Tests of relativistic energy and momentum

Kinetic energy in special relativity and Newtonian mechanics. Relativistic kinetic energy increases to infinity when approaching the speed of light, thus no massive body can reach this speed.

Tests of relativistic energy and momentum are aimed at measuring the relativistic expressions for energy, momentum, and mass. According to special relativity, the properties of particles moving approximately at the speed of light significantly deviate from the predictions of Newtonian mechanics. For instance, the speed of light cannot be reached by massive particles.^[1]

Today, those relativistic expressions for particles close to the speed of light are routinely confirmed in undergraduate laboratories, and necessary in the design and theoretical evaluation of collision experiments in particle accelerators.^[2][3] See also Tests of special relativity for a general overview.

Overview

Similar to kinetic energy, relativistic momentum increases to infinity when approaching the speed of light.

In classical mechanics, kinetic energy and momentum are expressed as

${\displaystyle E_{k}={\tfrac {1}{2}}mv^{2},\quad p=mv.\,}$

On the other hand, special relativity predicts that the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of references. The relativistic energy–momentum relation reads:

${\displaystyle E^{2}-(pc)^{2}=(mc^{2})^{2}\,}$,

from which the relations for rest energy ${\displaystyle E_{0}}$, relativistic energy (rest + kinetic) ${\displaystyle E}$, kinetic energy ${\displaystyle E_{k}}$, and momentum ${\displaystyle p}$ of massive particles follow:

${\displaystyle E_{0}=mc^{2},\quad E=\gamma mc^{2},\quad E_{k}=(\gamma -1)mc^{2},\quad p=\gamma mv}$,

where ${\displaystyle \gamma =1/{\sqrt {1-(v/c)^{2}}}}$. So relativistic energy and momentum significantly increase with speed, thus the speed of light cannot be reached by massive particles. In some relativity textbooks, the so-called "relativistic mass" ${\displaystyle M=\gamma m\,}$ is used as well. However, this concept is considered disadvantageous by many authors, instead the expressions of relativistic energy and momentum should be used to express the velocity dependence in relativity, which provide the same experimental predictions.

Early experiments

Main article: Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments

First experiments capable of detecting such relations were conducted by Walter Kaufmann, Alfred Bucherer and others between 1901 and 1915. These experiments were aimed at measuring the deflection of beta rays within a magnetic field so as to determine the mass-to-charge ratio of electrons. Since the charge was known to be velocity independent, any variation had to be attributed to alterations in the electron's momentum or mass (formerly known as transverse electromagnetic mass ${\displaystyle m_{T}=m\gamma ,}$ equivalent to the "relativistic mass" ${\displaystyle M}$ as indicated above). Since relativistic mass is not often used anymore in modern textbooks, those tests can be described of measurements of relativistic momentum or energy, because the following relation applies:

${\displaystyle {\frac {M}{m}}={\frac {p}{mv}}={\frac {E}{mc^{2}}}=\gamma }$

Electrons traveling between 0.25–0.75c indicated an increase of momentum in agreement with the relativistic predictions, and were considered as clear confirmations of special relativity. However, it was later pointed out that although the experiments were in agreement with relativity, the precision was not sufficient to rule out competing models of the electron, such as the one of Max Abraham.^[4][5]

Already in 1915, however, Arnold Sommerfeld was able to derive the Fine structure of hydrogen-like spectra by using the relativistic expressions for momentum and energy (in the context of the Bohr–Sommerfeld theory). Subsequently, Karl Glitscher simply substituted the relativistic expression's for Abraham's, demonstrating that Abraham's theory is in conflict with experimental data and is therefore refuted, while relativity is in agreement with the data.^[6]

Precision measurements

Three data points of Rogers et al., in agreement with special relativity

In 1940, Rogers et al. performed the first electron deflection test sufficiently precise to definitely rule out competing models. As in the Bucherer-Neumann experiments, the velocity and the charge-mass-ratio of beta particles of velocities up to 0.75c was measured. However, they made many improvements, including the employment of a Geiger counter. The accuracy of the experiment by which relativity was confirmed was within 1%.^[7]

