User:Corrector623

Just trying to correct some glaring holes, like extremely prominent people and organizations in Atlantic Canada with no coverage at all, and strange holes in th

Just trying to correct some glaring holes, like extremely prominent people and organizations in Atlantic Canada with no coverage at all, and strange holes in the redirect coverage of important processes (collective intelligence, mass peer review) with unclear scope.

Also why would linking to the official Twitter page for an organization, with the same name as the organization, be undone? Twitter has become part of the mainstream and it's constantly advertised. Wikipedia should be a reliable source on which Twitter address is the "real" Oprah or whatever...

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.