User:DissidentAggressor

This is an alternative account of Toddst1.

This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DissidentAggressor.

I am here to build an encyclopedia.

A nod to the heavy metal band Judas Priest whose song Dissident Aggressor was released on Sin After Sin in 1977. The song later won the 2010 Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance after being released again on A Touch of Evil: Live.^[1]

Please don't use a present participle to describe something that occurred in the past. It is incorrect. You should use the eponymous past tense.

Many editors seem to have difficulty making a declarative statement. If you're tempted to use the word "actually" you're probably looking at it. In 99% of the cases, that word adds no meaning. Please don't use it.

Example

Many editors actually seem to have difficulty actually making a declarative statement. If you're actually tempted to use the word "actually" you're actually probably looking at it. Actually, in 99% of the cases, that word actually adds no meaning. Please don't actually use it.

Others

Other adverbs similarly abused are:

• definitely
• totally
• really
• really, really
• super

In general, please don't abuse adverbs.

Paid editors on Wikipedia are IMHO the biggest threat to Wikipedia. These are professionals who are paid to "spin" Wikipedia articles.

A person accepting financial compensation from a third party is placing himself in the following conundrum:

• If they are not willing and able to present the totality of properly encyclopedic material about their client, warts and all, with a truly fair-minded ability to give proper weight to material which may be inimical to their client's interests, or support the inclusion of such material when appropriate, then they should not be editing Wikipedia.
• And if they are, their client should fire them.
• And in either case, they are acting unethically.

As of the writing of this section, there are 4,600 folks who self-identify as Category:Connected contributors. Not all of them are paid, but the ones who are, IMHO have no place on this project. Unfortunately, current policy hasn't (yet) dealt effectively with this problem.

They're professionals making their living on the backs of the volunteers on this project, manipulating how their clients are perceived on Wikipedia and they're professionals at manipulating wiki-politics and gaming the system.

Please be on the lookout for articles that this these editors have polluted and join me in attempting to keep Wikipedia articles honest.

See also

• Wikipedia:Paid editing (essay)
• WP:PAIDWATCH

This user is a member of the Integrity Project

Category:Wikipedia nobodys