Ukraine – Forward! (Ukrainian: Україна – Вперед!, Ukrajina – Vpered!, Russian: Украина — Вперёд!) is a social democratic[1][4][5]political party in Ukraine. From its registration in December 1998[3] until March 2012 it was named Ukrainian Social Democratic Party.[2] The party has, according to official figures, about 86,000 party members.[4] The official name of the party is: Party of Natalia Korolevska "Ukraine – Forward!" (Ukrainian: Партію Наталії Королевської "Україна - Вперед!", Russian: Партию Натальи Королевской "Украина — Вперёд!")[6][7]
Ukraine – Forward! is commonly seen in Ukraine as a pro-business party and as representing corporate interests, although during the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych and throughout Euromaidan, the party also campaigned for Yulia Tymoshenko's release from jail.[15]
History
Party of Human Rights
The party traces its history back to 1994 when the Minister of Justice of Ukraine Vasyl Onopenko created his party, Party of Human Rights, which in January 1995 has united with the Social Democratic Party of Ukraine and the Ukrainian Party of Justice, later named as the Social Democratic Party of Ukraine (united). Onopenko became famous for leaving the office of Minister of Justice in protest to the events of 1995 connected with the burial of the Patriarch Volodymyr and became known as the Black Tuesday. A major break up of the party took place in 1998, after which Onopenko once again created a new party.
During the parliamentary elections on 26 March 2006 the party also took part in the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc.[3] Out of 129 seats won by the bloc only eight were given to members of the Ukrainian Social Democratic Party.
In the parliamentary elections on 30 September 2007, the party was again part of the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc.,[3] that won 156 out of 450 seats. Again the party only received eight seats in parliament.
Party leader Korolevska was expelled from the “Bloc Yulia Tymoshenko-Batkivshchyna”-faction (formerly BYuT faction) in the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) on 14 March 2012.[20] The same day the party stated on its official website "We are deeply shocked and outraged by the betrayal of the leadership of the faction "Bloc Yulia Tymoshenko-Batkivschyna".[21] These events also made the party leave the Dictatorship Resistance Committee.[20][21] But it assured it was still "in opposition to the current regime, the Yanukovych regime".[21][22] On 15 March 2012 the Ukrainian Social Democratic Party was expelled from the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc for alleged "cooperation with the presidential administration and the ruling regime".[23]
On 22 March 2012 party congress the party was renamed Party of Natalia Korolevska "Ukraine – Forward!" (Ukrainian: Партію Наталії Королевської "Україна - Вперед!", Russian: Партию Натальи Королевской "Украина – Вперёд!"), known in short as Ukraine – Forward!.[6][7] Former members of Korolevska's old party All-Ukrainian Union "Fatherland" have joined the renamed party since.[25] In June 2012 the party stated it would not cooperate with the Party of Regions in a new parliament.[26]
Results in the 2012 elections
The party did participate in the October 2012 parliamentary elections.[6] In March 2012 the parties popularity in opinion polls had reached a level far below above the election threshold (which was raised to 5% in November 2011[27]) with about 1% of the votes predicted to go to the party but in May 2012 the prediction had increased from 1% to 3.8%.[28][29][30] Experts believed the party was gaining potential voters from former supporters of Sergiy Tigipko and his Strong Ukraine.[31] Famed Ukrainian footballerAndriy Shevchenko joined the party immediately after his retirement in July 2012;[8][15] he took second place on the party list for the October 2012 parliamentary elections.[31] During the campaign for this election the party was one of the biggest spenders.[5][31] The party official reported it had spent US$7.6 million on the election campaign in multi-member constituencies.[32] Political scientist Artem Bidenko estimated that the party had spent some US$150 million on the campaign.[33] In June 2012 the party was advertising on 320 billboards in Kyiv alone and on 900 across Ukraine.[5] One of their election billboards claimed that “an average wage of 1,000 euros and a pension of 500 euros” was realistic for Ukraine (the monthly average wage was €300 at the time).[34] An elaborate pre-election campaign for the 2012 Ukrainian parliamentary elections was carried out with massive use of television , in particular promotional videos , external media , press and even polls .
The election campaign of the "Ukraine — Forward!" party, according to experts' estimates as a result of monitoring outdoor and television advertising, cost 150-200 million US dollars. The party filed a lawsuit against the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) and the "Democratic Initiatives" foundation for publishing the results of a joint sociological survey, which specifically indicated that 2.1% of voters in 2012 were ready to vote for the party, arguing the number was much higher. In an interview conducted in Russian (the party’s primary language until 2014) with Kommersant’s Ukraine correspondent, Party leader Natalia Korolevska stated:
«—
Социологические войны ведутся перед каждыми выборами, но такого, как сейчас, еще никогда не было. И поэтому мы, получив данные внутренних опросов, которые подтвердили наш результат в 7%, решили судиться. Мы считаем, что это поможет избежать манипуляции. Социология манипулирует мнением людей и является одним из элементов фальсификации выборов — людям заранее навязывают сфабрикованный результат.
— Если выборы покажут, что ваш рейтинг гораздо ниже 7%, вы отзовете свой иск к КМИС и фонду "Демократические инициативы"? — Мы не будем отзывать иск, поскольку точно знаем, что их исследование не проводилось. А выборы покажут, что наш рейтинг — 10%!
»
("- Sociological wars are conducted before every election, but there has never been anything like this before. That is why after having received the data of the internal opinion polls, which confirmed our 7% of the votes, we decided to take legal action. We think this will help us avoid manipulation. Sociology manipulates people's opinion and is one of the elements of election fraud - people are foisted a fabricated result on them in advance.
- If the elections show that your rating is much lower than 7%, will you withdraw your lawsuit against KMIS and the Democratic Initiatives Fund?
- We will not withdraw the lawsuit because we know for a fact that their study was not conducted. And the election will show that our rating is 10%!")
However, in the election, despite its vast and widely criticised spending on promotion, the party won 1.58% of the national votes and no constituencies (it had competed in 105 constituencies[35]) and thus failed to win parliamentary representation.[9][10] On 11 October 2012 the party had filed a lawsuit at Kyiv's economic court against the Democratic Initiatives Foundation and Kyiv International Institute of Sociology with a demand that they retract their reports about the low rating of the party; on 29 November 2012 the party revoked this lawsuit.[9]
During the campaign for the 2012 Ukrainian parliamentary election the party promised to relieve small and medium business to the maximum possible extent, “an active part of a fair and efficient state”, “securing social justice and high social standards”, “more welfare” and counteraction against “societal rifts along cultural, linguistic, religious and national lines” and they committed to introduce “total citizen control on all government levels”.[5]
Elections
Presidential since 1999 (year links to election page)