An even more precise electron deflection test was conducted by Meyer et al. (1963). They tested electrons traveling at velocities from 0.987 to 0.99c, which were deflected in a static homogenous magnetic field by which p was measured, and a static cylindrical electric field by which ${\displaystyle p^{2}/(m\gamma )}$ was measured. They confirmed relativity with an upper limit for deviations of ~0.00037.^[8]

Also measurements of the charge-to-mass ratio and thus momentum of protons have been conducted. Grove and Fox (1953) measured 385-MeV protons moving at ~0.7c. Determination of the angular frequencies and of the magnetic field provided the charge-to-mass ratio. This, together with measuring the magnetic center, allowed to confirm the relativistic expression for the charge-to-mass ratio with a precision of ~0.0006.^[9]

However, Zrelov et al. (1958) criticized the scant information given by Grove and Fox, emphasizing the difficulty of such measurements due to the complex motion of the protons. Therefore, they conducted a more extensive measurement, in which protons of 660 MeV with mean velocity of 0.8112c were employed. The proton's momentum was measured using a Litz wire, and the velocity was determined by evaluation of Cherenkov radiation. They confirmed relativity with an upper limit for deviations of ~0.0041.^[10]

Bertozzi experiment

Data of the Bertozzi experiment show close agreement with special relativity. Kinetic energy of five electron runs: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4.5, 15 MeV (or 1, 2, 3, 9, 30 in mc²). Speed: 0.752, 0.828, 0.922, 0.974, 1.0 in c² (or 0.867, 0.910, 0.960, 0.987, 1 in c).

Since the 1930s, relativity was needed in the construction of particle accelerators, and the precision measurements mentioned above clearly confirmed the theory as well. But those tests demonstrate the relativistic expressions in an indirect way, since many other effects have to be considered in order to evaluate the deflection curve, velocity, and momentum. So an experiment specifically aimed at demonstrating the relativistic effects in a very direct way was conducted by William Bertozzi (1962, 1964).^[11][12]

He employed the electron accelerator facility at MIT in order to initiate five electron runs, with electrons of kinetic energies between 0.5 and 15 MeV. These electrons were produced by a Van de Graaff generator and traveled a distance of 8.4 m, until they hit an aluminium disc. First, the time of flight of the electrons was measured in all five runs – the velocity data obtained were in close agreement with the relativistic expectation. However, at this stage the kinetic energy was only indirectly determined by the accelerating fields. Therefore, the heat produced by some electrons hitting the aluminium disc was measured by calorimetry in order to directly obtain their kinetic energy - those results agreed with the expected energy within 10% error margin.

Undergraduate experiments

Various experiments have been performed which, due to their simplicity, are still used as undergraduate experiments. Mass, velocity, momentum, and energy of electrons have been measured in different ways in those experiments, all of them confirming relativity.^[13] They include experiments involving beta particles, Compton scattering in which electrons exhibit highly relativistic properties and positron annihilation.

Beta particles Marvel et al.[13] 2011 Lund et al.[14] 2009 Luetzelschwab[15] 2003 Couch et al.[16] 1982 Geller et al.[17] 1972 Parker[18] 1972 Bartlett et al.[19] 1965

Compton recoil electrons Jolivette et al.[20] 1994 Hoffman[21] 1989 Egelstaff et al.[22] 1981 Higbie[23] 1974

Positron annihilation Dryzek et al.[24] 2006

Particle accelerators

In modern particle accelerators at high energies, the predictions of special relativity are routinely confirmed, and are necessary for the design and theoretical evaluation of collision experiments, especially in the ultrarelativistic limit.^[3] For instance, time dilation must be taken into account to understand the dynamics of particle decay, and the relativistic velocity addition theorem explains the distribution of synchrotron radiation. Regarding the relativistic energy-momentum relations, a series of high precision velocity and energy-momentum experiments have been conducted, in which the energies employed were necessarily much higher than the experiments mentioned above.^[25]

