listed on Music award) No ✘ No
Yes No WP:VG/RS. Only included as an example of negative reception. Usage would be grasping at straws. No ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.