User:Collect/ACE2017

These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion.

User:Collect/ACE2017

Questions from Collect

  1. Should the existence of a "case" imply that the committee should inevitably impose "sanctions"?
  2. If an administrator has openly stated a strong aversion to an editor's article edits on that editor's talk page, is that sufficient to indicate that the administrator is no longer impartial concerning that editor?
  3. a. In cases where the person involved in a case is actually out of the country during that case, ought there be a delay to give that editor sufficient time to address "new evidence"?
    b. Where multiple editors present evidence against such a person, ought space and time for rebuttal be given?
    c. Where evidence is added at the last minute, should the clock be stopped to allow actual time to rebut the last-minute evidence?
    d. Under what circumstance, if any, should arbitrators be allowed to present evidence in the proposed decision which was not previously presented by anyone else?


The grades assign equal weight to the first two, and double weight to the third. I am not making editorial comments about specific answers, and not making comments about candidates. Nor are the grades related to any other questions asked.

Candidate Grade
Premeditated Chaos A Recommend
The Rambling Man A Recommend
SMcCandlish A- Recommend
BU Rob13 A- Recommend
Callanecc B+ Pass
Alex Shih B+ Pass
Sir Joseph B Pass
Worm That Turned B Pass
Krakatoa Katie B Pass
RickinBaltimore B Pass
SarekOfVulcan B- Pass Withdrawn
Mailer Diablo C- Low Pass
A Den Jentyl... D Fail Disqualified
Opabinia regalis D- Fail

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.