User:Collect/ACE2019
These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion.
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. |
 | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
Questions from Collect
- Ought Arbitrators who have been personally involved in any way concerning the facts of a case recuse themselves from any related cases?
- Ought the persons named in a case be given sufficient time to answer charges made by others, rather than have each be given the same time limits?
- When an arbitrator proffers specific evidence on their own, ought the accused be permitted to actually reply to such "new evidence" as though it were timely presented, with the same time allowed for such a response?
My ratings are in regard to the answers given to these questions, and only these questions and answers. I would note that I have no "grudge lists" at any time, and never have. And I have opposed RfAs for a person and then supported the same person in ACE - I honestly treat every encounter as though it were my first.
Net results (not necessarily in alphabetical order
A Maxim, Hawkeye7, Brady, LaserBrain, Kudpung
B Xeno, Llywrch, NYB, TRM, DavidFuchs, SoWhy, RichWales, WTT, BarKeep, Thryduulf
C DGG, Enterprisey, Beeblebrox, Gadfium, Casliber
Fail Calidum (no answers), KrakatoaKatie, Isarra.
An above-average group, in fact, overall.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.