Velocity

Time of flight measurements have been conducted to measure differences in the velocities of electrons and light at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. For instance, Brown et al. (1973) found no difference in the time of flight of 11-GeV electrons and visible light, setting an upper limit of velocity differences of ${\displaystyle \Delta v/c=(-1.3\pm 2.7)\times 10^{-6}}$.^[26] Another SLAC experiment conducted by Guiragossián et al. (1974) accelerated electrons up to energies of 15 to 20.5 GeV. They used a radio frequency separator (RFS) to measure time-of-flight differences and thus velocity differences between those electrons and 15-GeV gamma rays on a path length of 1015 m. They found no difference, increasing the upper limit to ${\displaystyle \Delta v/c=2\times 10^{-7}}$.^[27]

Already before, Alväger et al. (1964) at the CERN Proton Synchrotron executed a time of flight measurement to test the Newtonian momentum relations for light, being valid in the so-called emission theory. In this experiment, gamma rays were produced in the decay of 6-GeV pions traveling at 0.99975c. If Newtonian momentum ${\displaystyle p=mv}$ were valid, those gamma rays should have traveled at superluminal speeds. However, they found no difference and gave an upper limit of ${\displaystyle \Delta v/c=10^{-5}}$.^[28]

Energy and Calorimetry

The intrusion of particles into particle detectors is connected with electron–positron annihilation, Compton scattering, Cherenkov radiation etc., so that a cascade of effects is leading to the production of new particles (photons, electrons, neutrinos, etc.). The energy of such particle showers corresponds to the relativistic kinetic energy and rest energy of the initial particles. This energy can be measured by calorimeters in an electrical, optical, thermal, or acoustical way.^[29]

Thermal measurements in order to estimate the relativistic kinetic energy were already carried out by Bertozzi as mentioned above. Additional measurements at SLAC followed, in which the heat produced by 20-GeV electrons was measured in 1982. A beam dump of water-cooled aluminium was employed as calorimeter. The results were in agreement with special relativity, even though the accuracy was only 30%.^[30] However, the experimentalists alluded to the fact, that calorimetric tests with 10-GeV electrons were executed already in 1969. There, copper was used as beam dump, and an accuracy of 1% was achieved.^[31]

In modern calorimeters called electromagnetic or hadronic depending on the interaction, the energy of the particle showers is often measured by the ionization caused by them. Also excitations can arise in scintillators (see scintillation), whereby light is emitted and then measured by a scintillation counter. Cherenkov radiation is measured as well. In all of those methods, the measured energy is proportional to the initial particle energy.^[29]

Annihilation and pair production

Relativistic energy and momentum can also be measured by studying processes such as annihilation and pair production.^[2] For instance, the rest energy of electrons and positrons is 0.51 MeV respectively. When a photon interacts with an atomic nucleus, electron-positron pairs can be generated in case the energy of the photon matches the required threshold energy, which is the combined electron-positron rest energy of 1.02 MeV. However, if the photon energy is even higher, then the exceeding energy is converted into kinetic energy of the particles. The reverse process occurs in electron-positron annihilation at low energies, in which process photons are created having the same energy as the electron-positron pair. These are direct examples of ${\displaystyle E_{0}=mc^{2}}$ (mass–energy equivalence).

