Redirect to:
expanded to include a useful reference: {{dead question|copulation}} -- Ec5618 16:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC) How about ::::{{info|Your question can be answered...
Click to read more »will go away too. -- Ec5618 21:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC) "It is hard to take your petition as anything but a veiled attack." — Ec5618 16 hours left. Ben...
Click to read more »Rebuttals to arguments I have heard too many times: Something is not scientific simply because it makes use of scientific tools. When I use a lowpass filter...
Click to read more »article have the right to decide these things. And don't talk down to me. -- Ec5618 23:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC) I never once said or implied that I "wish to...
Click to read more »//EDIT INTRO SCRIPT function editTopLink() { // if this is preview page or generated page, stop if(document.getElementById("wikiPreview") || window...
Click to read more »blanking of archive pages it appeared vandalous to me, so I reverted. -- Ec5618 21:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC) I don't get it... - CobaltBlueTony 14:10, 27...
Click to read more »/* stop background image from scrolling with content area */ body { background-attachment: fixed; } /* strikeout Upload File link as a reminder to upload...
Click to read more »reversion of that spoiler on The West Wing article [1] have a barnstar. -- Ec5618 For protecting my userpage to discourage vandalism, I award you the RickK...
Click to read more »free to discuss moving the article. Just do it without this template. -- Ec5618 22:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC) First, your common descent move request does...
Click to read more »several times "A quote from the website" Google.com No pressure, though. -- Ec5618 01:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC) Re: this diff, in fact, evolution is not a...
Click to read more »2006 deleted by Doc glasgow 21:14, 29 January 2006 . . Ec5618 20:42, 29 January 2006 . . Ec5618 redirect to Template:User cannibal 23:20, 6 January 2006...
Click to read more »several times "A quote from the website" Google.com No pressure, though. -- Ec5618 01:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC) Jim, I'm also responding to you here, mainly...
Click to read more »behaviour, an Admin can be stripped of his rights instead, or additionally. -- Ec5618 17:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC) The first has been proposed previously (I think...
Click to read more »Colour: Vibrant Wikipedian This Wikipedian was graded by: RoyBoy, Guettarda, KillerChihuahua, WAS 4.250, Jim62sch, Samsara, Dragons flight and Ec5618....
Click to read more »please reconsider your vote (or at least your reasoning). Thank you. -- Ec5618 14:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC) I'm a bit backlogged right now, but yes I can...
Click to read more »on us to assist you. – RoyBoy, KillerChihuahua, Parallel or Together?, Ec5618, dave souza, Dunc, Bill Jefferys, Guettarda, Jim62sch, WAS 4.250, Plumbago...
Click to read more »adminship/Eagle 101 Requests for adminship/Earth Requests for adminship/Ec5618 Requests for adminship/Echo myself Requests for adminship/Ed Poor Requests...
Click to read more »4757 Celithemis 6710 4758 Priyanath 6705 4759 Flymeoutofhere 6705 4760 Ec5618 6704 4761 Michael David 6702 4762 A Softer Answer 6701 4763 Cunard 6698...
Click to read more »Opark 77 (talk · contribs) 5690 Oliver Pereira (talk · contribs) (Admin) 5687 Ec5618 (talk · contribs) 5684 Bookofjude (talk · contribs) (Admin) 5681 SEWilcoBot (talk ·...
Click to read more »October 2005 (UTC) PI: It took so long that is why I said so. Fine now. Ec5618 is quite right althogh not perfect. Logic can be used to prove the existence...
Click to read more »D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 41 19 6 68% 08:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 4 Ec5618 14 9 6 61% 19:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 5 Cantthinkofagoodname 50 0 1 100%...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Well, it seems nobody finds the name offensive then. Good. -- Ec5618 16:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC) I just wanted to say that this thread is starting...
Click to read more »D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 41 19 6 68% 08:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 4 Ec5618 14 9 6 61% 19:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 5 Cantthinkofagoodname 50 0 1 100%...
Click to read more »wishes to state his case in another way, ve should be free to do so. -- Ec5618 12:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC) I think as Radiant points out, we can call...
Click to read more »but if they succeed, there's very little to actually being an Admin. -- Ec5618 21:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Nah, I have a hate crowd. I actually know better...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/East718 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ec5618 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ed Poor Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ed...
Click to read more »of the RCC. ;) Jim62sch 22:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC) ..Show-offs. -- Ec5618 23:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Ah weel, Timor mortis conturbat me as in Lament...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/East718 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ec5618 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ed Poor Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ed...
Click to read more »talk:Ebyabe/Archive 30 User talk:Ebyabe/Archive 31 User talk:Ebyabe/Archive 32 User talk:Ec5618/Human User talk:Ecpiandy/Archive 6 User talk:Ed!/3 User talk:EdJohnston/Archive...
Click to read more »"Ebubechukwu1":1,"Ebutaljib":1,"Ebyabe":1,"Ebyitems":1,"Ebz123":1,"Ec1801011":1,"Ec5618":1,"Ecad93":1,"Ecal saputra":1,"Ecallow":1,"Ecangola":1,"Ecbf":1,"Eccekevin":1...
Click to read more »February 2006 19 20 17 US 56 Cantthinkofagoodname 6 February 2006 58 0 1 S 59 Ec5618 6 February 2006 15 11 5 NC 31 Matt Yeager 6 February 2006 37 16 5 NC 58...
Click to read more »09:41 2006-12-30 22:21 7 4575 Talk:Irreducible complexity/Archive 3 15 To Ec5618 2006-12-28 13:34 2007-01-07 17:10 13 9383 Talk:Irreducible complexity/Archive...
Click to read more »self-nominating, always it seems a risky approach towards adminship." -- Ec5618 03:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Yes I did say that. A reflection of my observation...
Click to read more »21:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Indeed. Twisted humour. I agree with you both. -- Ec5618 21:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC) The problem is that the moment it officially becomes...
Click to read more »"WikiTimmy": 1, "ContentEditman": 1, "LLMHoopes": 1, "T.X.Critter": 1, "Ec5618": 1, "Chindhakan": 1, "Rimmel.Edits": 1, "Fmrsmt": 1, "EspinosaLuisJr1791":...
Click to read more »09:41 2006-12-30 22:21 7 4575 Talk:Irreducible complexity/Archive 3 15 To Ec5618 2006-12-28 13:34 2007-01-07 17:10 13 9383 Talk:Irreducible complexity/Archive...
Click to read more »withdrawn by bureaucrat The Fish, 7 February 2006 - withdrawn by bureaucrat Ec5618, 6 February 2006 - consensus not reached Genisock2 (sockpuppet of Geni)...
Click to read more »sources. Association of American Feed Control Officials: PROD; notified Ec5618 (talk · contribs) 23:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC) Reason: No indication of how...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive92 78 User:McSly and User:Ec5618 reported by User:Okmjui2000 (Result: Plaintiff blocked 24h) 2009-03-06 06:26...
Click to read more »03:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Sprmadhothunnies -- 03:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Ec5618 -- 03:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Theone00 -- 03:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Tuspm...
Click to read more »"Ntnon", "PatriceNeff", "Royce", "Pascal", "Disdero", "Victor Engel", "Ec5618", "Universimmedia", "WolfgangRieger", "Dying", "Marknen", "Jonadab~enwiki"...
Click to read more »"Ntnon", "PatriceNeff", "Royce", "Pascal", "Disdero", "Victor Engel", "Ec5618", "Universimmedia", "WolfgangRieger", "Dying", "Marknen", "Jonadab~enwiki"...
Click to read more »