"The Georgetown reference is good and, I agree, RS. But a single example of a source being cited by RS is insufficient to demonstrate that source is considered
Hayward, Ed. "Prof shocks Northeastern with defense of suicide bomber". Campus Watch. Boston Herald. Retrieved November 28, 2020. A column in an Egyptian weekly newspaper by a Northeastern University professor sparked outrage among his colleagues over the economist's attempt to justify the actions of Palestinian suicide bombers who have slaughtered hundreds of innocent Israelis.
"Here is who repeated an unsupported claim about "a complete cure for cancer in a year", misleading millions on social media". Science Feedback. February 15, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2021. We found that 59 of these articles took the claim reported by the Jerusalem Post at face value. ... Of the 59 articles rated "repeat", Fox News articles stood out, representing 17 articles appearing across various Fox News domains. ... Only 7 articles performed the necessary fact-checking of the claims by seeking experts' feedback or independently checking current scientific evidence. We classified these articles as "fact-checked". These were published by Daily Mail, IFLScience, Wired, Newsweek, Forbes, and the blogs A Science Enthusiast and Science-Based Medicine.
Jaffe-Hoffman, Maayan (February 27, 2020). "Israeli scientists: 'In a few weeks, we will have coronavirus vaccine'". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved November 26, 2020. Once the vaccine is developed, it will take at least 90 days to complete the regulatory process and potentially more to enter the marketplace. Israeli scientists are on the cusp of developing the first vaccine against the novel coronavirus, according to Science and Technology Minister Ofir Akunis. If all goes as planned, the vaccine could be ready within a few weeks and available in 90 days, according to a release.
Dace, Ted (November 2, 2018). "Israel as Irony". CounterPunch.org. Retrieved November 28, 2020. Just over a month later the Jerusalem Post reported on Alam's article under the headline, "US prof justifies Palestinian terror attacks."
"The Georgetown reference is good and, I agree, RS. But a single example of a source being cited by RS is insufficient to demonstrate that source is considered reliable by other reliable sources (plural). If I look hard enough I can find a single example of a RS sourcing Breitbart [108]. I'd typically like to see a potential source be cited by enough RS that it could, itself, pass N if not for the absence of CORPDEPTH. That would usually mean 4-5 recent (i.e. last 12-24 months) examples. That said, I would have no problem using the Bridge Initiative fact sheet in the article directly (assuming it was WP:DUE, of course). Chetsford"
Kristofer J. Petersen-Overton. "Academic Freedom and Palestine: a Personal Account". JSTOR41858670. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.