There are also many examples of conversion of relativistic kinetic energy into rest energy. In 1974, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory accelerated electrons and positrons up to relativistic velocities, so that their relativistic energy ${\displaystyle \gamma mc^{2}}$ (i.e. the sum of their rest energy and kinetic energy) is significantly increased to about 1500 MeV each. When those particles collide, other particles such as the J/ψ meson of rest energy of about 3000 MeV were produced.^[32] Much higher energies were employed at the Large Electron–Positron Collider in 1989, where electrons and positrons were accelerated up to 45 GeV each, in order to produce W and Z bosons of rest energies between 80 and 91 GeV. Later, the energies were considerably increased to 200 GeV to generate pairs of W bosons.^[33] Such bosons were also measured using proton-antiproton annihilation. The combined rest energy of those particles amounts to approximately 0.938 GeV each. The Super Proton Synchrotron accelerated those particle up to relativistic velocities and energies of approximately 270 GeV each, so that the center of mass energy at the collision reaches 540 GeV. Thereby, quarks and antiquarks gained the necessary energy and momentum to annihilate into W and Z bosons.^[34]

Many other experiments involving the creation of a considerable amount of different particles at relativistic velocities have been (and still are) conducted in hadron colliders such as Tevatron (up to 1 TeV), the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (up to 200 GeV), and most recently the Large Hadron Collider (up to 7 TeV) in the course of searching for the Higgs boson.

Nuclear reactions

The relation ${\displaystyle E_{0}=mc^{2}}$ can be tested in nuclear reactions, as the percent differences between the masses of the reactants and the products are big enough to measure; the change in total mass should account for the change in total kinetic energy. Einstein proposed such a test in the paper where he first stated the equivalence of mass and energy, mentioning the radioactive decay of radium as a possibility.^[35] The first test in a nuclear reaction, however, used the absorption of an incident proton by lithium-7, which then breaks into two alpha particles. The change in mass corresponded to the change in kinetic energy to within 0.5%.^[36][37]

A particularly sensitive test was carried out in 2005 in the gamma decay of excited sulfur and silicon nuclei, in each case to the non-excited state (ground state). The masses of the excited and ground states were measured by measuring their revolution frequencies in an electromagnetic trap. The gamma rays' energies were measured by measuring their wavelengths with gamma-ray diffraction, similar to X-ray diffraction, and using the well-established relation between photon energy and wavelength. The results confirmed the predictions of relativity to a precision of 0.0000004.^[38][39]

