Home
Quite often authors and editors are linked to their article directly in |author= and |editor= fields, but the article name and displayed part differ. Even more inconsistent if |first= or |last= are linked alone or both to the same target. These links should be placed in the |authorlink= and |editor-link= fields instead. This makes parsing easier, potentially allowing automatic generation of hidden metadata parser/scraper info for external tools, such as, already produced COinS. It also makes potential changes to linking possible from the main citation templates. The bot won't change unpiped links.
If |first= and |last= are set; and |author= and |authorlink= are not set
|first= is a piped1 wikilink and |last= is text
|first= and move to |authorlink=|last= is a piped wikilink and |first= is text
|last= and move to |authorlink=|first= and |last= are piped wikilinks to the same target
|last= and move to |authorlink=If
|author= is set; and |first=, |last=, and |authorlink= are not set
|author= is a piped wikilink to different target|author= and move to |authorlink=The logic is applied to numbered fields as well: |author=, |author1=, |author2= .. |author8=; as well as |editor=, |editor-first=, |editor-last=, |editor-link= group and numbered fields thereof.
|last=[[Smith]] and |first=John, is the target really Smith?Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.