User:Alicejenny

I'm Alice-Jennifer, a Brianist and a Bright.

I live at Discovery Bay, Hong Kong and travel a lot as I work for an airline.

I'm black. I'm 43 and have a wonderful family with 2 kids.

As far as I can determine, it seems the title CREEPY, like MAD was always in upper case. If that's the case, then both presumably both the name in the article and the name of the article should be the same. Do you agree, or am I wrong?--Alicejenny 07:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Greetings to a fellow parent of 2 kids!

That's a good question. I've only been capitalizing Mad since that's the way it seems to have been established on Wikipedia for some time now and it didn't seem worth fighting, even I've never seen in that way anywhere else.

As for Creepy, I've only seen it upper- and lowercase in all references sources, including the definitive Warren Publishing history at http://enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Warren%20Magazines.htm , in the big 2003 Warren feature story in The Comics Journal (http://www.tcj.com/253/n_warren.html), one of the leading comics magazines, and elsewhere. Since the logos themselves change -- it was "The Fantastic Four" upper and lower until it became "THE FANTASTIC FOUR" for a while in the '70s, for example -- I tend to go with the style of the majority of reference sources unless, say, the publisher were quoted as saying it were an acronym or something like that. The analogy to this might be the producer of the TV show "thirtysomething" or the poet "e.e. cummings," who both made a specific point that their title/name should be lowercased, and that's how most reference sources list them.

Was this a help? Let me know! Thanks! -- Tenebrae 07:29, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Sound fair enough to me. I agree better to stick with the lower case. --Alicejenny 07:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

I left a response to the question you raised on the Battle of Falkirk talk page. Regards

Rcpaterson 08:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)