References

1. Cosimo Bambi; Alexandre D. Dolgov (2015). Introduction to Particle Cosmology: The Standard Model of Cosmology and its Open Problems (illustrated ed.). Springer. p. 24. ISBN 978-3-662-48078-6. Extract of page 24
2. Edwin F. Taylor; John Archibald Wheeler (1992). Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity. New York: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-2327-1.
3. Plettner, Tomas; Byer, Robert L.; Siemann, Robert H. (2005), "The impact of Einstein's theory of special relativity on particle accelerators", Journal of Physics B, 38 (9): S741 – S752, Bibcode:2005JPhB...38S.741P, doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/9/020, S2CID 53334246
4. Zahn, C. T. & Spees, A. A. (1938), "A Critical Analysis of the Classical Experiments on the Variation of Electron Mass", Physical Review, 53 (7): 511–521, Bibcode:1938PhRv...53..511Z, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.53.511
5. P. S. Faragó & L. Jánossy (1957), "Review of the experimental evidence for the law of variation of the electron mass with velocity", Il Nuovo Cimento, 5 (6): 379–383, Bibcode:1957NCim....5.1411F, doi:10.1007/BF02856033, S2CID 121179531
6. Glitscher, Karl (1917). "Spektroskopischer Vergleich zwischen den Theorien des starren und des deformierbaren Elektrons". Annalen der Physik. 357 (6): 608–630. Bibcode:1917AnP...357..608G. doi:10.1002/andp.19173570603. hdl:2027/uc1.b2637473.
7. Rogers, Marguerite M.; McReynolds, A. W.; Rogers, F. T. (1940), "A Determination of the Masses and Velocities of Three Radium B Beta-Particles: The Relativistic Mass of the Electron", Physical Review, 57 (5): 379–383, Bibcode:1940PhRv...57..379R, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.379, hdl:1911/18426
8. Meyer, V.; Reichart, W.; Staub, H.H. (1963). "Experimentelle Untersuchung der Massen-Impulsrelation des Elektrons". Helvetica Physica Acta. 36: 981–992. doi:10.5169/seals-113412.
9. Grove, D. J.; Fox, J. C. (1953). "e/m for 385-MeV protons (UA7)". Physical Review. 90 (2): 378. Bibcode:1953PhRv...90..333.. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.90.333.
10. Zrelov, V. P.; Tiapkin, A. A.; Farago, P. S. (1958). "Measurement of the mass of 600 MeV protons". Soviet Physics JETP. 7 (3): 384–387.
11. Bertozzi, William (1964), "Speed and Kinetic Energy of Relativistic Electrons", American Journal of Physics, 32 (7): 551–555, Bibcode:1964AmJPh..32..551B, doi:10.1119/1.1970770
12. Bertozzi, William (1962), The Ultimate Speed - An Exploration with High Energy Electrons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA
13. Marvel, Robert E.; Vineyard, Michael F. (2011). "Relativistic Electron Experiment for the Undergraduate Laboratory". arXiv:1108.5977 [physics.ed-ph].
14. Lund, M.; Uggerhøj, U. I. (2009), "Experimental special relativity with a meter stick and a clock", American Journal of Physics, 77 (8): 757–761, Bibcode:2009AmJPh..77..757L, doi:10.1119/1.3049532
15. Luetzelschwab, John W. (2003), "Apparatus to measure relativistic mass increase", American Journal of Physics, 71 (8): 878–884, Bibcode:2003AmJPh..71..878L, doi:10.1119/1.1561457
16. Couch, Jack G.; Dorries, Terry K. (1982), "Measuring relativistic electrons in the undergraduate laboratory", American Journal of Physics, 50 (10): 917–921, Bibcode:1982AmJPh..50..917C, doi:10.1119/1.12973
17. Geller, Kenneth N.; Kollarits, Richard (1972), "Experiment to Measure the Increase in Electron Mass with Velocity", American Journal of Physics, 40 (8): 1125–1130, Bibcode:1972AmJPh..40.1125G, doi:10.1119/1.1986771
18. Parker, Sherwood (1972), "Relativity in an Undergraduate Laboratory-Measuring the Relativistic Mass Increase", American Journal of Physics, 40 (2): 241–244, Bibcode:1972AmJPh..40..241P, doi:10.1119/1.1986498, S2CID 122167869
19. Bartlett, A. A.; Correll, Malcolm (1965), "An Undergraduate Laboratory Apparatus for Measuring e/m as a Function of Velocity. I", American Journal of Physics, 33 (4): 327–339, Bibcode:1965AmJPh..33..327B, doi:10.1119/1.1971493
20. Jolivette, P. L.; Rouze, N. (1994), "Compton scattering, the electron mass, and relativity: A laboratory experiment", American Journal of Physics, 62 (3): 266–271, Bibcode:1994AmJPh..62..266J, doi:10.1119/1.17611
21. Hoffman, Matthiam J. H. (1989), "The Compton effect as an experimental approach toward relativistic mass", American Journal of Physics, 57 (9): 822–825, Bibcode:1989AmJPh..57..822H, doi:10.1119/1.15902
22. Egelstaff, P. A.; Jackman, J. A.; Schultz, P. J.; Nickel, B. G.; MacKenzie, I. K. (1981), "Experiments in special relativity using Compton scattering of gamma rays", American Journal of Physics, 49 (1): 43–47, Bibcode:1981AmJPh..49...43E, doi:10.1119/1.12659
23. Higbie, J. (1974), "Undergraduate Relativity Experiment", American Journal of Physics, 42 (8): 642–644, Bibcode:1974AmJPh..42..642H, doi:10.1119/1.1987800
24. Dryzek, Jerzy; Singleton, Douglas; Suzuki, Takenori; Yu, Runsheng (2006), "An undergraduate experiment to test relativistic kinematics using in flight positron annihilation", American Journal of Physics, 74 (1): 49–53, Bibcode:2006AmJPh..74...49D, doi:10.1119/1.2142624
25. Zhang, Yuan Zhong (1997). Special Relativity and Its Experimental Foundations. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-2749-4.
26. Brown, B. C.; Masek, G. E.; Maung, T.; Miller, E. S.; Ruderman, H.; Vernon, W. (1973), "Experimental Comparison of the Velocities of eV (Visible) and GeV Electromagnetic Radiation", Physical Review Letters, 30 (16): 763–766, Bibcode:1973PhRvL..30..763B, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.763
27. Guiragossián, Z. G. T.; Rothbart, G. B.; Yearian, M. R.; Gearhart, R. A.; Murray, J. J. (1974), "Relative Velocity Measurements of Electrons and Gamma Rays at 15 GeV", Physical Review Letters, 34 (6): 335–338, Bibcode:1975PhRvL..34..335G, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.335, OSTI 1443188
28. Alväger, T.; Farley, F. J. M.; Kjellman, J.; Wallin, L. (1964), "Test of the second postulate of special relativity in the GeV region", Physics Letters, 12 (3): 260–262, Bibcode:1964PhL....12..260A, doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91095-9.
29. Fabjan, Christian W.; Gianotti, Fabiola (2003). "Calorimetry for particle physics" (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 75 (4): 1243–1286. Bibcode:2003RvMP...75.1243F. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1243.
30. Walz, Dieter R.; Noyes, H. Pierre; Carezani, Ricardo L. (1984). "Calorimetric test of special relativity". Physical Review A. 29 (4): 2110–2113. Bibcode:1984PhRvA..29.2110W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.29.2110. OSTI 1446354.
31. Fischer, G. E.; Murata, Y. (1970). "A beam monitor system for high-intensity photon beams in the multi-GeV range". Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 78 (1): 25–39. Bibcode:1970NucIM..78...25F. doi:10.1016/0029-554X(70)90425-8. OSTI 4752864.
32. Burton Richter (1976). "From the Psi to Charm – The Experiments of 1975 and 1976". Nobel lecture 1976.
33. LEP collaborations (1992), "Electroweak parameters of the Z0 resonance and the standard model", Physics Letters B, 276 (12): 247–253, Bibcode:1992PhLB..276..247., doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90572-L, hdl:2066/124399
34. Carlo Rubbia (1984). "Experimental Observation of the Intermediate Vector Bosons W+, W- and Z0". Nobel lecture 1984.
35. Einstein, A. (1905). "Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig?" [Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon its Energy-Content?]. Annalen der Physik (in German). 323 (13): 639–641. Bibcode:1905AnP...323..639E. doi:10.1002/andp.19053231314. ISSN 1521-3889.
36. Oliphant, M. L. E.; Kinsey, B. B.; Lord Rutherford (1933). "The Transformation of Lithium by Protons and by Ions of the Heavy Isotope of Hydrogen". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 141 (845): 722–733. Bibcode:1935RSPSA.149..406O. doi:10.1098/rspa.1935.0071.
37. Oliphant, M. L. E.; Kempton, A. R.; Lord Rutherford (1935). "The Accurate Determination of the Energy Released in Certain Nuclear Transformations". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 149 (867): 406–416. Bibcode:1935RSPSA.149..406O. doi:10.1098/rspa.1935.0071.
38. "Einstein Was Right (Again): Experiments Confirm that E= mc²". NIST. 2005.
39. Rainville, S.; Thompson, J.K.; Myers, E.G.; Brown, J.M.; Dewey, M.S.; Kessler, E.G. Jr.; Deslattes, R.D.; Börner, H.G; Jentschel, M.; Mutti, P.; Pritchard, D.E. (2005-12-22). "A direct test of E = mc²". Nature. 48 (7071): 1096–1097. doi:10.1038/4381096a. PMID 16371997. S2CID 4426118.

External links

• Physics FAQ: List of SR tests